Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/082,033

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAME DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING SPECIALIZED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GAME DESIGN SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Examiner
IANNUZZI, PETER J
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sierra Artificial Neural Networks
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
343 granted / 509 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 3-22, 25-44, 47-66 and 69-88 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on January 14, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 23, 24, 45, 46, 67 and 68 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Pub. 2024/0362968 by Lyons. Regarding claim 1, Lyons discloses a gaming method comprising: at least partially developing executable instructions or computer readable files related to a game of chance using an artificial intelligence game design system based upon machine learning training including (para. 19 – see AI and ML based creation of original gaming content): analyzing past game performance (para. 68-75 – see analysis of the game performance data prompts from the machine gameplay); utilizing a media encoding and transcoding router to (i) change input data type to a different media format or consolidate the input data type to a specific file type and (ii) direct the changed or consolidated input data type to a specific neural network in a transformer process (para. 47-67 – see transformation of data into prompts for processing); and selecting an output with a higher probability variable (para. 76 – see generation of original math content, see also better odds at para. 82); and utilizing the at least partially developed executable instructions or computer readable files to present and allow play of the game of chance for a gaming machine (para. 76-82 – see generation and presentation of math/paytable odds), the gaming machine including at least one of a monetary input device configured to receive a physical item associated with a monetary value and/or cashless wagering, a user interface, at least one processor for running the at least partially developed executable instructions or computer readable files related to the game of chance, a game display and memory in communication with the at least one processor and/or an online or mobile gaming platform, wherein the online or mobile gaming platform comprises a computing device, remote server, or cloud-based system that executes the at least partially developed and/or executable instructions to present and allow remote gameplay (fig. 2; para. 25-37 – see the display, processor, input device, value input/payment devices, etc.). Regarding claim 2, Lyons discloses the gaming method of claim 1 wherein the artificial intelligence game design system includes at least an artificial intelligence game math design system module utilizing at least partially supervised machine learning training to at least partially develop executable instructions or computer readable files for a game of chance (para. 76-82 – see generation and presentation of math/paytable odds; para. 89 – see training model control). Regarding claims 23, 24, 45, 46, 67 and 68, these claims are rejected as noted above regarding claims 1 and 2, mutatis mutandis. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER J IANNUZZI whose telephone number is (571)272-5793. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30AM-5:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at 571-270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER J IANNUZZI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592126
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ELECTRONIC GAMING INCLUDING GESTURE-BASED PLAYER CONSTRUCTED SYMBOL COMBINATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589304
METHOD AND AR GLASSES FOR AR GLASSES INTERACTIVE DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589311
PERFORMANCE PREDICTION FOR VIRTUALIZED GAMING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589290
FUNCTION BUTTON MODULE WITH VARIABLE FUNCTION LAYOUT AND GAME CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586442
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SINGLE ACCOUNT AND SINGLE WALLET FOR DISTRIBUTED GAMING SYSTEM ACROSS JURISDICTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month