Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/063,427

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Priority
Sep 16, 2022 — continuation of PCTJP2022034749
Examiner
RADKE, JAY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
KIOXIA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
732 granted / 852 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on February 26, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on July 21, 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1, 2, 6, 13, and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1, 2, 6, 13, and 19: To correct grammar, change “an other” to “another”. Regarding claim 1 and 19: To correct grammar, change “that receives” to “receiving” in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1 and 19: Each of the claims includes an embodiment, wherein the plurality of switches are connected in parallel and an end of each of the plurality of switches is connected to the same first node between the same two adjacent resistors of the second resistors without the connection being through one of the second resistors since “a first node” was used and not “a respective first node” but such an embodiment was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 2-18 depend on claim 1. Claim 20 depends on claim 19. To accurately claim the invention, Examiner suggests amending the claim as follows (using claim 1 as an example, wherein any impact on the dependent claims should also be considered): Claim 1: A semiconductor device comprising: an operational amplifier including a first input terminal, a second input terminal, and an output terminal, the operational amplifier that outputs a first voltage from the output terminal; a first resistor including one end connected to the first input terminal and another end connected to the output terminal; at least three second resistors including one end connected to the first input terminal, the plurality of second resistors connected in series; a plurality of switches each including one end connected to a respective first node between two adjacent resistors of the plurality of second resistors and another end connected to a second node, the plurality of switches receiving a digital code; and a current source circuit connected between the second node and a third node, wherein a switch out of the plurality of switches is turned on based on the digital code, and the current source circuit causes a first current to flow from a part or all of the plurality of second resistors to the third node via the switch in an on state. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-7 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3: Since N is undefined then the claim is indefinite. Claims 4-7 depend on claim 3. Regarding claim 5: The phrase “the number of resistors that are not present between the one end of the plurality of second resistors and the switch” is undefined negative limitation with no limits. The number may be zero ore ven infinity. Also, this term may be viewed as lacking sufficient antecedent basis. Regarding claim 13: The Greek letter alpha “α” is not defined. Also, “the variable ratio of a” is not defined. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY W RADKE whose telephone number is (571)270-1622. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAY W. RADKE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2827 /JAY W. RADKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744084
METHOD FOR READING A MULTI-LEVEL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR A PHASE-CHANGE MEMORY DEVICE, AND MULTI-LEVEL NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744095
MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738309
ADJUSTING REFRESH RATE DURING SELF-REFRESH STATE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725655
REDUNDANCY AND MAJORITY VOTING IN A KEY-VALUE DATA STORAGE SYSTEM USING CONTENT ADDRESSABLE MEMORY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718887
OPERATION METHODS OF MEMORY, MEMORY AND MEMORY SYSTEMS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month