Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/093,139

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND INTERFACE DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2025
Examiner
MISHLER, ROBIN J
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 707 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-14 and 16-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung (US 2020/0201505) in view of Hisano (US 10,845,899). Regarding claim 1, Jung discloses an interface device comprising: an electronic device (110, fig. 10); and an input device (20, fig. 10) communicating with the electronic device (para. 159-160, 162-163), wherein the electronic device comprising: a display layer (110 in fig. 2) operating in a unit of display frame (see Display Frame in fig. 6) comprising a blank period (see Blank in fig. 6 and para. 135) and a data period (DP in fig. 6 and para. 132, 135); a sensor layer (120, fig. 2) disposed on the display layer (see fig. 2) and operating in a first mode to sense a first input generated by the input device (see touch sensing period in para. 79); and a sensor driver (300, fig. 2) driving the sensor layer (para. 86) and transmitting an uplink signal to the input device (para. 85), wherein the input device transmits a plurality of first downlink signals (para. 162) comprising first information (see Data in fig. 12 and para. 182) and a plurality of second downlink signals comprising second information (see Position in fig. 12 and para. 182) different from the first information, and wherein the sensor driver successively receives the plurality of first downlink signals during the blank period (see Data in fig. 12, wherein data is received during blanking period LHB3 in the first frame, also see para. 184) and successively receives the plurality of second downlink signals (see Position in fig. 12). Jung fails to disclose wherein the sensor driver received a plurality of second downlink signals during the data period. Hisano discloses wherein the sensor driver successively receives the plurality of first downlink signals (P1+ in fig. 2) during the blank period (see BP1 in display controller 2(b) in fig. 2) and successively receives the plurality of second downlink signals (P2 in fig. 2) during the data period (see DP to the right of BP1 in display controller 2(b) in fig. 2). When the invention was made (pre-AIA ) or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include the teachings of Hisano in the device of Jung. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide the display the ability to adjust the location of the blanking period without transmitting a second uplink signal (Hisano; see col. 6, lines 34-39 and col. 6-7, lines 64-8, wherein the display quality is reduced when providing a second uplink signal to adjust the timings of the blank periods). Ultimately wherein the versatility of the display improves the overall maintained quality of the display. Regarding claim 2, Jung discloses wherein the input device comprises: a receiver (2623 in fig. 8) receiving the uplink signal (para. 138); a transmitter (2622, fig. 8) transmitting the plurality of first downlink signals and the plurality of second downlink signals to the sensor driver (para. 138); and a power supply (2630 in fig. 8) supplying a power to the input device. Regarding claim 3, Jung discloses wherein the first information comprises information about the input device (para. 182 and fig. 12) and the second information comprises a signal to determine coordinate information of the input device (para. 182 and fig. 12). Regarding claim 4, Jung discloses wherein the sensor layer further operates in a second mode (see finger sensing in fig. 12 and para. 190) different from the first mode and sensing a second input generated by a user's body (para. 190). Regarding claim 5, Jung discloses wherein the sensor layer operates in the second mode during the blank period (see finger sensing in fig. 12 during blank period LHB4). Regarding claim 6, Jung discloses wherein the second mode comprises a first touch mode and a second touch mode (para. 95, 99; wherein touch is detected through mutual or self capacitance), wherein the sensor layer senses the user's body based on a self-capacitance in the first touch mode (para. 99) and senses the user's body based on a mutual capacitance in the second touch mode (para. 95). Regarding claim 7, Hisano discloses wherein each of the plurality of second downlink signals operates in a burst mode (see col. 3, lines 44-48). When the invention was made (pre-AIA ) or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include the teachings of Hisano in the device of Jung. The motivation for doing so would have been to allow the display controller to detect the position of the active stylus (Hisano; col. 3, lines 44-48). Regarding claim 8, Jung discloses wherein each of the plurality of second downlink signals has a same driving period (see periods of multiple Data in fig. 12). Regarding claim 9, Jung discloses wherein each of the plurality of first downlink signals has at least two different waveforms (para. 186). Regarding claim 10, Jung discloses wherein the plurality of first downlink signals comprise at least one first waveform and at least one second waveform (para. 186), and wherein the second waveform is obtained by shifting the first waveform by a predetermined phase (para. 186, 212). Regarding claim 11, Jung discloses wherein a number of rising edges of the plurality of first downlink signals is smaller than a number of rising edges of the plurality of second downlink signals (para. 186, 212). Regarding claim 12, Jung discloses wherein the electronic device further comprises a timing controller (170, fig. 2) to drive the display layer (para. 92), the timing controller generates a length signal based on a length of the blank period and a length of the data period (see fig. 6), and the timing controller transmits the length signal to the sensor driver (see fig. 6 and para. 85). Regarding claim 13, Jung discloses wherein the sensor driver receives the length signal and receives the plurality of first downlink signals and the plurality of second downlink signals based on the length signal (see fig. 12 and para. 172). Regarding claim 14, Jung discloses wherein the input device generates the plurality of first downlink signals (see Position in fig. 12) and the plurality of second downlink signals (see Data in fig. 12) in response to the uplink signal (para. 182). Claim 16 is rejected for the same reasons stated for claim 1. See above rejection. Claims 17-26 are rejected for the same reasons stated for claims 4-13, respectively. See above rejections. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBIN J MISHLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7251. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN PATEL can be reached at (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBIN J MISHLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598714
LOCKING STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596453
TOUCH SENSOR AND A METHOD FOR DETECTING A USER'S TOUCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585351
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568688
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567184
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month