Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/057,762

POWER ELECTRONICS CONVERTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Priority
Mar 12, 2024 — GB 2403524.8
Examiner
CHOI, SEUNG HO
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rolls-Royce plc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
22 granted / 22 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
47
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 22 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the application filed on 19 February 2025. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawing The drawing is objected to because of the following informalities: Fig. 3B uses the same number (310) at three phase electrical generator and first dc output terminal. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over David Trainer et. al (US20230373319A1; hereafter “David”) in view of Siyuan Liang et. al (Study on the Current Limiting Performance of a Novel SFCL in DC Systems; hereafter “Liang”). -Regarding claim 1: David discloses: PNG media_image1.png 594 882 media_image1.png Greyscale A power electronics converter (Fig. 3A; 320) comprising: an input terminal (Fig. 3A; 311a, b, c); first and second DC output terminals (Fig. 3A; two black squares on 330) ; a branch comprising first and second semiconductor switches connected in series between the first and second DC output terminals (Fig. 3A; 322 and 324 connected in series between two black squares), the input terminal connected to a node between the first and second semiconductor switches (Fig. 3A; 311a,b, c connected to nodes of red circles); a DC link capacitor connected between the first and second DC output terminals (Fig. 3A; 328); and Liang, in the same field of endeavor, discloses: a resistive damping element connected in series with the DC link capacitor (Fig. 3; SFCL), wherein a damping factor of a circuit comprising the DC link capacitor, the resistive damping element and an inductance of the circuit with a short (Fig. 1; novel DC SFCL includes resister, inductor, and switch) between the output terminals is at least 1 (table I and Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device described in David such that a commonly used superconducting current fault limiter (SFCL) described in Liang is applied to the power electronics converter. Doing so allows for improving DC power system fault protection. -Regarding claim 2: Liang discloses: The power electronics converter of claim 1, wherein the resistive damping element (Fig. 1; SFCL) comprises a damping resistor connected in parallel with a damping inductor (Fig. 2 b). -Regarding claim 3: Liang discloses: The power electronics converter of claim 2, wherein an impedance of the damping inductor is at least ten times the impedance of the damping resistor at a resonant frequency of the circuit (table I; superconducting coil L). -Regarding claim 4: David discloses: The power electronics converter of claim 3, wherein the resonant frequency Fo of the circuit is defined as F° where L is the inductance of the circuit with a short between the output terminals and C is a capacitance of the DC link capacitor (paragraph 0097). -Regarding claim 5: Liang discloses: The power electronics converter of claim 3, wherein a DC resistance of the damping inductor is less than 10% of a resistance of the damping resistor (table I; superconducting coil L). -Regarding claim 13: David discloses: The power electronics converter of claim1, further comprising a reverse-biased DC link diode connected across the DC link capacitor (Fig. 5B; 509). -Regarding claim 14: David discloses: The power electronics converter of claim 1, wherein the power electronics converter is an AC to DC converter (Fig. 3A; 300) and comprises a plurality of said branches -2- connected between the first and second DC output terminals (Fig. 3A;321a,b,c branches between two black squares on 330), the node between the first and second semiconductor switches of each branch being connectable to a respective phase of an electrical machine (Fig. 3A; red circles between 322 and 324 connected to each of 310). -Regarding claim 15: David discloses: An electrical power system comprising: an electrical machine (Fig. 3A; 310); a DC network (Fig. 3A; 330); and a power electronics converter (Fig. 3A; 320) according to claim1 wherein the electrical machine is connected to the node of the power electronics converter (Fig. 3A; 310 coupled to red circles) and the DC network is connected across the first and second output terminals (Fig. 3A; DC network coupled to two black squares). -Regarding claim 16: David discloses: The electrical power system of claim 15 further comprising a controller configured to provide switching signals to each switch of the power electronics converter (Fig. 3A; 340, paragraph 0068; “the controller 340 uses pulse width modulation to control the switching of the transistors to commutate current”). -Regarding claim 17: David discloses: The electrical power system of claim 16, wherein the controller is configured to detect a DC fault in the DC network and, upon detecting the DC fault, open each of the semiconductor switches until a detected DC level across the DC network falls below a predefined threshold (paragraph 0024; “The controller may be configured to detect a DC fault in the DC network and, upon detecting the DC fault, open each of the semiconductor switches until a detected DC level across the DC network falls below a predefined threshold.”). -Regarding claim 18: David discloses: An aircraft power and propulsion system (Fig. 1, 2) comprising: a gas turbine engine; and an electrical power system (Fig. 3A; 310) according to claim 15, wherein the electrical machine of the electrical power system is mechanically coupled with a spool of the gas turbine engine (claim 15). -Regarding claim 19: David discloses: An aircraft comprising the power and propulsion system of claim 18 (claim 16). -Regarding claim 20: David discloses: The aircraft of claim 19, wherein the aircraft is a hybrid electric aircraft (claim 17). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: -with respect to claim 6: the prior arts in David, and Liang disclose the claimed invention in basic claims but do not further disclose about “a first inductor connected between a first terminal of the DC link capacitor and the first DC output terminal; and a second inductor connected between a second terminal of the DC link capacitor and the second DC output terminal.”. -with respect to claim 12: the prior arts in David, and Liang disclose the claimed invention in basic claims but do not further disclose about “a forward biased diode connected in parallel across a damping resistor.”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEUNG HO CHOI whose telephone number is (571)272-8188. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:30 AM - 5:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Crystal Hammond can be reached at 571-270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEUNG HO CHOI/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /CRYSTAL L HAMMOND/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771233
DRIVING DEVICE AND POWER CONVERTER
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12754452
POWER SOURCE DEVICE, ELECTROPHORESIS DEVICE, POWER SOURCE DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, AND ELECTROPHORESIS DEVICE CONTROL METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749977
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A NON-INVERTING BUCK BOOST DC-DC CONVERTER AND CORRESPONDING CONVERTER
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744453
CURRENT LIMITING CIRCUIT
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726117
VOLTAGE BOOSTER AND VOLTAGE BOOSTER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 22 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month