Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/076,077

TOUCH PANEL

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Examiner
SHERMAN, STEPHEN G
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1334 granted / 1626 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1626 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 15/077,009, filed on 22 March 2016. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 14 March 2025 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites “wherein the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer are provided under the second insulating layer.” However, claim 13, from which claim 14 depends, recites “a second conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer…a third conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer…a fourth conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer; a third insulating layer over and in direct contact with the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer…” Thus, due to the direct contact nature of claim 13, it is unclear how the second, third and fourth conductive layers can be under both of the second and third insulating layers while also somehow in direct contact with both the second and third insulating layers. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) in view of Chen et al. (US 2011/0025969). Regarding claim 1, Kim et al. disclose a display device (Figure 5) comprising: a semiconductor layer over a substrate, the semiconductor layer comprising a channel formation region (Figure 5, semiconductor layer 113 is over substrate 101. See paragraph [0053].); a first conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate electrode (Figure 5, 120 is a first conductive layer that serves as a gate electrode. See paragraph [0054].); a first insulating layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate insulating layer (Figure 5, 116 is a first insulating layer that serves as a gate insulating layer. See paragraph [0054].); a second insulating layer over the first insulating layer and the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, 140 is a second insulating layer over 116 and 113. See paragraph [0058].); a second conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer, the second conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a source electrode (Figure 5, 133 is a second conductive layer in contact with 140, where 133 serves as a source electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a third conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer, the third conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a drain electrode (Figure 5, 136 is a third conductive layer in contact with 140, where 136 serves as a drain electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a fourth conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer (Figure 5, 130 is a fourth conductive layer in contact with 140. See paragraph [0056].); a third insulating layer over the second conductive layer and the third conductive layer (Figure 5, 145 is a third insulating layer over 133 and 136. See paragraph [0058].); a fifth conductive layer over the third insulating layer, the fifth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as one electrode of a touch sensor (Figure 5, Ysl/150 is a fifth conductive layer over 145, where Ysl serves as one electrode of a touch sensor. See paragraphs [0047]-[0049].); a fourth insulating layer over the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 155 is a fourth insulating layer over Ysl/150.); and a sixth conductive layer over the fourth insulating layer, the sixth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a pixel electrode (Figure 5, 160 is a sixth conductive layer over 155, where 160 serves as a pixel electrode. See paragraph [0063].), wherein the first conductive layer and the semiconductor layer overlap each other (Figure 5 shows 120 and 113 overlap each other.), wherein the fourth conductive layer is electrically connected to the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 130 is electrically connected to Ysl/150. See paragraph [0060].), wherein the sixth conductive layer comprises a slit (Figure 5 shows pixel electrode 160 comprises a slit. See also Figure 4.), and wherein the sixth conductive layer is electrically connected to one of the second conductive layer and the third conductive layer (Figure 5, 160 is connected to 136 through the drain contact hole 157. See paragraph [0063].). Kim et al. fail to teach wherein the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer comprise the same material. Chen et al. disclose wherein a second conductive layer, a third conductive layer, and a fourth conductive layer comprise the same material (Paragraph [0021]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to “one of ordinary skill” in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teachings of Chen et al. to make the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer taught by Kim et al. comprise the same material. The motivation to combine would have been in order to reduce manufacturing time by forming the elements in the same fabrication process, thus easing manufacturing and cost. Regarding claim 2, Kim et al. and Chen et al. disclose the display device according to claim 1, wherein the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer are provided under the second insulating layer (Kim et al.: Figure 5, 133, 136 and 130 are all under 140.). Regarding claim 3, Kim et al. and Chen et al. disclose the display device according to claim 1, further comprising a coloring layer over the sixth conductive layer (Kim et al.: Figure 5, the color filter layer 175 [coloring layer] is over 160. See paragraph [0065].). Regarding claim 4, Kim et al. and Chen et al. disclose the display device according to claim 1, wherein the sixth conductive layer is provided in an opening of the fourth insulating layer (Kim et al.: Figure 5 shows 155 [fourth insulating layer] has a dip, i.e. “opening” where 160 [sixth conductive layer] is provided.). Regarding claim 5, Kim et al. and Chen et al. disclose the display device according to claim 1, wherein the sixth conductive layer is in direct contact with a top surface of the one of the second conductive layer and the third conductive layer (Kim et al.: Figure 5, 160 is in direct contact [through the contact hole] with a top surface of 136.). Regarding claim 7, Kim et al. disclose a display device (Figure 5) comprising: a semiconductor layer over a substrate, the semiconductor layer comprising a channel formation region (Figure 5, semiconductor layer 113 is over substrate 101. See paragraph [0053].); a first conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate electrode (Figure 5, 120 is a first conductive layer that serves as a gate electrode. See paragraph [0054].); a first insulating layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate insulating layer (Figure 5, 116 is a first insulating layer that serves as a gate insulating layer. See paragraph [0054].); a second insulating layer over the first insulating layer and the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, 140 is a second insulating layer over 116 and 113. See paragraph [0058].); a second conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer, the second conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a source electrode (Figure 5, 133 is a second conductive layer in contact with 140, where 133 serves as a source electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a third conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer, the third conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a drain electrode (Figure 5, 136 is a third conductive layer in contact with 140, where 136 serves as a drain electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a fourth conductive layer in contact with the second insulating layer (Figure 5, 130 is a fourth conductive layer in contact with 140. See paragraph [0056].); a third insulating layer over the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer (Figure 5, 145 is a third insulating layer over 133, 136 and 130. See paragraph [0058].); a fifth conductive layer over the third insulating layer, the fifth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as one electrode of a touch sensor (Figure 5, Ysl/150 is a fifth conductive layer over 145, where Ysl serves as one electrode of a touch sensor. See paragraphs [0047]-[0049].); a fourth insulating layer over the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 155 is a fourth insulating layer over Ysl/150.); and a sixth conductive layer over the fourth insulating layer, the sixth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a pixel electrode (Figure 5, 160 is a sixth conductive layer over 155, where 160 serves as a pixel electrode. See paragraph [0063].), wherein the first conductive layer and the semiconductor layer overlap each other (Figure 5 shows 120 and 113 overlap each other.), wherein the fourth conductive layer is electrically connected to the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 130 is electrically connected to Ysl/150. See paragraph [0060].), wherein the sixth conductive layer comprises a slit (Figure 5 shows pixel electrode 160 comprises a slit. See also Figure 4.), and wherein the sixth conductive layer is electrically connected to one of the second conductive layer and the third conductive layer (Figure 5, 160 is connected to 136 through the drain contact hole 157. See paragraph [0063].). Kim et al. fail to teach wherein the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer comprise the same material. Chen et al. disclose wherein a second conductive layer, a third conductive layer, and a fourth conductive layer comprise the same material (Paragraph [0021]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to “one of ordinary skill” in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teachings of Chen et al. to make the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer taught by Kim et al. comprise the same material. The motivation to combine would have been in order to reduce manufacturing time by forming the elements in the same fabrication process, thus easing manufacturing and cost. Regarding claim 8, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 2. Regarding claim 9, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 3. Regarding claim 10, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 4. Regarding claim 11, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 5. Regarding claim 13, Kim et al. disclose a display device (Figure 5) comprising: a semiconductor layer over a substrate, the semiconductor layer comprising a channel formation region (Figure 5, semiconductor layer 113 is over substrate 101. See paragraph [0053].); a first conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate electrode (Figure 5, 120 is a first conductive layer that serves as a gate electrode. See paragraph [0054].); a first insulating layer comprising a region configured to serve as a gate insulating layer (Figure 5, 116 is a first insulating layer that serves as a gate insulating layer. See paragraph [0054].); a second insulating layer over the first insulating layer and the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, 123 is a second insulating layer over 116 and 113. See paragraph [0055].); a second conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer, the second conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a source electrode (Figure 5, 133 is a second conductive layer in direct contact with 123, where 133 serves as a source electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a third conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer, the third conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a drain electrode (Figure 5, 136 is a third conductive layer in direct contact with 123, where 136 serves as a drain electrode. See paragraph [0052].); a fourth conductive layer in direct contact with the second insulating layer (Figure 5, 130 is a fourth conductive layer in direct contact with 123. See paragraph [0056].); a third insulating layer over and in direct contact with the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer (Figure 5, 140/145 is a third insulating layer over and in contact with 133, 136 and 130. See paragraph [0058].); a fifth conductive layer over and in direct contact with the third insulating layer, the fifth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as one electrode of a touch sensor (Figure 5, Ysl/150 is a fifth conductive layer over and in direct contact with 145, where Ysl serves as one electrode of a touch sensor. See paragraphs [0047]-[0049].); a fourth insulating layer over and in direct contact with the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 155 is a fourth insulating layer over and in contact with Ysl/150.); and a sixth conductive layer over and in direct contact with the fourth insulating layer, the sixth conductive layer comprising a region configured to serve as a pixel electrode (Figure 5, 160 is a sixth conductive layer over and in direct contact with 155, where 160 serves as a pixel electrode. See paragraph [0063].), wherein the first conductive layer and the semiconductor layer overlap each other (Figure 5 shows 120 and 113 overlap each other.), wherein the fourth conductive layer is electrically connected to the fifth conductive layer (Figure 5, 130 is electrically connected to Ysl/150. See paragraph [0060].), wherein the sixth conductive layer comprises a slit (Figure 5 shows pixel electrode 160 comprises a slit. See also Figure 4.), and wherein the sixth conductive layer is electrically connected to one of the second conductive layer and the third conductive layer (Figure 5, 160 is connected to 136 through the drain contact hole 157. See paragraph [0063].). Kim et al. fail to teach wherein the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer comprise the same material. Chen et al. disclose wherein a second conductive layer, a third conductive layer, and a fourth conductive layer comprise the same material (Paragraph [0021]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to “one of ordinary skill” in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teachings of Chen et al. to make the second conductive layer, the third conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer taught by Kim et al. comprise the same material. The motivation to combine would have been in order to reduce manufacturing time by forming the elements in the same fabrication process, thus easing manufacturing and cost. Regarding claim 15, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 3. Regarding claim 16, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 4. Regarding claim 17, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 5. Claims 6, 12 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) in view of Chen et al. (US 2011/0025969) and further in view of Kim et al. (US 2012/0218199). Regarding claim 6, Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) and Chen et al. disclose the display device according to claim 1. Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) and Chen et al. fail to teach wherein the first insulating layer is provided over the first conductive layer. Kim et al. (US 2012/0218199) discloses wherein a gate insulating layer [first insulating layer] is provided over the gate electrode [first conductive layer] (Paragraph [0064] and Figure 8B.). Thus, the combination of Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) and Chen et al., and Kim et al. (US 2012/0218199) each disclose a display device comprising a gate insulating layer and a gate electrode. A person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that the order of the gate insulating layer and a gate electrode [first insulating layer is over the first conductive layer] of Kim et al. (US 2012/0218199) could have been substituted for the order of the gate insulating layer and a gate electrode [first conductive layer over the first insulating layer] of the combination of Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) and Chen et al. because both allow for the precise voltage control over pixel switching. Furthermore, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been able to carry out the substitution. Finally, the substitution achieves the predictable result of providing precise voltage control over pixel switching. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the order of the gate insulating layer and a gate electrode [first insulating layer is over the first conductive layer] of Kim et al. (US 2012/0218199) for the order of the gate insulating layer and a gate electrode [first conductive layer over the first insulating layer] of the combination of Kim et al. (US 2011/0228188) and Chen et al. according to known methods to yield the predictable result of providing a gate insulating layer and a gate electrode. Regarding claim 12, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 6. Regarding claim 18, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN G SHERMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2941. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 4pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, AMR AWAD can be reached at (571)272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN G SHERMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621 25 February 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603045
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR REDUCING OUTPUT VARIATION FACTORS OF PIXEL CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597219
HEAD MOUNTABLE DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592044
Systems and Methods for Providing Real-Time Composite Video from Multiple Source Devices Featuring Augmented Reality Elements
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591302
GENERATING AI-CURATED AR CONTENT BASED ON COLLECTED USER INTEREST LABELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586407
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR ADJUSTING IMAGE PARAMETERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month