Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/065,351

ROTATING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE INTERIOR ITEM, AND ROTATING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE SEAT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
May 31, 2019 — JP 2019-102647 +7 more
Examiner
ALEKSIC, NEVENA
Art Unit
3647
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ts Tech Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
96 granted / 127 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
152
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 127 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 8 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on August 21, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Line et al. (US 2020/0331366 A1), hereinafter Line. Regarding claim 1, Line discloses a vehicle seat device that includes a rotation mechanism that has a rotating member (second bracket 154, fig. 10) having mounted thereon a seat cushion frame supporting a seat cushion (see seat 60 in fig. 11) and a base member (rotation assembly 170, fig. 7) rotatably supporting the rotating member from below (as disclosed in at least para. [0054], and fig. 7), wherein at least part, along a peripheral direction, of an outer periphery of an upper part of the rotating member is covered by a cover from the outside (as shown in annotated figs. 1 & 2), wherein the seat cushion frame has a pair of side frames that are disposed so as to extend linearly in the fore-and-aft direction at positions spaced from each other in the left-and-right direction (see base member 42 disposed on each side in fig. 4), and a rear pipe that provides a link between rear end parts of the pair of side frames (as shown in annotated fig. 2 and figs. 4-7), and wherein the rear end of the cover is located behind the front end of the rear pipe, and forward of the rear end of the seat cushion (as shown in annotated fig. 1 below). [AltContent: textbox ([img-media_image1.png])][AltContent: textbox ([img-media_image2.png])] [AltContent: textbox (Annotated fig. 1: annotated image of Line’s fig. 4)][AltContent: textbox (Annotated fig. 2: annotated image of Line’s fig. 4)] Regarding claim 2, Line discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein the cover includes an upper plate having a flat-plate shape and a plate portion extending downward from an end of the upper plate oppose to the rotating member (as shown in annotated fig. 3 below). PNG media_image3.png 332 556 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 3: annotated image of Line’s fig. 9 Regarding claim 3, Line discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein the cover includes an upper plate having a flat-plate shape and a pair of end walls extending downwards from both lateral ends of the upper plate (as shown in annotated fig. 4 below). PNG media_image4.png 332 556 media_image4.png Greyscale Annotated fig. 4: annotated image of Line’s fig. 9 Regarding claim 6, Line discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein an outside face of the cover is formed into an arc shape that protrudes toward the outside of the rotating member (as shown in annotated figs. 3 & 4 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Line as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Slivik (US 3,093,415 A). Regarding claim 7, Line discloses the invention in claim 1, but does not appear to specifically disclose wherein a lower end position of a side cover covering the side frame from the outside is set at the same height as a lower end position of the cover. However, Slivik is in the field of a vehicle seat (Abstract) and teaches a side cover covering the side frame from the outside (Col. 2, lines 18-22, “[t]he seat portion 14 is mounted within a receiving well defined by a contoured member 16 that envelops the lower portion of the seat and serves as an attractive cover for the frame portion of the seat”; as shown in figs. 1 & 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Line such that there was a side cover as taught by Slivik, in order to serve as an attractive cover for the frame portion of the seat (Slivik: Col. 2, lines 18-22). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure: See PTO 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NEVENA ALEKSIC whose telephone number is (571)272-1659. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30am-5:30pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kimberly Berona can be reached at (571)272-6909. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.A./Examiner, Art Unit 3647 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767029
SNAP-THROUGH COLLASPIBLE SEAT SIDE BOLSTERS AND FOLDABLE VEHICLE SEAT ASSEMBLIES WITH COLLAPSIBLE SIDE BOLSTERS
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12747024
Mechanical De-Icing System
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741758
VEHICLE WITH A PROPULSION SYSTEM ENCLOSED IN A SEALED CONTAINER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741568
LONGITUDINAL ADJUSTER FOR A VEHICLE SEAT, AND VEHICLE SEAT
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734424
STEERABLE ROPING TRAINING APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 127 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month