Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/055,858

SEAL ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Examiner
TRAVERS, MATTHEW P
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
404 granted / 640 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 640 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hibbs et al. (U.S. PGPub 2002/0014009). Claim 1: Hobbs discloses a process of making a seal assembly (30 - Fig. 2 and paragraph 1), the process comprising: folding a strip (31) of metal material (paragraph 21) into an alternating sequence of internal folds and external folds (corrugated strip 42 - e.g. paragraph 21 and Figs. 4 and 6); and securing the strip of metal material to a support ring (welded to a ring - paragraph 29) having an annular shape defined around a seal axis (16 - see also Fig. 6), including securing the external folds to the support ring (by welding as cited above) in a manner for the strip to be arranged circumferentially relative the seal axis with the internal folds located radially inwardly relative the external folds (Fig. 6 and paragraph 21). Claim 4: Said securing includes welding the external folds to the support ring (paragraph 29). Claim 5: Said folding includes feeding the strip into a spacing defined between an external fold hammer and an internal fold hammer (44 and 46, or individual teeth thereof - see Fig. 4) in a manner for the feeding of the strip to alternatingly engage the internal fold hammer and the external fold hammer (any given tooth on each wheel would alternatingly engage the strip), the internal fold hammer forming the internal folds and the external fold hammer forming the external folds (Fig. 4. And paragraphs 23-24, noting either of the wheels could be considered an “inner” or “outer” hammer depending on their position relative to the formed strip) Claim 6: Said folding includes moving the external fold hammer and the internal fold hammer into and away from the spacing while feeding the strip (each tooth of each hammer would alternatingly move toward and away from the strip as it is formed). Claim 7: Said folding includes accumulating a folded portion of the strip in a magazine (50 - Fig. 4 and paragraph 25) having a curved shape corresponding to the annular shape of the support ring (paragraph 29 - the slot 49 in the guide block 50 may be curved to the correct radius for mounting). Claim 8: The process further comprises engaging a rotor (shaft 12a) within a circular opening concentric to the seal axis and delimited by the internal folds (paragraphs 20-21). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hibbs et al. in view of Inoue (U.S. Patent 9,598,970, cited in IDS). Claim 2: Hibbs discloses a process substantially as claimed except for forming the strip of metal material including assembling a plurality of wires adjacent one another into a strip arrangement, and applying a holding media to the strip arrangement to hold the plurality of wires in the strip arrangement. However, Inoue teaches that a folded strip of metal material for use in a turbine seal can be formed by assembling a plurality of wires (17) adjacent one another into a strip arrangement, and applying a holding media (adhesive) to the strip arrangement to hold the plurality of wires in the strip arrangement (column 6, line 65 - column 7, line 19). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed the strips of Hibbs using wires as taught by Inoue since it would have resulted in reduce wear, for example (column 7, lines 25-40). Claim 3: Inoue further implies removing the holding media during or subsequently to said securing, in that the fixation is made “tentatively” (as cited above). Claim 3 is alternatively rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hibbs et al. and Inoue as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Bridges et al. (U.S. Patent 4,678,113, cited in IDS). Inoue does not explicitly recite removing the holding media during or subsequently to said securing. However, Bridges teaches a similar method of forming a wire-based sealing strip wherein an adhesive is removed after securing the strip to a backing ring (column 5, lines 31-34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have removed the adhesive so as not to interfere with future use of the seal, for example. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hibbs et al. in view of McMillan (U.S. PGPub 2007/0126187). Hibbs further discloses using machining to break the strip of metal material at the internal folds, i.e. to fit the seal to the rotor (paragraphs 6, 28, 30-31). The cut line (61), in addition to the aforementioned paragraphs, suggests the inner folds would be removed to result in free ends or individual leaves. Hibbs does not achieve this by rotating the rotor relative the seal assembly, around the seal axis. However, McMillan teaches a process of forming a turbine seal comprising final sizing of the rotor-side of the seal via machining or in-service commissioning (paragraph 42). With “in-service commissioning” being understood to mean actual use of the rotor, i.e. rotating, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used said in-service commissioning to have achieved the result otherwise produced by Hibbs since it is taught by McMillan to be a known alternative to machining, and would have obviated the extra machining step, for example. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. PGPub 2003/0071423 discloses another method of forming a turbine seal by folding a strip (9) of metal material. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW P TRAVERS whose telephone number is (571)272-3218. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K. Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Matthew P Travers/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598725
CONFORMABLE COLD PLATE FOR FLUID COOLING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594652
ROTARY INSTALLATION TOOLS FOR CLINCH FASTENERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584465
MULTIPLE UP-TOWER LIFTING APPLIANCES ON WIND TURBINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12554228
GRIPPER DEVICE FOR MAINTAINING, CENTRING, AND/OR CLAMPING A MICROMECHANICAL OR HOROLOGICAL COMPONENT, AND ASSOCIATED FASTENING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544866
Shrink Fitting System
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month