Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/054,552

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Nov 27, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0167244 +3 more
Examiner
MARINELLI, PATRICK
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
498 granted / 781 resolved
+1.8% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
791
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.3%
+47.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 781 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 2, 3, 8-14, and 20 have been amended as per the amendment filed on 4/28/2026. Currently Claims 1-20 are pending and prosecuted. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 4/28/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US Patent 12265677 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-7, 10-12, 14, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104, in further view of Kim, US Patent Publication 2021/0041972, in further view of Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, and in further view of Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936. Regarding Claim 2, Lee discloses an electronic device (Abstract; a display device) comprising: a display panel defining a first area and a second area (Figure 1 and 58; [0104]; [0402-0426]; a display panel LDP is considered by the examiner as “defining a first area and a second area”); first electrodes disposed in the first area and arranged in a first direction (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch electrodes TE1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “first direction”); second electrodes disposed in the first area, arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction, and crossing the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; second touch electrodes TE2 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “second direction” that crosses the first touch electrodes TE1); third electrodes disposed in the first area and overlapping with the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch coils TC1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and overlapping with the first touch electrode’s TE1, as seen in Figure 58). However, Lee doesn’t explicitly disclose a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction; and bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kim discloses a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area (Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; a display panel comprising a main area MA (first area), a bending area BA, and a pad area PDA (second area) that overlaps with the first area as seen in Figure 4) ; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines and arranged in the first direction (Figure 2-4 and 7; [0062-0079]; [0102-0104]; a circuit board 300, comprising of touch driving circuit 400 that is connected to the touch electrodes of a touch sensing layer TSL of the display panel, coupled to the pad area PDA, and comprises of lead line RL that are arranged in the “first direction). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee to further include the teachings of Kim such that a circuit board 300, coupled to a second area and comprising a touch driving circuit and lead lines, is connected to the touch electrodes and the touch coils, in order to provide a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; and a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Kim teaches a touch driving circuit in which a user's touch performed in (e.g., received at) a plurality of touch electrodes is sensed through one terminal or pin of the touch driving circuit, and a display device including the touch driving circuit. Accordingly, the number of receiving terminals or receiving pins of the touch driving circuit may be reduced, and an area of the touch driving circuit that is mounted on a circuit board may be reduce (Kim: [0007];). However, the combination of Lee and Kim doesn’t explicitly teach bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, discloses an electromagnetic induction type coordinate input device, which comprises of a plurality of loop coils disposed in the Y-axis direction (third electrodes). These loop coils are connected to a connector portion 20 through through holes 32aj-32dj and a straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) (Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee and Kim to further include the teachings of Kobari in order to provide bridge lines disposed in the first area that respectively electrically connect the connection lines to the third electrodes. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is to utilize the teachings of Kobari in order to provide solving the problems of exclude a wasteful area occupied by the sensor (Kobari: [0024];). However, the combination of Lee, Kim, and Kobari doesn’t explicitly teach wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, discloses wherein the order of ends, connected to the fanout lines 2, of the gull-wing lines 3 are opposite to the order of ends, connected to the output terminals 4, of the gull-wing lines 3. (Figure 7; [0214];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, and Kobari to further include the teachings of Xu such that the arrangement of lead lines RL is opposite from the arrangement of first touch coils in order to provide wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xu teaches having the order ends being opposite to each other, and where signal misalignment caused by inconsistent position order of the lines can be adjusted by the driver chip (Xu: [0214];). Regarding Claim 3, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein a bending edge of the display panel is defined in the bending area, and wherein the bridge lines are disposed in an area within a predetermined distance from the bending edge (Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]; the examiner considers “a bending edge” is defined in the bending area, and the straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) to be disposed in an area that is a “predetermined distance from the bending edge”) . Regarding Claim 4, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein each of the bridge lines extends in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction”). Regarding Claim 5, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes and the bridge lines and arranged in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction” and the first touch coils C1 to be “first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes”). Regarding Claim 6, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first loop trace lines, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto (Xu: Figure 13; [0303]; the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 7, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a second loop trace line electrically connected to all of the third electrodes (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; as seen in Figure 58, a ground line is connected to all of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 10, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and wherein the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further utilize the teachings of Xu such that the plurality of straight line portion used to connect a lead line to the first touch coil has a first straight line portion and a second straight line portion that is shorter than a first straight line portion, and is positioned closer to the “second area” than the second straight line portion in order to provide wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and wherein the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. The motivation to combine these arts is because Xu depicts where some connections are longer than others (Figure 13;), and because it has been help that rearranging part of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding Claim 11, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a sensor driver mounted on the circuit board and configured to selectively operate in a first mode for sensing touch input or a second mode for sensing pen input, wherein the second mode comprises a charging driving mode, and wherein the sensor driver is configured to apply a first signal to at least one of the third electrodes and a second signal to another one of the third electrodes in the charging driving mode (Lee: Figure 28A; [0286-0290]; a touch panel driver 400T1 comprises of a first scan signal output part and a second scan signal output part that are turned on or off in response to a mode selection signal. The second scan signal output part provides second scan signals TS2(1)-TS2(p) to the corresponding first touch coils). Regarding Claim 12, Lee discloses an electronic device (Abstract; a display device) comprising: a display panel defining a first area, and a second area (Figure 1 and 58; [0104]; [0402-0426]; a display panel LDP is considered by the examiner as “defining a first area and a second area”); first electrodes disposed in the first area and arranged in a first direction (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch electrodes TE1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “first direction”); second electrodes disposed in the first area, arranged in a second direction crossing the first direction, and crossing the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; second touch electrodes TE2 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and arranged in a “second direction” that crosses the first touch electrodes TE1); and third electrodes disposed in the first area and overlapping with the first electrodes (Figure 58; [0402-0426]; first touch coils TC1 are considered as being disposed in the “first area” and overlapping with the first touch electrode’s TE1, as seen in Figure 58). However, Lee does not disclose a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction and bridge lines respectively electrically connecting the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kim discloses a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area (Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; a display panel comprising a main area MA (first area), a bending area BA, and a pad area PDA (second area) that overlaps with the first area as seen in Figure 4) ; a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines and arranged in the first direction (Figure 2-4 and 7; [0062-0079]; [0102-0104]; a circuit board 300, comprising of touch driving circuit 400 that is connected to the touch electrodes of a touch sensing layer TSL of the display panel, coupled to the pad area PDA, and comprises of lead line RL that are arranged in the “first direction). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee to further include the teachings of Kim such that a circuit board 300, coupled to a second area and comprising a touch driving circuit and lead lines, is connected to the touch electrodes and the touch coils, in order to provide a display panel defining a first area, a bending area where the display panel is bent, and a second area overlapping with the first area; and a circuit board coupled to the second area of the display panel and comprising connection lines respectively connected to the third electrodes and arranged in the first direction. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Kim teaches a touch driving circuit in which a user's touch performed in (e.g., received at) a plurality of touch electrodes is sensed through one terminal or pin of the touch driving circuit, and a display device including the touch driving circuit. However, the combination of Lee and Kim doesn’t explicitly teach the circuit board comprising bridge lines respectively electrically connecting the connection lines to the third electrodes, wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, discloses an electromagnetic induction type coordinate input device, which comprises of a plurality of loop coils disposed in the Y-axis direction (third electrodes). These loop coils are connected to a connector portion 20 through through holes 32aj-32dj and a straight line portion YjLc or YjLc (bridge lines) (Kobori: Figure 1B; [0057-0069]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee and Kim to further include the teachings of Kobari in order to provide the circuit board comprising bridge lines respectively electrically connecting the connection lines to the third electrodes. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is to utilize the teachings of Kobari in order to provide solving the problems of exclude a wasteful area occupied by the sensor (Kobari: [0024];). However, the combination of Lee, Kim, and Kobari doesn’t explicitly teach wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, discloses wherein the order of ends, connected to the fanout lines 2, of the gull-wing lines 3 are opposite to the order of ends, connected to the output terminals 4, of the gull-wing lines 3. (Figure 7; [0214];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, and Kobari to further include the teachings of Xu such that the arrangement of lead lines RL is opposite from the arrangement of first touch coils in order to provide wherein an arrangement order of all of the connection lines is opposite to an arrangement order of the third electrodes, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xu teaches having the order ends being opposite to each other, and where signal misalignment caused by inconsistent position order of the lines can be adjusted by the driver chip (Xu: [0214];). Regarding Claim 14, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and wherein the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further utilize the teachings of Xu such that the plurality of straight line portion used to connect a lead line to the first touch coil has a first straight line portion and a second straight line portion that is shorter than a first straight line portion, and is positioned closer to the “second area” than the second straight line portion in order to provide wherein the bridge lines comprise a first bridge line and a second bridge line, which is shorter in length than the first bridge line, and the first bridge line is positioned closer to the second area than the second bridge line. The motivation to combine these arts is because Xu depicts where some connections are longer than others (Figure 13;), and because it has been help that rearranging part of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding Claim 19, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes and the bridge lines and arranged in the first direction (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; Kim: Figure 2-4; [0062-0079]; the examiner considers the “straight line portion” to be extending in the “first direction” and the first touch coils C1 to be “first loop trace lines electrically connected to the third electrodes”), and a second loop trace line electrically connected to all of the third electrodes (Lee: Figure 58; [0402-0426]; as seen in Figure 58, a ground line is connected to all of the first touch coils C1), wherein the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first loop trace lines, which are electrically connected to correspond thereto (Xu: Figure 13; [0303]; the arrangement order of the connection lines is different from an arrangement order of the first touch coils C1). Regarding Claim 20, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu teaches further comprising a sensor driver mounted on the circuit board and configured to selectively operate in a first mode for sensing touch input or a second mode for sensing pen input, wherein the second mode comprises a charging driving mode, and wherein the sensor driver is configured to apply a first signal to at least one of the third electrodes and a second signal to another one of the third electrodes in the charging driving mode (Lee: Figure 28A; [0286-0290]; a touch panel driver 400T1 comprises of a first scan signal output part and a second scan signal output part that are turned on or off in response to a mode selection signal. The second scan signal output part provides second scan signals TS2(1)-TS2(p) to the corresponding first touch coils). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al., US Patent Publication 2014/0078104, in further view of Kim, US Patent Publication 2021/0041972, in further view of Kobori et al., US Patent Publication 2013/0234730, and in further view of Xu et al., US Patent Publication 2024/0295936, and in further view of Xiong et al., US Patent Publication 2022/0201858. Regarding Claim 15, The combination of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the circuit board further comprises a shielding layer disposed between the connection lines and the first area of the display panel. Xiong et al., US Patent Publication 2022/0201858, teaches a first circuit board 11 that comprises of a first shielding layer 1008 and a second shielding layer 1009 are provided on the first side and the second side of a first substrate 1001, respectively. The first shielding layer 1008 is insulated from the first wiring layer 1002 by the first insulating layer 1003, and the second shielding layer 1009 is insulated from the second wiring layer 1004 by the second insulating layer 1005. Therefore, the shielding layer can prevent crosstalk between signal lines. For example, the first circuit board further comprises a first adhesive agent layer 1010, a reinforcing plate 1011, and a second adhesive agent layer 1012. For example, the first adhesive agent layer 1010 comprises a thermosetting adhesive. For example, the reinforcing plate 1011 is a steel plate. Therefore, the support for the first circuit board 11 is strengthened, which is beneficial for the installation of the first circuit board (Figure 3B; [0147];). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Lee, Kim, Kobari and Xu to further include the teachings of Xiong in order to provide wherein the circuit board further comprises a shielding layer disposed between the connection lines and the first area of the display panel. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Xiong teaches that the shielding layer can prevent crosstalk between signal lines (Xiong: [0147];). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 is allowed. Claims 8, 9, 13, and 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 2-20 have been fully considered, but they are directed to claims as amended, and therefore are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection presented above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F MARINELLI whose telephone number is (571)270-3383. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at (571)-272-7495. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F MARINELLI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 28, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641173
HOLDER FOR PORTABLE TERMINAL
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12625530
FULLY INTEGRATED QUANTUM COMPUTER
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611996
Gearshift Smartphone Mount Device
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614361
Implementing Shared Mixed Reality
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610002
Button Control Method for Electronic Device and Electronic Device
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.7%)
3y 4m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 781 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month