Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

Omnissa LLC

10 pending office actions • 9 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 73 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (30%)
6
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only6 (60%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
7
Information Tech
70% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SALAD, ABDULLAHI ELMI 1 84.7% +9.6%
ULRICH, NICHOLAS S 1 69.3% +7.6%
SALLEY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES 1 100.0% +0.0%
LE, CHAU D 1 85.4% +16.6%
CELANI, NICHOLAS P 1 46.0% +42.3%
BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 1 46.9% +31.5%
LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE 1 83.8% +31.1%
MORRIS, JOHN J 1 61.0% +19.9%
WALTON, CHESIREE A 1 30.2% +29.4%
HATCH, ANGELA MAIDA 1 0.0% +0.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18465689 HIDING SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL DESKTOP SESSIONS LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE 18d overdue
18607369 Enterprise Device Smart Clone SALLEY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES 27d
18821930 CONTROLLING DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES IN A NETWORK SALAD, ABDULLAHI ELMI

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18607366 Secure File Sharing Between Enrolled Users LE, CHAU D 44d overdue
17950122 IDENTIFYING ENTERPRISE CONNECTIONS HATCH, ANGELA MAIDA 17d overdue
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 29d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18607366 Secure File Sharing Between Enrolled Users LE, CHAU D 44d overdue
18465689 HIDING SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL DESKTOP SESSIONS LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE 18d overdue
18488501 AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CELANI, NICHOLAS P 14d
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 29d
18380219 USER-BASED EXTRACTION OF CONTENT BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R
18130277 EVENT BASED SOURCE REPLICATION ARCHITECTURE MORRIS, JOHN J

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2179 1
2193 1
2408 1
2449 1
2151 1
2195 1
2152 1
3624 1
3626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18821930 CONTROLLING DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES IN A NETWORK SALAD, ABDULLAHI ELMI DP Non-Final OA Pending Aug 30, 2024
18645151 VIRTUAL DESKTOP AFFINITY FOR SEAMLESS REMOTE DESKTOP WINDOWS ULRICH, NICHOLAS S 2179 §103 Final Rejection Pending Apr 24, 2024
18607369 Enterprise Device Smart Clone SALLEY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES 2193 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Mar 15, 2024
18607366 Secure File Sharing Between Enrolled Users LE, CHAU D 2408 §102§103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Mar 15, 2024
18488501 AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CELANI, NICHOLAS P 2449 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 17, 2023
18380219 USER-BASED EXTRACTION OF CONTENT BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 2151 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 16, 2023
18465689 HIDING SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL DESKTOP SESSIONS LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE 2195 §103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Sep 12, 2023
18130277 EVENT BASED SOURCE REPLICATION ARCHITECTURE MORRIS, JOHN J 2152 §103 Final Rejection Pending Apr 03, 2023
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Mar 29, 2023
17950122 IDENTIFYING ENTERPRISE CONNECTIONS HATCH, ANGELA MAIDA 3626 §101§103 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Sep 22, 2022

Managing Omnissa LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month