Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/054,552

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Examiner
MARINELLI, PATRICK
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 776 resolved
+1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 1 has been amended and Claims 2-20 have been added as per the amendment filed on 4/8/2025. Currently Claims 1-20 are pending and prosecuted. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12265677 in view of Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104. Regarding Claim 1, US Patent 12265677, discloses an electronic device comprising (Claim 1: An electronic device comprising): a pen; a display panel comprising (Claim 1: a display panel comprising): a first area (Claim 1: a first area) ; a bending area at which the display panel is bent (Claim 1: a bending area at which the display panel is bent); a second area overlapped by the first area (Claim 1: a second area overlapped by the first area); first electrodes arranged in a first direction in the first area (Claim 1: first electrodes arranged in a first direction in the first area;); second electrodes arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction in the first area, and crossing the first electrodes (Claim 1: second electrodes arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction in the first area, and crossing the first electrodes;); and third electrodes in the first area, and overlapping with the first electrodes (Claim 1: and third electrodes in the first area, and overlapping with the first electrodes); and a circuit board coupled to the display panel at the second area, and comprising connection lines arranged in the first direction, and respectively electrically connected to the third electrodes (Claim 1: a circuit board coupled to the display panel at the second area, and comprising connection lines arranged in the first direction, and respectively electrically connected to the third electrodes;); a metal lower sheet between the display panel and the circuit board (Claim 1: a metal lower sheet between the display panel and the circuit board); a first magnetic-field-shielding layer between the third electrodes of the display panel and the metal lower sheet (Claim 1: a first magnetic-field-shielding layer between the third electrodes of the display panel and the metal lower sheet;); and a second magnetic-field-shielding layer between the connection lines of the circuit board and the metal lower sheet (Claim 1: and a second magnetic-field-shielding layer between the connection lines of the circuit board and the metal lower sheet). US Patent 12265677, doesn’t explicitly disclose a pen; and a display panel configured to detect input provided by the pen. Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104, disclose a pen ([0137]; a stylus pen); and a display panel configured to detect input provided by the pen (Abstract; [0107]; [0137-0138]; a display panel LDP provides an input device with an input surface for detecting input ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the disclosure of US Patent 12265677 to further include the teachings of Lee in order to provide a pen; and a display panel configured to detect input provided by the pen. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Lee teaches the use of an stylus pen as an input device on a display device that includes a display panel and a touch panel (Abstract; [0137];) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-7, 10-12, 14, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104, in further view of Kim, US Patent Publication 2021/0041972, in further view of Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, and in further view of Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936. Regarding Claim 2, Lee discloses an electronic device (Abstract; a display device) comprising: a display panel defining a first area and a second area (Figure 1 and 58; [0104]; [0402-0426]; a display panel LDP is considered by the examiner as “defining a first area and a second area”); first electrodes disposed in the first area and arranged in a first direction (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch electrodes TE1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “first direction”); second electrodes disposed in the first area, arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction, and crossing the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; second touch electrodes TE2 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “second direction” that crosses the first touch electrodes TE1); third electrodes disposed in the first area and overlapping with the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch coils TC1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and overlapping with the first touch electrode’s TE1, as seen in Figure 58). However, Lee doesn’t explicitly disclose a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction; and bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kim discloses a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area (Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; a display panel comprising a main area MA (first area), a bending area BA, and a pad area PDA (second area) that overlaps with the first area as seen in Figure 4) ; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines and arranged in the first direction (Figure 2-4 and 7; [0062-0079]; [0102-0104]; a circuit board 300, comprising of touch driving circuit 400 that is connected to the touch electrodes of a touch sensing layer TSL of the display panel, coupled to the pad area PDA, and comprises of lead line RL that are arranged in the “first direction). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee to further include the teachings of Kim such that a circuit board 300, coupled to a second area and comprising a touch driving circuit and lead lines, is connected to the touch electrodes and the touch coils, in order to provide a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; and a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Kim teaches a touch driving circuit in which a user's touch performed in (e.g., received at) a plurality of touch electrodes is sensed through one terminal or pin of the touch driving circuit, and a display device including the touch driving circuit. Accordingly, the number of receiving terminals or receiving pins of the touch driving circuit may be reduced, and an area of the touch driving circuit that is mounted on a circuit board may be reduce (Kim: [0007];). However, the combination of Lee and Kim doesn’t explicitly teach bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, discloses an electromagnetic induction type coordinate input device, which comprises of a plurality of loop coils disposed in the Y-axis direction (third electrodes). These loop coils are connected to a connector portion 20 through through holes 32aj-32dj and a straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) (Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee and Kim to further include the teachings of Kobari in order to provide bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is to utilize the teachings of Kobari in order to provide solving the problems of exclude a wasteful area occupied by the sensor (Kobari: [0024];). However, the combination of Lee, Kim, and Kobari doesn’t explicitly teach wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, discloses wherein the order of the plurality of fanout lines 2 electrically connected to the gull-wing lines 3 have inconsistent position orders but consistent order of the signals to be transmitted (Figure 13; [0303];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, and Kobari to further include the teachings of Xu such that the arrangement of lead lines RL is different from the arrangement of first touch coils in order to provide wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xu teaches having inconsistent position orders but consistent order of the signals to be transmitted (Xu: [0303];). Regarding Claim 3, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein a bending edge of the display panel is defined in the bending area, and the bridge lines are disposed in an area within a predetermined distance from the bending edge (Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]; the examiner considers “a bending edge” is defined in the bending area, and the straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) to be disposed in an area that is a “predetermined distance from the bending edge”) . Regarding Claim 4, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein each of the bridge lines extends in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction”). Regarding Claim 5, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes and the bridge lines and arranged in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction” and the first touch coils C1 to be “first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes”). Regarding Claim 6, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first loop trace lines, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto (Xu: Figure 13; [0303]; the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 7, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a second loop trace line electrically connected to all of the third electrodes (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; as seen in Figure 58, a ground line is connected to all of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 10, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further utilize the teachings of Xu such that the plurality of straight line portion used to connect a lead line to the first touch coil has a first straight line portion and a second straight line portion that is shorter than a first straight line portion, and is positioned closer to the “second area” than the second straight line portion in order to provide wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. The motivation to combine these arts is because Xu depicts where some connections are longer than others (Figure 13;), and because it has been help that rearranging part of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding Claim 11, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a sensor driver mounted on the circuit board and configured to selectively operate in a first mode for sensing touch input or a second mode for sensing pen input, wherein the second mode comprises a charging driving mode, and the sensor driver is configured to apply a first signal to at least one of the third electrodes and a second signal to another one of the third electrodes in the charging driving mode (Lee: Figure 28A; [0286-0290]; a touch panel driver 400T1 comprises of a first scan signal output part and a second scan signal output part that are turned on or off in response to a mode selection signal. The second scan signal output part provides second scan signals TS2(1)-TS2(p) to the corresponding first touch coils). Regarding Claim 12, Lee discloses an electronic device (Abstract; a display device) comprising: a display panel defining a first area, and a second area (Figure 1 and 58; [0104]; [0402-0426]; a display panel LDP is considered by the examiner as “defining a first area and a second area”); first electrodes disposed in the first area and arranged in a first direction (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch electrodes TE1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “first direction”); second electrodes disposed in the first area, arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction, and crossing the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; second touch electrodes TE2 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “second direction” that crosses the first touch electrodes TE1); and third electrodes disposed in the first area and overlapping with the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch coils TC1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and overlapping with the first touch electrode’s TE1, as seen in Figure 58). However, Lee does not disclose a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction and bridge lines respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kim discloses a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area (Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; a display panel comprising a main area MA (first area), a bending area BA, and a pad area PDA (second area) that overlaps with the first area as seen in Figure 4) ; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines and arranged in the first direction (Figure 2-4 and 7; [0062-0079]; [0102-0104]; a circuit board 300, comprising of touch driving circuit 400 that is connected to the touch electrodes of a touch sensing layer TSL of the display panel, coupled to the pad area PDA, and comprises of lead line RL that are arranged in the “first direction). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee to further include the teachings of Kim such that a circuit board 300, coupled to a second area and comprising a touch driving circuit and lead lines, is connected to the touch electrodes and the touch coils, in order to provide a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; and a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Kim teaches a touch driving circuit in which a user's touch performed in (e.g., received at) a plurality of touch electrodes is sensed through one terminal or pin of the touch driving circuit, and a display device including the touch driving circuit. However, the combination of Lee and Kim doesn’t explicitly teach the circuit board comprising bridge lines respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, discloses an electromagnetic induction type coordinate input device, which comprises of a plurality of loop coils disposed in the Y-axis direction (third electrodes). These loop coils are connected to a connector portion 20 through through holes 32aj-32dj and a straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) (Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee and Kim to further include the teachings of Kobari in order to provide the circuit board comprising bridge lines respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is to utilize the teachings of Kobari in order to provide solving the problems of exclude a wasteful area occupied by the sensor (Kobari: [0024];). However, the combination of Lee, Kim, and Kobari doesn’t explicitly teach wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, discloses wherein the order of the plurality of fanout lines 2 electrically connected to the gull-wing lines 3 have inconsistent position orders but consistent order of the signals to be transmitted (Figure 13; [0303];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, and Kobari to further include the teachings of Xu such that the arrangement of lead lines RL is different from the arrangement of first touch coils in order to provide wherein an arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xu teaches having inconsistent position orders but consistent order of the signals to be transmitted (Xu: [0303];). Regarding Claim 14, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further utilize the teachings of Xu such that the plurality of straight line portion used to connect a lead line to the first touch coil has a first straight line portion and a second straight line portion that is shorter than a first straight line portion, and is positioned closer to the “second area” than the second straight line portion in order to provide wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. The motivation to combine these arts is because Xu depicts where some connections are longer than others (Figure 13;), and because it has been help that rearranging part of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding Claim 19, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes and the bridge lines and arranged in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction” and the first touch coils C1 to be “first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes”), and a second loop trace line electrically connected to all of the third electrodes (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; as seen in Figure 58, a ground line is connected to all of the first touch coils C1), wherein the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first loop trace lines, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto (Xu: Figure 13; [0303]; the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 20, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a sensor driver mounted on the circuit board and configured to selectively operate in a first mode for sensing touch input or a second mode for sensing pen input, wherein the second mode comprises a charging driving mode, and the sensor driver is configured to apply a first signal to at least one of the third electrodes and a second signal to another one of the third electrodes in the charging driving mode (Lee: Figure 28A; [0286-0290]; a touch panel driver 400T1 comprises of a first scan signal output part and a second scan signal output part that are turned on or off in response to a mode selection signal. The second scan signal output part provides second scan signals TS2(1)-TS2(p) to the corresponding first touch coils). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104, in further view of Kim, US Patent Publication 2021/0041972, in further view of Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, and in further view of Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, and in further view of Xiong et al., US Patent Publication 2022/0201858. Regarding Claim 15, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the circuit board further comprises a shielding layer disposed between the connection lines and the first area of the display panel. Xiong et al., US Patent Publication 2022/0201858, teaches a first circuit board 11 that comprises of a first shielding layer 1008 and a second shielding layer 1009 are provided on the first side and the second side of a first substrate 1001, respectively. The first shielding layer 1008 is insulated from the first wiring layer 1002 by the first insulating layer 1003, and the second shielding layer 1009 is insulated from the second wiring layer 1004 by the second insulating layer 1005. Therefore, the shielding layer can prevent crosstalk between signal lines. For example, the first circuit board further comprises a first adhesive agent layer 1010, a reinforcing plate 1011, and a second adhesive agent layer 1012. For example, the first adhesive agent layer 1010 comprises a thermosetting adhesive. For example, the reinforcing plate 1011 is a steel plate. Therefore, the support for the first circuit board 11 is strengthened, which is beneficial for the installation of the first circuit board (Figure 3B; [0147];). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further include the teachings of Xiong in order to provide wherein the circuit board further comprises a shielding layer disposed between the connection lines and the first area of the display panel. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xiong teaches that the shielding layer can prevent crosstalk between signal lines (Xiong: [0147];). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 9, 13, and 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F MARINELLI whose telephone number is (571)270-3383. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at (571)-272-7495. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F MARINELLI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596403
SLIDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591270
COMPUTING DEVICE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591299
METHOD, SERVER AND DEVICE FOR OUTPUTTING XR CONTENT CORRESPONDING TO A TARGET WITHIN A CONSTRUCTION SITE BASED ON VOICE RECOGNITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586502
INTEGRATED DRIVING DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586500
COMPENSATION CIRCUIT FOR STRETCHABLE DISPLAY AND STRETCHABLE DISPLAY INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month