Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/090,080

CLEANING WIPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Examiner
GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Procter & Gamble Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
626 granted / 1019 resolved
-8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1066
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1019 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 25 November 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 21, 23-32, and 47-50 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Policicchio et al., US 10,694,915 in view of Yamada, WO 2006/070502 A1 (see also English translation), in view of Cameron et al., US 2015/0266633, in view of Broad et al., US 9,849,638, and in view of Ogale, US 2011/0041274. Regarding claim 21, Policicchio et al. disclose a product comprising a container (packaging, column 14 lines 52-55) and a plurality of cleaning wipes contained in the container (10), the cleaning wipes having a longitudinal axis (LA, see Figure 3A) extending between opposing transverse edges that cross the longitudinal axis and longitudinal edges spaced apart from the longitudinal axis and extend between the transverse edges (see Figures 1 and 3A), wherein the cleaning wipes each comprise: a first nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7) and comprising a plurality of first nonwoven strips extending from each nonwoven fixed ends (17), wherein said first nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A); and a second nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (another one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7), wherein said second nonwoven is joined to said first nonwoven along a central bonded portion (at 38, Figure 3A) and comprises a plurality of second nonwoven strips extending from second nonwoven fixed ends to second nonwoven free ends (17), wherein said second nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A), wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is below said first nonwoven (see Figures 2A-2B, bonding at 38); wherein second nonwoven strips are fluffed with said first nonwoven strips (when fluffed out of XY plane, deformed during use, column 8 lines 30-33; also see column 9 lines 55-67, column 13 lines 43-54); and wherein some of the structure of the wipes has first and second colors, wherein the first color differs from the second color in order to show contrast (column 13 lines 34-42). Regarding claims 23 and 26, the first nonwoven fixed ends are registered with the second nonwoven fixed ends (registered, in that they are bonded at 38 together, see Figures 1, 2A, 3A). Regarding claim 24, the first nonwoven strips are longer than said second nonwoven strips (in the embodiment of Figure 2B). Regarding claim 27, the cleaning wipes further comprise a backsheet forming at least part of a back surface of said cleaning wipes opposite said first nonwoven (12A, Figures 2A-2B), wherein the backsheet extends further away from the longitudinal axis than the central bonded portion (in the arrangement shown in Figure 2B). Regarding claim 28, the wiper further comprises an absorbent core (12B) positioned between a fluid acquisition layer (12C) and said backsheet (12A; Figures 2A-2B), wherein said fluid acquisition layer is between the absorbent core and said first nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B) and wherein each of the fluid acquisition layer, the absorbent core, and the backsheet extend along at least part of the longitudinal axis (Figure 1). Regarding claim 29, wherein said cleaning wipe further comprises: a third nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (another one of 27, Figures 1-2B), wherein said third nonwoven is joined directly or indirectly to said second nonwoven along said central bonded portion (Figures 2A-2B, at bonds 38) and comprises a plurality of third nonwoven strips extending from third nonwoven fixed ends (17, see Figures), wherein said third nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3), and wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is between said first nonwoven and said third nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B). Regarding claim 30, the third nonwoven strips extend further away from the longitudinal axis than said second nonwoven strips (in the arrangement where the third nonwoven strips 17 are on the third nonwoven that is centrally placed sheet 27 shown in Figure 2B). Regarding claim 31, more than about 10% by number of said second nonwoven strips are above portions of said first nonwoven strips (Figures 1-2B). Regarding claim 32, at least some of the first nonwoven strips are twisted (in embodiment described in column 10 lines 1-10). Regarding claim 47, Policicchio et al. disclose a product comprising a container (packaging, column 14 lines 52-55) and a plurality of cleaning wipes contained in the container (10), the cleaning wipes having a longitudinal axis (LA, see Figure 3A) extending between opposing transverse edges that cross the longitudinal axis and longitudinal edges spaced apart from the longitudinal axis and extend between the transverse edges (see Figures 1 and 3A), wherein the cleaning wipes each comprise: a first nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7) and comprising a plurality of first nonwoven strips extending from each nonwoven fixed ends (17), wherein said first nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A); and a second nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (another one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7), wherein said second nonwoven is joined to said first nonwoven along a central bonded portion (at 38, Figure 3A) and comprises a plurality of second nonwoven strips extending from second nonwoven fixed ends to second nonwoven free ends (17), wherein said second nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A), wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is below said first nonwoven (see Figures 2A-2B, bonding at 38); wherein at least some of the first nonwoven strips are back bent so that the first nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis (in that the nonwoven strips are formed in folds, with free ends oriented back towards the longitudinal axis as a result of the fold, see Figures 2A-2B); and wherein second nonwoven strips are fluffed with said first nonwoven strips (when fluffed out of XY plane, deformed during use, column 8 lines 30-33). Regarding claim 48, wherein said cleaning wipe further comprises: a third nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (another one of 27, Figures 1-2B), wherein said third nonwoven is joined directly or indirectly to said second nonwoven along said central bonded portion (Figures 2A-2B, at bonds 38) and comprises a plurality of third nonwoven strips extending from third nonwoven fixed ends (17, see Figures), wherein said third nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3), and wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is between said first nonwoven and said third nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B). Regarding claim 49, the third nonwoven strips extend further away from the longitudinal axis than said second nonwoven strips (in the arrangement where the third nonwoven strips 17 are on the third nonwoven that is centrally placed sheet 27 shown in Figure 2B). Regarding claim 50, Policicchio et al. disclose a product comprising a container (packaging, column 14 lines 52-55) and a plurality of cleaning wipes (10) contained in said container, wherein the cleaning wipes having a longitudinal axis (LA, see Figure 3A) extending between opposing transverse edges that cross the longitudinal axis and longitudinal edges spaced apart from the longitudinal axis and extend between the transverse edges (see Figures 1 and 3A), wherein said cleaning wipes each comprise: a first nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7) and comprising a plurality of first nonwoven strips extending from first nonwoven fixed ends (17), wherein said first nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1A and 3), and wherein at least some of said first nonwoven strips are back bent so that said first nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards said longitudinal axis (in that the nonwoven strips are formed in folds, with free ends oriented back towards the longitudinal axis as a result of the fold, see Figures 2A-2B; are also capable of being bent back during use); a second nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (another one of 27, see Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7), wherein said second nonwoven is joined to said first nonwoven along a central bonded portion (38, Figures 1-3) and comprises a plurality of second nonwoven strips extending from second nonwoven fixed ends to second nonwoven free ends (17), wherein said second nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1A and 3), wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is below said first nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B), and wherein at least some of said second nonwoven strips are back bent so that said second nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards said longitudinal axis (in that the nonwoven strips are formed in folds, with free ends oriented back towards the longitudinal axis as a result of the fold, see Figures 2A-2B); and a third nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (another one of 27, Figures 1-3), wherein said third nonwoven is joined directly or indirectly to said second nonwoven along said central bonded portion (via 38, see Figures) and comprises a plurality of third nonwoven strips extending from third nonwoven fixed ends (also 17, see Figures), wherein said third nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1A and 3), wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is between said first nonwoven and said third nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B), and wherein said third nonwoven strips extend further away from said longitudinal axis than said second nonwoven strips (Figures 2A-2B). Policicchio et al. does not disclose that the container is closed, or that wherein within the container at least some of the strips are bent back so that the first nonwoven strips are interlaced with the second nonwoven strips, wherein more than about 10% by number of the second nonwoven strips are bent so that said second nonwoven free ends are out of plane relative to said second nonwoven fixed ends, or specifically that the first nonwoven strips have a first color and that the second nonwoven strips have a second color, wherein the first color differs from the second color. Again, it is noted that some of the structure of the wipes has first and second colors, wherein the first color differs from the second color in order to show contrast (column 13 lines 34-42). Yamada teaches similar cleaning wipes, the wipe comprising first and second nonwoven layers (6, see English translation), the first and second nonwoven layers having strips with free and fixed ends (10, Figure 1), each of the layers can be of different (first and second) colors to improve the design of the wipe (English translation paragraph 0024, 0034). Cameron et al. teach a product that comprises a closed container (11) that contains a plurality of cleaning wipes (Figures 1-2; wipes can be household dusters and wipes, paragraph 0036), and teaches that it is desirable for the container to be a closed container with a lid is beneficial to allow a consumer to open the package easily and in a non-destructive manner, to withdraw the wipe, and reclose the package (paragraph 0006). Broad et al. relates to process and apparatus for fluffing a cleaning implement (Title) and teach a product comprising a container (package, see column 2 lines 16-21, column 5 lines 41-42, column 7 line 63 to column 8 line 7) and a plurality of cleaning wipes (10), the cleaning wipes comprise nonwoven layers with strips (layers 12 and 14, strips 17; see Figures 4A-4B; column 3 lines 47-57), and prior to the cleaning wipes being placed into a container the cleaning wipes are fluffed (at station 55 where air displaces the layers so that they become deformed or separated, see column 6 lines 55-64) and the strips are deformed due to fluffing (column 3 line 65 to column 4 line 7). Broad et al. recognize that when the wipes are placed in the container that it is after the fluffing step (column 7 line 63), and that the wipes may be compressed within the container and take up a relatively larger apparent volume when removed from the container, but the volume of the cleaning article will be greater than if fluffing had not occurred (column 7 line 64 to column 8 line 7). The fluffing of layers is done during manufacture so that the user removing the wipe from packaging will receive a wipe that is pre-fluffed in order to achieve an optimum cleaning performance (column 2 lines 16-47, particularly lines 40-47). Ogale teaches a cleaning wipe (1) of nonwoven layers having first and second nonwoven strips (nonwoven layers 20, strips referred to as ribbons, see paragraph [0014]) with free ends (at 24) and fixed ends (at 26, Figure 3), the strips are bent and interlaced (see Figures 1-4 where the strips cross over each other or are in a twisted relationship with other strips, “interlace” is defined by www.dictionary.com as “to cross one another, typically passing alternately over and under, as it woven together; intertwine”; see also paragraph [0007] that states where the strips or ribbons fan out and partially overlap) and are separated during manufacture (paragraph [0040]). Regarding claims 1, 25, and 50, more than 10% and 30% by number of the second nonwoven strips are bent so that the second nonwoven free ends are out of plane relative to nonwoven fixed ends and are above first nonwoven free ends (Figures 2-4 show far more than 10%, and more than 30%, of second strips that are bent in such a way that they are out of a plane and positioned above first nonwoven ends, see also paragraph [0023]). Further regarding claim 50, the free ends are bent back so they are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis (see Figures 2 and 4). This is done so that there is continuous contact between the strips and the surface being cleaned and increases the article’s cleaning capacity and also improves the shape of the cleaning wipe when compressed (paragraphs [0023]-[0024]). Also, the strips are bent so that major surfaces of the strips can fan out and rest on a contoured surface of an article to be cleaned without substantial tangling of strips (paragraph [0022]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the colors of the first and second nonwoven strips of Policicchio et al. so that they are of different colors, as taught by Yamada, to improve the visual design of the wipe and also it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the packaging of Policicchio et al. for one that is a closed container, such as the one taught by Cameron et al., so that a the container can be opened and reclosed in a non-destructive manner. Further it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the strips of the cleaning wipe of Policicchio et al. so that during manufacture they are fluffed into a voluminous shape where some first nonwoven strips are bent back when stored within the container, as taught by Broad et al., so that the finished product is fluffed before being placed in the container and is already fluffed when the user receives it to achieve the best cleaning performance with the cleaning wipe, and even further it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the second nonwoven strips of Policicchio and Broad et al. so that the second nonwoven strips are interlaced with the first nonwoven strips and more than about 10% or 30% by number of the second nonwoven strips are bent and/or twisted so that the second nonwoven free ends are out of a plane relative to the second nonwoven fixed ends and above the first nonwoven free ends, as taught by Ogale, so that the strips of the cleaning wipe have an increased cleaning capacity and retain a voluminous shape when compressed. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Policicchio et al., US 10,694,915, Yamada, WO 2006/070502 A1 (see also English translation), Cameron et al., US 2015/0266633, Broad et al., US 9,849,638, and Ogale, US 2011/0041274 as applied to claim 21 in view of Gummow et al., US 9,021,647. Policicchio et al., Yamada, Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale disclose all elements previously discussed above, however fail to disclose that when the first and second color are measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test, that according to the colors L*, a*, and b*, wherein said first color and said second color have a difference in color calculated using L*, a*, and b* values by the formula AE= [(L*x - L*y)2 + (a*x - a*y)2 + (b*x - b*y)2'2, wherein X represents said first nonwoven strips and Y represents said second nonwoven strips, wherein the ΔE between the first nonwoven strips and the second nonwoven strips is greater than 10. Gummow et al. teach a cleaning wipe where there are two color regions (300, 310; or 330, 340) to visually indicate to a user a function or characteristic of the wipe, the contrast being visually clear to a user (column 9 lines 42-58). Gummow et al. uses first and second color choices measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test such that the ΔE between the first and the second colors is greater than 10 (column 10 lines 56-67, column 11 lines 19-67). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the first and second colors used in the strips of Policicchio et al., Yamada, Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale so when measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test resulting in a ΔE between the first and the second colors is greater than 10, as taught by Gummow et al., in order to provide a desirable contrast between the first and second colors and to serve as a visual indicator. Claim(s) 33-34 and 37-46 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Policicchio et al., US 10,694,915, in view of Cameron et al., US 2015/0266633 and in view of Broad et al., US 9,849,638 further in view of Ogale, US 2011/0041274. Regarding claim 33, Policicchio et al. disclose a product comprising a container (packaging, column 14 lines 52-55) and a plurality of cleaning wipes contained in the container (10), the cleaning wipes having a longitudinal axis (LA, see Figure 3A) extending between opposing transverse edges that cross the longitudinal axis and longitudinal edges spaced apart from the longitudinal axis and extend between the transverse edges (see Figures 1 and 3A), wherein the cleaning wipes each comprise: a first nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7) and comprising a plurality of first nonwoven strips extending from each nonwoven fixed ends to nonwoven free ends (17, see Figures), wherein said first nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A); and a second nonwoven extending along the longitudinal axis (another one of 27, see also Figures 2A-2B, column 4 lines 5-7), wherein said second nonwoven is joined to said first nonwoven along a central bonded portion (at 38, Figure 3A) and comprises a plurality of second nonwoven strips extending from second nonwoven fixed ends to second nonwoven free ends (17), wherein the second nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3A), wherein along the central bonded portion said second nonwoven is below the first nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B); wherein at least some of the first nonwoven strips are back bent so that the first nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis (in that the nonwoven strips are formed in folds, with free ends oriented back towards the longitudinal axis as a result of the fold, see Figures 2A-2B). Regarding claim 34, wherein at least some of the second nonwoven strips are back bent so that the second nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis (in that the nonwoven strips are formed in folds, with free ends oriented back towards the longitudinal axis as a result of the fold, see Figures 2A-2B). Regarding claim 38, at least some of the first nonwoven strips are twisted (in embodiment described in column 10 lines 1-10). Regarding claim 39, the first nonwoven fixed ends are registered with the second nonwoven fixed ends (registered, in that they are bonded at 38 together, see Figures 1, 2A, 3A). Regarding claim 40, the first nonwoven strips are longer than said second nonwoven strips (in the embodiment of Figure 2B). Regarding claim 42, the cleaning wipes further comprise a backsheet forming at least part of a back surface of said cleaning wipes opposite said first nonwoven (12A, Figures 2A-2B), wherein the backsheet extends further away from the longitudinal axis than the central bonded portion (in the arrangement shown in Figure 2B). Regarding claim 43, the wiper further comprises an absorbent core (12B) positioned between a fluid acquisition layer (12C) and said backsheet (12A; Figures 2A-2B), wherein said fluid acquisition layer is between the absorbent core and said first nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B) and wherein each of the fluid acquisition layer, the absorbent core, and the backsheet extend along at least part of the longitudinal axis (Figure 1). Regarding claim 44, wherein said cleaning wipe further comprises: a third nonwoven extending along said longitudinal axis (another one of 27, Figures 1-2B), wherein said third nonwoven is joined directly or indirectly to said second nonwoven along said central bonded portion (Figures 2A-2B, at bonds 38) and comprises a plurality of third nonwoven strips extending from third nonwoven fixed ends (17, see Figures), wherein said third nonwoven fixed ends are oriented towards said longitudinal axis (Figures 1 and 3), and wherein along said central bonded portion said second nonwoven is between said first nonwoven and said third nonwoven (Figures 2A-2B). ). Regarding claim 45, the third nonwoven strips extend further away from the longitudinal axis than said second nonwoven strips (in the arrangement where the third nonwoven strips 17 are on the third nonwoven that is centrally placed sheet 27 shown in Figure 2B). Regarding claim 46, more than about 10% by number of said second nonwoven strips are above portions of said first nonwoven strips (Figures 1-2B). Policicchio et al. does not disclose that the container is closed or that wherein within the container at least some of the first nonwoven strips are bent back so that the first nonwoven strips are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis. Regarding claim 41, there is not a % disclose by how many of the second nonwoven strips are bent. Cameron et al. teach a product that comprises a closed container (11) that contains a plurality of cleaning wipes (Figures 1-2; wipes can be household dusters and wipes, paragraph 0036), and teaches that it is desirable for the container to be a closed container with a lid is beneficial to allow a consumer to open the package easily and in a non-destructive manner, to withdraw the wipe, and reclose the package (paragraph 0006). Regarding claim 37, the container comprises an intact frangible opening feature and it is a sealed container (paragraph 0021-0023, frangible at perforations 30, also sealing features 25). Broad et al. relates to process and apparatus for fluffing a cleaning implement (Title) and teach a product comprising a container (package, see column 2 lines 16-21, column 5 lines 41-42, column 7 line 63 to column 8 line 7) and a plurality of cleaning wipes (10), the cleaning wipes comprise nonwoven layers with strips (layers 12 and 14, strips 17; see Figures 4A-4B; column 3 lines 47-57), and prior to the cleaning wipes being placed into a container the cleaning wipes are fluffed (at station 55 where air displaces the layers so that they become fluffed, see column 6 lines 55-64) so that as a result the strips are fluffed (column 3 line 65 to column 4 line 7). Broad et al. recognize that when the wipes are placed in the container that it is after the fluffing step (column 7 line 63), and that the wipes may be compressed within the container and take up a relatively larger apparent volume when removed from the container, but the volume of the cleaning article will be greater than if fluffing had not occurred (column 7 line 64 to column 8 line 7). The fluffing of layers is done during manufacture so that the user removing the wipe from packaging will receive a wipe that is pre-fluffed in order to achieve an optimum cleaning performance (column 2 lines 16-47, particularly lines 40-47). Ogale teaches a cleaning wipe (1) of nonwoven layers having first and second nonwoven strips (nonwoven layers 20, strips referred to as ribbons, see paragraph [0014]) with free ends (at 24) and fixed ends (at 26, Figure 3), the strips are bent and interlaced(see Figures 1-4 where the strips cross over each other or are in a twisted relationship with other strips, “interlace” is defined by www.dictionary.com as “to cross one another, typically passing alternately over and under, as it woven together; intertwine”; see also paragraph [0007] that states where the strips or ribbons fan out and partially overlap) and are separated during manufacture (paragraph [0040]). Further regarding claim 33, at least some of the first nonwoven strips are bent back so that the first nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis (Figures 2 and 4). Regarding claim 41, more than 10% and 30% by number of the second nonwoven strips are bent so that the second nonwoven free ends are out of plane relative to nonwoven fixed ends and are above first nonwoven free ends (Figures 2-4 show far more than 10% of second strips that are bent in such a way that they are out of a plane and positioned above first nonwoven ends, see also paragraph [0023]). This is done so that there is continuous contact between the strips and the surface being cleaned and increases the article’s cleaning capacity and also improves the shape of the cleaning wipe when compressed (paragraphs [0023]-[0024]). Also, the strips are bent so that major surfaces of the strips can fan out and rest on a contoured surface of an article to be cleaned without substantial tangling of strips (paragraph [0022]). Further regarding claim 41, the fixed ends are located at bonds (38) and the free ends of the strips of the nonwoven layers (17) may be deformed out of an XY plane due to fluffing or deformations in use (column 8 lines 30-36). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the packaging of Policicchio et al. for one that is a closed container, such as the one taught by Cameron et al., so that a the container can be opened and reclosed in a non-destructive manner. Further it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the strips of the cleaning wipe of Policicchio et al. so that during manufacture they are fluffed where some first nonwoven strips are bent back when stored within the container, as taught by Broad et al., so that fluffing takes place during manufacture and the finished product is fluffed before being placed in the container so that it is fluffed when the user receives it to achieve the best cleaning performance with the cleaning wipe, and even further it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the second nonwoven strips of Policicchio and Broad et al. so that the second nonwoven strips are interlaced and at least some of the first nonwoven strips are bent back so that the first nonwoven free ends are oriented back towards the longitudinal axis, as taught by Ogale, so that the strips of the cleaning wipe have an increased cleaning capacity and retain a voluminous shape when compressed. Regarding claim 41, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the second nonwoven strips of Policiccio et al. as modified by Cameron et al. and Broad et al. so that more than about 10% by number of the second nonwoven strips are bent so that the second nonwoven free ends are out of plane relative to the second nonwoven fixed ends, as taught by Ogale, to provide a configuration of strips that can fan out and fluff so as to clean an article without the strips tangling. Claim(s) 35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Policicchio et al., US 10,694,915, Cameron et al., US 2015/0266633, Broad et al., US 9,849,638, and Ogale, US 2011/0041274 as applied to claim 33, in view of Yamada, WO 2006/070502 A1 (see also English translation). Policicchio et al., Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale disclose all elements previously discussed above, however fail to disclose that the first nonwoven strips have a first color and said second nonwoven strips have a second color, wherein the first color differs from the second color. In Policicchio et al. some of the structure of the wipes has first and second colors, wherein the first color differs from the second color in order to show contrast (column 13 lines 34-42). Yamada teaches similar cleaning wipes, the wipe comprising first and second nonwoven layers (6, see English translation), the first and second nonwoven layers having strips with free and fixed ends (10, Figure 1), each of the layers can be of different (first and second) colors to improve the design of the wipe (English translation paragraph 0024, 0034). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the colors of the first and second nonwoven strips of Policicchio et al., Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale so that they are of different colors, as taught by Yamada, to improve the design of the wipe. Claim(s) 36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Policicchio et al., US 10,694,915, Cameron et al., US 2015/0266633, Broad et al., US 9,849,638, and Ogale, US 2011/0041274 as applied to claim 33 in view of Yamada, WO 2006/070502 A1 (see also English translation) and in further view of Gummow et al., US 9,021,647. Policicchio et al., Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale disclose all elements previously discussed above, however fail to disclose that the first nonwoven strips have a first color and said second nonwoven strips have a second color, wherein the first color differs from the second color and that when the first and second color are measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test, that according to the colors L*, a*, and b*, wherein said first color and said second color have a difference in color calculated using L*, a*, and b* values by the formula AE= [(L*x - L*y)2 + (a*x - a*y)2 + (b*x - b*y)2'2, wherein X represents said first nonwoven strips and Y represents said second nonwoven strips, wherein the ΔE between the first nonwoven strips and the second nonwoven strips is greater than 10. Policicchio et al. some of the structure of the wipes has first and second colors, wherein the first color differs from the second color in order to show contrast (column 13 lines 34-42). Yamada teaches similar cleaning wipes, the wipe comprising first and second nonwoven layers (6, see English translation), the first and second nonwoven layers having strips with free and fixed ends (10, Figure 1), each of the layers can be of different (first and second) colors to improve the design of the wipe (English translation paragraph 0024, 0034). Gummow et al. teach a cleaning wipe where there are two color regions (300, 310; or 330, 340) to visually indicate to a user a function or characteristic of the wipe, the contrast being visually clear to a user (column 9 lines 42-58). Gummow et al. uses first and second color choices measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test such that the ΔE between the first and the second colors is greater than 10 (column 10 lines 56-67, column 11 lines 19-67). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the colors of the first and second nonwoven strips of Policicchio et al., Cameron et al., Broad et al., and Ogale so that they are of different colors, as taught by Yamada, to improve the design of the wipe and further it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the first and second colors used in the strips of Policicchio et al., Cameron et al., Broad et al., Ogale, and Yamada so when measured by a Hunter Reflectance Meter test resulting in a ΔE between the first and the second colors is greater than 10, as taught by Gummow et al., in order to provide a desirable contrast between the first and second colors and to serve as a visual indicator. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 25 November 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 21-50 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, these rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in further view of Ogale, US 2011/0041274, now additionally applied to the previous rejections under 35 USC 103. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Laura C Guidotti whose telephone number is (571)272-1272. The examiner can normally be reached typically M-F, 6am-9am, 10am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at 313-446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA C GUIDOTTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 lcg
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2025
Application Filed
May 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 07, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575919
ELECTRICAL BODY CARE BRUSH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12551004
TOOTHBRUSH WITH DETACHABLE BRUSH HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544810
TELESCOPIC ADAPTER DEVICE FOR DREDGING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546429
JETTING-BASED PIPELINE SCRAPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539204
PERSONAL CARE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+30.4%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1019 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month