Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/096,690

COMPARATIVE SEARCHING IN A REAL ESTATE SEARCH ENGINE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Priority
Nov 19, 2021 — provisional 63/281,272 +1 more
Examiner
CHANG, EDWARD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
R E Data Lab Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 12m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
343 granted / 542 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
559
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§103
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 542 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims This action is in reply to the application filed on 31st of March 2025. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 2. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,271,967. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to operating a real estate investment search system to perform comparative searching. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-3092. The examiner can normally be reached M - F, 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Gart can be reached on 571-272-3955. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3696 0724/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700041
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND UPDATING AN INVENTORY OF PERSONAL POSSESSIONS OF A USER FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700034
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OFFERING A CREDIT PRODUCT BY A CREDIT ISSUER TO A CONSUMER AT A POINT-OF-SALE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700043
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING AN EVENT AND RESULTING DAMAGE USING CROWDSOURCED DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12682401
Systems and Methods for Generating a Home Score and Modifications for a User
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670530
DIGITAL SYSTEM COMPRISING FINITE STATE MACHINE ENGINES FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF FLEXIBLE CONFIGURABLE INDIVIDUAL POLICIES SEGMENTED BY LIFE-CYCLE STATES, INTER ALIA, USING A SLICED ADMISSION CONTROL TRIGGERED BY UNSCHEDULED SUM COVER INCREASE, AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+32.1%)
3y 4m (~1y 12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 542 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month