Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/054,661

MULTIUSER UNIFIED ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Nov 17, 2022 — continuation of 12/229,284
Examiner
JEUDY, JOSNEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Omnissa LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
674 granted / 804 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 804 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . On 06/02/2026 a Non-Final office action was mailed to the Applicant. However, the current Application has a submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 with preliminary amendments. Inadvertently a wrong set of claims was examined because of mislabeling of filing claims. Accordingly, this action has been made NON-FINAL. Therefore, the period for response has been restarted. 1. This action is responsive to the communication filed on May 01, 2025. At this time, claim 1 is cancelled. Claims 3-21 are pending and addressed below. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Double Patenting 2. The statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A statutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Omum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a statutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 2, 9 and 16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 8 and 15 of US Patent number 12229284. The conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the current application contains claims that are narrower in scope than the claims of the patent number 12229284 and are anticipated by the claims 1, 8 and 15. This is a non-provisional double patenting rejection. Claims Comparison Table Application Number 19/054,661 Patent Number 12229284 2. A method comprising: receiving, at a management server from a client device, a state sample that represents a snapshot of a state of the client device, wherein the state sample comprises a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies a user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; determining a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; determining a user channel identifier associated with a user account of the user identified by the user identifier; identifying a union of a device channel associated with the device channel identifier and a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and storing the state sample with the identified union of the device channel and the user channel and a time stamp that indicates a time when the state sample was obtained, in a storage device. 8. A method, comprising: receiving a device check-in from a client device, the device check-in comprising a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies the user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; obtaining a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; obtaining a user channel identifier associated with both the user identifier and the device identifier; selecting a first set of entitlements from a device channel associated with the device channel identifier; selecting a second set of entitlements from a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and providing the first set of entitlements and the second set of entitlements to the client device in response to the device check-in. 9. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a set of instructions executed by one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to perform a set of operations comprising: receiving, at a management server from a client device, a state sample that represents a snapshot of a state of the client device, wherein the state sample comprises a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies a user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; determining a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; determining a user channel identifier associated with a user account of the user identified by the user identifier; identifying a union of a device channel associated with the device channel identifier and a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and storing the state sample with the identified union of the device channel and the user channel and a time stamp that indicates a time when the state sample was obtained, in a storage device. 15. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium, comprising machine-readable instructions that, when executed by a processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to at least: receive a device check-in from a client device, the device check-in comprising a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies the user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; obtain a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; obtain a user channel identifier associated with both the user identifier and the device identifier; select a first set of entitlements from a device channel associated with the device channel identifier; select a second set of entitlements from a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and provide the first set of entitlements and the second set of entitlements to the client device in response to the device check-in. 16. A computer system comprising: one or more processors; and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, causes the one or more processors to: receive, at a management server from a client device, a state sample that represents a snapshot of a state of the client device, wherein the state sample comprises a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies a user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; determine a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; determine a user channel identifier associated with a user account of the user identified by the user identifier; identify a union of a device channel associated with the device channel identifier and a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and store the state sample with the identified union of the device channel and the user channel and a time stamp that indicates a time when the state sample was obtained, in a storage device. 1. A system, comprising: a computing device comprising a processor and a memory; and machine-readable instructions stored in the memory that, when executed by the processor, cause the computing device to at least: receive a device check-in from a client device, the device check-in comprising a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies the user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device; obtain a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; obtain a user channel identifier associated with both the user identifier and the device identifier; select a first set of entitlements from a device channel associated with the device channel identifier; select a second set of entitlements from a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and provide the first set of entitlements and the second set of entitlements to the client device in response to the device check-in. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to independent claims 2, 9 and 16, Chiussi; Fabio M., US 8693987 B2 discloses receiving, at a management server from a client device, a state sample that represents a snapshot of a state of the client device, wherein the state sample comprises a device identifier that uniquely identifies the client device with respect to other client devices and a user identifier that uniquely identifies a user of the client device with respect to other users of the client device. The prior art does not explicitly disclose determining a device channel identifier associated with the device identifier; determining a user channel identifier associated with a user account of the user identified by the user identifier; identifying a union of a device channel associated with the device channel identifier and a user channel associated with the user channel identifier; and storing the state sample with the identified union of the device channel and the user channel and a time stamp that indicates a time when the state sample was obtained, in a storage device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Manolarakis; Christos, US 10616782 B2, title “ Cross-channel User Tracking Systems, Methods And Devices.“ Chen; Jack, US 8131875 B1, title “ Device Profile Assignment Based On Device Capabilities . “ Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSNEL JEUDY whose telephone number is (571)270-7476. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00-8:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arani T Taghi can be reached at (571)272-3787. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Date: 8/28/2026 /JOSNEL JEUDY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2438
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737477
TRIGGERING A SECURITY ACTION BASED ON AN AI-GENERATED CODE PACKAGE RECOMMENDATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724878
GENERATING INSTRUMENTATION FOR DATA INTEGRITY OF FUNCTION CALLS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12711230
RANSOMWARE DISCOVERY BY DETECTION OF TRANSMIT/OVERWRITE PROCESSES
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12705615
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PAYMENT TERMINAL MANAGEMENT
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694101
VIRTUAL CANARY FILES TO MITIGATE RANSOMWARE ATTACKS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (-16.1%)
2y 9m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 804 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month