Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/076,911

A SINGLE RUN SYSTEM FOR RUNNING LINER AND SUSPENSION PLUG DOWN HOLE AND METHOD OF USING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Priority
Aug 22, 2024 — provisional 63/685,996
Examiner
MACDONALD, STEVEN A
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Import Tool Corporation Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
552 granted / 689 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
707
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 689 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/8/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/8/2026 was filed after the mailing date of the notice of allowance on 4/8/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to because The line quality of the figures poor (faint) and will not reproduce well. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because The abstract uses the terms “down hole” and “up hole”. Conventional spelling of these terms in the context of oil and gas wells is “downhole” and “uphole”. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The following title is suggested: SINGLE RUN SYSTEM FOR RUNNING LINER AND SUSPENSION PLUG DOWNHOLE AND METHOD OF USING SAME The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The body of the specification uses the terms “down hole”, “downhole” and “up hole”. Conventional spelling of these terms in the context of oil and gas wells is “downhole” and “uphole”. Furthermore the term “downhole” should be used consistently in the specification, as opposed to the use of “down hole” and “downhole”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 8 objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1 and 8 use the term “up hole” whereas the conventional term is “uphole”. (The examiner notes that the claims use the correct term “downhole” in the claims). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, claim 6 recites “wherein the top sub and the bottom sub detach when activated.” This is ambiguous and thus unclear. For better clarity it is suggested to amend this claims to “6. (Original) The single run system of claim 1, wherein the suspension plug setting tool comprises a top sub and a bottom sub, wherein the top sub and the bottom sub detach from each other when activated.” This suggested amendment is similar to claim 14. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 and 7-15 allowed. Claim 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN MACDONALD whose telephone number is (571)272-8763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571) 272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN A MACDONALD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698704
SURVEY TOOL SYSTEM FOR BLAST HOLE DRILLING RIGS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692763
Urethane Cement Retainer
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692759
ADJUSTABLE ELEMENT ENERGY RETENTION MECHANISM
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692782
HANGING PRODUCTION LOGGING TOOLS BELOW A CABLE DEPLOYED ELECTRIC SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687085
DOWNHOLE BALL RELEASE DEVICE
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 689 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month