Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/083,019

DATA SEQUENCE GENERATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Priority
Oct 16, 2019 — provisional 62/915,992 +2 more
Examiner
MEI, XU
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
723 granted / 847 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
856
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 847 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Application This communication is responsive to the applicant's application filed 05/21/2025. Claims 21-41 are pending. Claims 1-20 have been cancelled. Claim Objections Claim 23 is objected to because of the following informalities: parameter “2hr” in line 3 appears should be “hr”, see original filed specification para [0156]. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l) (1) - 706.02(l) (3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 21-41 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,080,302. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 21-41 of the current Application are broader than claims 1-19 in the patent. See 214 U.S.P.Q. 761 In re Van Ornum and Stanz. Below is a chart showing the similarities and differences of instant application independent claim 1; and U.S. Patent No. 12,080,302, independent claim 1. Regarding dependent claims 22-41, the claimed limitations are worded substantially the same as presented in dependent claims 2-19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,080,302. Claim limitations of claims 27 and 28 are presented in claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,080,302. 19/083,019 12,089,019 21. A filtering apparatus for audio signal filtering, the filtering apparatus comprising: processing circuitry; and memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuitry, wherein the filtering apparatus is configured to perform a method comprising: generating a pair of filters for a certain location specified by an elevation angle Ɵ and an azimuth angle φ, the pair of filters consisting of a right filter (hr(Ɵ, φ)) and a left filter (hI(Ɵ, φ); filtering an audio signal using the right filter; and filtering the audio signal using the left filter, wherein generating the pair of filters comprises: i) obtaining at least a first set of elevation basis function values at the elevation angle; ii) obtaining at least a first set of azimuth basis function values at the azimuth angle; iii) generating the right filter using: a) at least the first set of elevation basis function values, b) at least the first set of azimuth basis function values, and c) right filter model parameters; and iv) generating the left filter using: a) at least the first set of elevation basis function values, b) at least the first set of azimuth basis function values, and c) left filter model parameters. 1. A method for audio signal filtering, the method comprising: generating a pair of filters for a certain location specified by an elevation angle Ɵ and an azimuth angle φ, the pair of filters consisting of a right filter (hr(Ɵ, φ)) and a left filter (hI(Ɵ, φ); filtering an audio signal using the right filter; and filtering the audio signal using the left filter, wherein generating the pair of filters comprises: i) obtaining at least a first set of elevation basis function values at the elevation angle; ii) obtaining at least a first set of azimuth basis function values at the azimuth angle; iii) generating the right filter using: a) at least the first set of elevation basis function values, b) at least the first set of azimuth basis function values, and c) right filter model parameters; and iv) generating the left filter using: a) at least the first set of elevation basis function values, b) at least the first set of azimuth basis function values, and c) left filter model parameters, obtaining the first set of elevation basis function values comprises, for each elevation basis function included in a first set of elevation basis functions, evaluating the elevation basis function at the elevation angle to produce an elevation basis function value corresponding to the elevation angle and the elevation basis function, obtaining the first set of azimuth basis function values comprises, for each azimuth basis function included in a first set of azimuth basis functions, evaluating the azimuth basis function at the azimuth angle to produce an azimuth basis function value corresponding to the azimuth angle and the azimuth basis function, each of the elevation basis functions included in the first set of elevation basis functions is a B-spline basis function, and each of the azimuth basis functions included in the first set of azimuth basis functions is a periodic b-spline basis function. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Issued patent(s) 12,283,280 of parent application(s) 17/388,549 is made of record here as pertinent art to the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XU MEI whose telephone number is (571)272-7523. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 10-6:30 est. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached on 571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XU MEI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695 08/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738913
CONTENT-AWARE AUDIO LEVEL MANAGEMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730606
NOISE CLASSIFICATION FOR EVENT DETECTION
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726779
Apparatus, Methods and Computer Programs for Enabling Rendering of Spatial Audio
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12712509
TRANSIENTS MINIMIZATION OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS DUE TO MEMORY UPDATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713183
ESTIMATION OF AUDIO DEVICE AND SOUND SOURCE LOCATIONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+6.0%)
3y 3m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 847 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month