Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Ts Tech Co., Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

26 pending office actions • 9 art units • 20 examiners • 0 of 26 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 36 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ts Tech Co., Ltd. maintains 24 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 20 distinct examiners and 9 distinct art units. NELSON JR, MILTON is the busiest examiner in the portfolio, currently overseeing 2 pending cases. This distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property strategy involves a wide range of mechanical and systems-based innovations.

The count of 20 distinct examiners relative to 24 pending office actions implies that practitioners must manage a variety of examiner-specific preferences and negotiation styles. With only 2 pending cases assigned to the busiest examiner, there is very little concentration of workload under any single individual. This lack of concentration means that insights gained from one examiner are unlikely to apply to the majority of the other pending matters. Practitioners must therefore prepare for a decentralized prosecution process.

The presence of 9 distinct art units further indicates that the portfolio covers a significant breadth of technical subject matter within the USPTO classification system. Navigating 9 different art units requires familiarity with various internal policies and examination trends. Because the busiest examiner, NELSON JR, MILTON, only handles 2 of the 24 actions, the overall success of the portfolio depends on achieving favorable outcomes across a group of mostly independent examiners within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

26
Total Pending OAs
22
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

14
Hard (54%)
8
Medium (31%)
3
Easy (12%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (23%)
§102 only1 (4%)
§112 only3 (12%)
Double-patenting + other1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)14 (54%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
4% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
13
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
12
Business / Other
46% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

260 h
Manual time on pending OAs
52 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
91 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT 3 82.5% +17.8%
NELSON JR, MILTON 2 84.6% +5.7%
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 2 80.1% +13.9%
KIM, SHIN H 2 64.4% +11.5%
CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 2 82.0% +6.9%
CHEN, JOSE V 1 78.0% +15.1%
BRADFORD, JONATHAN 1 76.1% +21.3%
BEMKO, TARAS P 1 84.4% +19.3%
GABLER, PHILIP F 1 72.9% +23.4%
BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J 1 81.8% +7.4%

Quick Wins (6)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19196467 SENSOR DISPOSITION STRUCTURE IN SEAT NELSON JR, MILTON —
19098745 SEAT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
19111923 CONVEYANCE SKIN MATERIAL AND CONVEYANCE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18952478 VEHICLE SEAT BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J —
18950332 SEAT FRAME FOR VEHICLE SEAT NELSON JR, MILTON —
18847120 SEAT MOUNTING STRUCTURE CONDO, VERONICA MARIE —

Hard Cases (14)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18304484 VEHICLE DOOR, VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 163d overdue
18697660 CONVEYANCE SEAT FILOSI, TERRI L 141d overdue
18730166 VEHICLE SEAT SYSTEM CHEN, JOSE V —
19109960 SEAT FOR SADDLE-RIDE TYPE VEHICLE BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
19101798 VEHICLE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18879944 CONVEYANCE ASSEMBLY BRADFORD, JONATHAN —
18697345 VEHICLE BEMKO, TARAS P —
18715283 CONVEYANCE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19098745 SEAT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
19111923 CONVEYANCE SKIN MATERIAL AND CONVEYANCE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18730166 VEHICLE SEAT SYSTEM CHEN, JOSE V —
19109960 SEAT FOR SADDLE-RIDE TYPE VEHICLE BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
19106848 HEADREST KIM, SHIN H —
19101798 VEHICLE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18879944 CONVEYANCE ASSEMBLY BRADFORD, JONATHAN —
18697345 VEHICLE BEMKO, TARAS P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3636 4
3612 3
3631 1
3647 1
2685 1
3667 1
3632 1
3644 1
3785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19196467 SENSOR DISPOSITION STRUCTURE IN SEAT NELSON JR, MILTON — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2025
19098745 SEAT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19111923 CONVEYANCE SKIN MATERIAL AND CONVEYANCE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2025
18730166 VEHICLE SEAT SYSTEM CHEN, JOSE V — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2025
19109960 SEAT FOR SADDLE-RIDE TYPE VEHICLE BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 3636 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19106848 HEADREST KIM, SHIN H — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2025
19101798 VEHICLE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT 3636 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2025
18879944 CONVEYANCE ASSEMBLY BRADFORD, JONATHAN — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18697345 VEHICLE BEMKO, TARAS P — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18715283 CONVEYANCE SEAT WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT — §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18953981 Vehicle Seat GABLER, PHILIP F — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18952478 VEHICLE SEAT BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18951372 SEAT RAIL ASSEMBLY MORRIS, TAYLOR L 3631 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18950332 SEAT FRAME FOR VEHICLE SEAT NELSON JR, MILTON — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18949436 Electrically Powered Slide Rail and Vehicle Seat Provided with Electrically Powered Slide Rail LYJAK, LORI LYNN 3612 — Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18866167 CONVEYANCE SEAT LIBBY, TROY ALAN 3636 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18865279 CONVEYANCE SEAT ALEKSIC, NEVENA 3647 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18926464 SEAT SYSTEM WITH SENSOR AND USER INTERFACE BURGDORF, STEPHEN R 2685 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Oct 25, 2024
18695707 VEHICLE SEAT KIM, SHIN H 3636 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 14, 2024
18849806 VEHICLE DANIELS, JASON S — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18847120 SEAT MOUNTING STRUCTURE CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 3612 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18808824 VEHICLE SEAT KHALED, ABDALLA A 3667 §103§112DP Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Aug 19, 2024
18723760 Vehicle Seat SMITH, NKEISHA 3632 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2024
18697660 CONVEYANCE SEAT FILOSI, TERRI L 3644 §102§103 Non-Final OA 141d overdue Pending Apr 01, 2024
18444213 VEHICLE SEAT VO, TU A 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024
18304484 VEHICLE DOOR, VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 3612 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 163d overdue Pending Apr 21, 2023

Managing Ts Tech Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month