Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/071,240

DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING AN INPUT SENSOR AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Jun 04, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0073059
Examiner
MANDEVILLE, JASON M
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 742 resolved
-6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
788
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 742 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species I, corresponding to originally filed Claims 1-3, in the reply filed on 19 May 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Claims 4-5, 7, and 11-16, corresponding to Species II, III, V, VIII, IX, and X, “all relate to the embodiment illustrated in Figure 8 of the present application,” “are not patentably distinct,” and, therefore, should be examined together without “any serious or undue search burden on the Examiner.” This is found persuasive. Therefore, Claims 4-5, 7, and 11-16 are rejoined with Species I and Claims 1-3. The restriction requirement with respect to Claims 6, 8-10, and 17-20 has not been traversed. Thus, the requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL with respect to Species IV, VI, VII, XI, XII, and XIII, corresponding to originally filed Claims 6, 8-10, and 17-20. Claims 6, 8-10, and 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 19 May 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 7, and 11-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (hereinafter “Kim” US 2023 / 0217693) in view of An et al. (hereinafter “An” US 2018 / 0143717). As pertaining to Claim 1, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) a display device (DD; see Page 3 through Page 4, Para. [0059] and [0068]), comprising: a display panel (DM; see Page 5, Para. [0075] and [0081]-[0084]; and Page 6, Para. [0089]-[0090] and [0092]) comprising an organic layer (BS; see Page 6, Para. [0095]), a light emitting element (see (OL1, OL2, OL3); see Page 6, Para. [0098]-[0099]) disposed on the organic layer (BS), and a thin-film encapsulation layer (EN2; see Page 7, Para. [0108]) sealing the light emitting element (OL1, OL2, OL3); and an input sensor (i.e., an input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM); see Page 4 through Page 5, Para. [0072]-[0073]) comprising a sensing electrode (i.e., a capacitive, resistive, infrared, or pressure electrode implicit in the input sensor) disposed on the display panel (DM), wherein the light emitting element (OL1, OL2, OL3) comprises: a first light emitting element (OL1) configured to provide a first light emitting area (i.e., a central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) having a first surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1)); and a second light emitting element (OL2) configured to provide a second light emitting area (i.e., a central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) having a second surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1)) that is greater than the first surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1); note that as shown in Fig. 7A, the surface area of (OL1) is smaller than the surface area of (OL2), and the surface area of (OL2) is smaller than the surface area of (OL3); also see Fig. 4), and wherein a first distance (TH1) between the first light emitting element (OL1) and the input sensor (i.e., the input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM)) is less than a second distance (TH2) between the second light emitting element (OL2) and the input sensor (i.e., the input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM)) in a thickness direction (i.e., a vertical direction of Fig. 7A) of the display device (DD; see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). Kim does not explicitly disclose the structural features of the input sensor. That is, Kim does not explicitly disclose that the input sensor comprises a sensing electrode comprising a line element defining an opening area corresponding to the light emitting element. However, this structure is well-known in the art. In fact, in the same field of endeavor, An discloses (see Fig. 4, Fig. 7, Fig. 10, and Fig. 19) that it was well-known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a display device comprising an input sensor (TS), wherein the input sensor (TS) comprises a sensing electrode (see Fig. 7 and (Tx, Rx) in Fig. 10) disposed on a display panel (see (E2, EL, E1) in Fig. 4; see Page 4, Para. [0112]-[0116]), wherein the sensing electrode (TS) comprises a line element (see Fig. 7) defining an opening area corresponding to a light emitting element (EL) of the display panel (see Page 5, Para. [0132]-[0135] and [0137]; also see Page 6, Para. [0164]; Page 7, Para. [0183]-[0184] and [0196]-[0200]; and Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0210]-[0212]). It is a goal of An to provide a display device structure comprising an input sensor in which a sensing electrode is disposed on a display panel in a manner that allows for improved touch sensitivity, simple fabrication, and reduced thickness (see Page 1, Para. [0017]-[0020]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Kim with the teachings of An, such that the input sensor comprises a sensing electrode comprising a line element defining an opening area corresponding to the light emitting element, in the manner suggested by An, in order to provide a display device and input sensor structure that allows for improved touch sensitivity, simple fabrication, and reduced thickness. As pertaining to Claim 2, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the organic layer (BS) comprises: a first area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the first light emitting element (OL1); and a second area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the second light emitting element (OL2), wherein a thickness (i.e., a width) of the first area is greater than a thickness (i.e., a width) of the second area (see Fig. 7A; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). As pertaining to Claim 3, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the first area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) and the second area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) of the organic layer (BS) together have a single integrated body (see Fig. 7A), and wherein a step (i.e., a difference in width) is defined between the first area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) and the second area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) of the organic layer (BS; again, see Fig. 7A; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). As pertaining to Claim 4, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that an electrode (AE1) of the first light emitting element (OL1) is in contact (i.e., via layer (DP-CL)) with the first area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) of the organic layer (BS), and an electrode (AE2) of the second light emitting element (OL2) is in contact (i.e., via layer (DP-CL)) with the second area (i.e., the area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) of the organic layer (BS; see Fig. 7A and Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0100]-[0101]). As pertaining to Claim 5, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the thin-film encapsulation layer (EN2) comprises: a first area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the first light emitting element (OL1); and a second area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the second light emitting element (OL2), wherein a thickness (i.e., a width or a height) of the first area of the thin-film encapsulation layer (EN2) is less than a thickness (i.e., a width or a height) of the second area of the thin-film encapsulation layer (EN2; see Fig. 7A; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). As pertaining to Claim 7, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) a pixel defining layer (DP-OL) disposed on the organic layer (BS), wherein each of the first light emitting element (OL1) and the second light emitting element (OL2) comprises a first electrode (AE1, AE2), a second electrode (CE), and a light emitting layer (EM1, EM2) disposed between the first electrode (AE1, AE2) and the second electrode (CE), wherein a first opening (i.e., spacing) exposing the first electrode (AE1) of the first light emitting element (OL1) and a second opening (i.e., spacing) exposing the first electrode (AE2) of the second light emitting element (OL2) are defined in the pixel defining layer (DP-OL), wherein the first electrode (AE1) of the first light emitting element (OL1), which is exposed by the first opening (i.e., the first spacing), is defined as the first light emitting area (i.e., the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)), and the first electrode (AE2) of the second light emitting element (OL2), which is exposed by the second opening (i.e., the second spacing), is defined as the second light emitting area (i.e., the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1); again, see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). As pertaining to Claim 11, An discloses (see Fig. 19) that the input sensor (TS) further comprises a first insulation layer (400), a second insulation layer (1120) disposed on the first insulation layer (400), and a third insulation layer (1900) disposed on the second insulation layer (1120), and wherein the sensing electrode (see (Tx, Rx)) comprises first sensing portions (i.e., first arbitrary electrode portions), a bridge pattern (Br) connecting adjacent portions (i.e., arbitrary portions) of the first sensing portions (i.e., the first arbitrary electrode portions), second sensing portions (i.e., second arbitrary electrode portions), and an intermediate portion (i.e., an arbitrary portion) disposed between adjacent portions (i.e., arbitrary portions) of the second sensing portions (i.e., the second arbitrary electrode portions), wherein the bridge pattern (Br) is disposed between the first insulation layer (400) and the second insulation layer (1120), wherein the first sensing portions (i.e., the first arbitrary electrode portions), the intermediate portion (i.e., the arbitrary portion), and the second sensing portions (i.e., the second arbitrary electrode portions) are disposed between the second insulation layer (1120) and the third insulation layer (1900; again, see Page 7, Para. [0183]-[0184] and [0196]-[0200]; and Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0210]-[0212]). As pertaining to Claim 12, An discloses (see Fig. 19) that the first insulation layer (400) comprises an inorganic material (see Page 4, Para. [0115]); and the second insulation layer (1120) provides a flat surface (see Fig. 19). An does not explicitly disclose the material composition of the second insulation layer (1120). That is, An does not disclose that the second insulation layer comprises an organic material. However, Kim discloses that the implementation of a second insulation layer comprising an organic material can be effective in both improving light emission efficiency of a display module and simultaneously protecting elements from foreign matter such as dust (see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0110]-[0113]). Therefore, again, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that the combined teachings of Kim and An suggest the implementation of a second insulation layer that comprises an organic material in order to effectively improve light emission efficiency of the display device while simultaneously protecting elements from foreign matter. As pertaining to Claim 13, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the light emitting element (OL1, OL2, OL3) further comprises a third light emitting element (OL3) configured to provide a third light emitting area (i.e., a central area of (OL3) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) having a third surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1)) that is greater than the second surface area (i.e., the surface area of (OL2) as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1); again, note that as shown in Fig. 7A, the surface area of (OL1) is smaller than the surface area of (OL2), and the surface area of (OL2) is smaller than the surface area of (OL3); also see Fig. 4), and wherein a third distance (TH3) between the third light emitting element (OL3) and the input sensor (i.e., the input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM)) is greater than the second distance (TH2) between the second light emitting element (OL2) and the input sensor (i.e., the input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM); again, see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). As pertaining to Claim 14, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the third light emitting element (OL3) is spaced apart from the first light emitting element (OL1) and the second light emitting element (OL2) in a first direction (i.e., a vertical or horizontal direction; see Fig. 4), and wherein the first light emitting element (OL1) and the second light emitting element (OL2) are spaced apart from each other in a second direction (i.e., a horizontal or vertical direction; again, see Fig. 4) crossing the first direction (i.e., the vertical or horizontal direction; see Page 5, Para. [0081]-[0084]; and Page 6, Para. [0089]-[0090] and [0092]). As pertaining to Claim 15, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) an electronic device (DD; see Page 3 through Page 4, Para. [0059] and [0068]), comprising: a display panel (DM; see Page 5, Para. [0075] and [0081]-[0084]; and Page 6, Para. [0089]-[0090] and [0092]) comprising an organic layer (BS; see Page 6, Para. [0095]), a light emitting element (see (OL1, OL2, OL3); see Page 6, Para. [0098]-[0099]) disposed on the organic layer (BS), and a thin-film encapsulation layer (TFE; see Page 7, Para. [0108]) sealing the light emitting element (OL1, OL2, OL3); and an input sensor disposed on the display panel (DM; i.e., an input sensing module, not shown, disposed on the display panel (DM); see Page 4 through Page 5, Para. [0072]-[0073]), the input sensor (i.e., input sensing module) comprising a sensing electrode (i.e., a capacitive, resistive, infrared, or pressure electrode implicit in the input sensor) disposed on the display panel (DM); and a processor (i.e., an electronic and/or function module) configured to control the display panel (DM) and the input sensor (i.e., the input module; see Page 5, Para. [0074]), wherein the light emitting element (OL1, OL2, OL3) comprises a first light emitting element (OL1) configured to provide a first light emitting area (i.e., a central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) having a first surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1)), and a second light emitting element (OL2) configured to provide a second light emitting area (i.e., a central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) having a second surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1)) that is greater than the first surface area (i.e., as defined by the corresponding flat portion of (EN1); note that as shown in Fig. 7A, the surface area of (OL1) is smaller than the surface area of (OL2), and the surface area of (OL2) is smaller than the surface area of (OL3); also see Fig. 4; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]), wherein the organic layer (BS) comprises a first area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the first light emitting element (OL1), and a second area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the second light emitting element (OL2), and wherein a thickness (i.e., a width) of the first area is greater than a thickness (i.e., a width) of the second area (see Fig. 7A; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). Kim does not explicitly disclose the structural features of the input sensor. That is, Kim does not explicitly disclose that the input sensor comprises a sensing electrode comprising a line element defining an opening area corresponding to the light emitting element. However, this structure is well-known in the art. In fact, in the same field of endeavor, An discloses (see Fig. 4, Fig. 7, Fig. 10, and Fig. 19) that it was well-known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a display device comprising an input sensor (TS), wherein the input sensor (TS) comprises a sensing electrode (see Fig. 7 and (Tx, Rx) in Fig. 10) disposed on a display panel (see (E2, EL, E1) in Fig. 4; see Page 4, Para. [0112]-[0116]), wherein the sensing electrode (TS) comprises a line element (see Fig. 7) defining an opening area corresponding to a light emitting element (EL) of the display panel (see Page 5, Para. [0132]-[0135] and [0137]; also see Page 6, Para. [0164]; Page 7, Para. [0183]-[0184] and [0196]-[0200]; and Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0210]-[0212]). It is a goal of An to provide a display device structure comprising an input sensor in which a sensing electrode is disposed on a display panel in a manner that allows for improved touch sensitivity, simple fabrication, and reduced thickness (see Page 1, Para. [0017]-[0020]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Kim with the teachings of An, such that the input sensor comprises a sensing electrode comprising a line element defining an opening area corresponding to the light emitting element, in the manner suggested by An, in order to provide a display device and input sensor structure that allows for improved touch sensitivity, simple fabrication, and reduced thickness. As pertaining to Claim 16, Kim discloses (see Fig. 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 7A) that the thin-film encapsulation layer (TFE) comprises inorganic encapsulation layers (EN1, EN3) and an organic encapsulation layer (EN2) disposed between the inorganic encapsulation layers (i.e., (EN1, EN3); see Page 7, Para. [0109]-[0110]), wherein the organic encapsulation layer (EN2) comprises: a first area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL1) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the first light emitting element (OL1); and a second area (i.e., an area corresponding to the central area of (OL2) corresponding to the flat portion of (EN1)) overlapping the second light emitting element (OL2), and wherein a thickness (i.e., a width or a height) of the first area of the organic encapsulation layer (EN2) is less than a thickness (i.e., a width or a height) of the second area of the organic encapsulation layer (EN2; see Fig. 7A; and see Page 13 through Page 14, Para. [0187]-[0191]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M MANDEVILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3136. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:30AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M MANDEVILLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704906
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF MAPPING A GESTURE TO RESPECTIVE ACTIONS OF RESPECTIVE APPLICATIONS
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690766
OPHTHALMOLOGIC APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693537
DISPLAY APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING EXPANDED VIEWING WINDOW
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682822
GOA CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY PANEL
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675132
COMPUTING DEVICE SLIDER PLATE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.3%)
3y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 742 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month