Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Omnissa LLC

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 9 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 67 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Omnissa LLC is currently navigating 13 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are spread across 13 distinct examiners, indicating that no two pending cases are currently being handled by the same person. The prosecution activity is further distributed across 9 distinct art units, showing that the company's software innovations touch upon several different technical classifications at the USPTO.

The busiest examiner, PATEL, SHIVANG I, is responsible for 1 pending case. This mirrors the overall distribution where 13 distinct examiners handle 13 pending office actions. For a practitioner, this lack of examiner overlap means that there is no central point of contact who can influence a large portion of the portfolio. Each of the 13 actions must be prosecuted as an independent matter with its own examiner-specific strategy.

The involvement of 9 distinct art units suggests that while the technology is centered on Computing & Software, it is diverse enough to be reviewed by multiple technical groups. This requires the practitioner to be familiar with the varying examination standards across these 9 units. With 13 distinct examiners to manage, the prosecution process is decentralized, requiring a broad range of arguments to satisfy the individual requirements of each examiner involved in the 13 pending actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (31%)
8
Medium (62%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (23%)
§103 only7 (54%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
62% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
23% of docket
2
Business / Other
15% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PATEL, SHIVANG I 1 75.0% +16.2%
JEUDY, JOSNEL 1 83.8% -16.1%
WHEATON, BRADFORD F 1 61.5% +11.2%
KABIR, MOHAMMAD H 1 67.4% +13.8%
CELANI, NICHOLAS P 1 45.8% +42.3%
BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 1 47.5% +30.1%
PAN, PHOEBE X 1 46.9% +42.2%
TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 1 88.2% +28.6%
MORRIS, JOHN J 1 61.4% +20.4%
WALTON, CHESIREE A 1 31.0% +29.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19054661 MULTIUSER UNIFIED ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT JEUDY, JOSNEL —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18144253 LOCALIZING A REMOTE DESKTOP TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 26d overdue
17895142 CONTEXTUAL TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS NOVAK, REBECCA R 23d
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 29d
18121602 ZERO-INPUT INTELLIGENCE MAINTENANCE ASSISTANT FOR A VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT MONTALVO, CARLOS FERNANDO 41d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18464697 UNIFYING AND CONNECTING MULTIPLE VIRTUAL DESKTOPS IN A CLIENT WINDOW PAN, PHOEBE X 30d overdue
18144253 LOCALIZING A REMOTE DESKTOP TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 26d overdue
18488501 AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CELANI, NICHOLAS P 14d
18607369 Enterprise Device Smart Clone WHEATON, BRADFORD F 27d
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 29d
19195281 ADJUSTING STREAMING OF SCREEN DATA BASED ON WINDOW VISIBILITY PATEL, SHIVANG I —
18381667 UNIFIED ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT KABIR, MOHAMMAD H —
18380219 USER-BASED EXTRACTION OF CONTENT BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2193 2
3629 2
2449 1
2151 1
2179 1
2198 1
2152 1
3624 1
2195 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19195281 ADJUSTING STREAMING OF SCREEN DATA BASED ON WINDOW VISIBILITY PATEL, SHIVANG I — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2025
19054661 MULTIUSER UNIFIED ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT JEUDY, JOSNEL — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2025
18607369 Enterprise Device Smart Clone WHEATON, BRADFORD F 2193 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Mar 15, 2024
18381667 UNIFIED ENDPOINT MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT KABIR, MOHAMMAD H 2193 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2023
18488501 AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CELANI, NICHOLAS P 2449 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 17, 2023
18380219 USER-BASED EXTRACTION OF CONTENT BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 2151 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 16, 2023
18464697 UNIFYING AND CONNECTING MULTIPLE VIRTUAL DESKTOPS IN A CLIENT WINDOW PAN, PHOEBE X 2179 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Sep 11, 2023
18144253 LOCALIZING A REMOTE DESKTOP TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 2198 §103§112 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending May 08, 2023
18130277 EVENT BASED SOURCE REPLICATION ARCHITECTURE MORRIS, JOHN J 2152 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2023
18127672 AUTOMATED ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ALERTING SYSTEM WALTON, CHESIREE A 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Mar 29, 2023
18121602 ZERO-INPUT INTELLIGENCE MAINTENANCE ASSISTANT FOR A VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT MONTALVO, CARLOS FERNANDO 3629 §101§103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Mar 15, 2023
18157802 SERVICE GATEWAY FOR SCALING OF VIRTUAL DESKTOP DEPLOYMENTS CASTANEDA, IVAN ALEXANDER 2195 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Jan 20, 2023
17895142 CONTEXTUAL TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS NOVAK, REBECCA R 3629 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Aug 25, 2022

Managing Omnissa LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month