Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/101,481

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING LOCATION REPORTING TYPE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 05, 2025
Priority
Aug 05, 2022 — CN PCT/CN2022/110512 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, CONGVAN
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1058 granted / 1185 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1201
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§102
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1185 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to Pre-Amendments filed on Feb. 05, 2025. Claims 13-22 and 24-27 have been canceled. Claims 1-12 and 23 have been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-12 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ryu et al. (2023/0413225). Regarding claims 1 and 23, Ryu discloses a method (200) performed by a first network node (see abstract, fig,13, element 1320, fig.24, element BS, paragraphs [0015], [0026], [0178], [0183], [0247] and its description), comprising: receiving, (S202) from a second network node, a message indicating a plurality of location reporting request types (see abstract, fig.24, element AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0247], [0251] and its description); and reporting (S204) a location of a terminal device to the second network node, when a location reporting request type in the plurality of location reporting request types is satisfied (see abstract, fig.24, WD, BS, AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0247], [0251-0252] and its description). Regarding claim 2, Ryu further discloses wherein the message includes a first information element, IE, indicating a first location reporting request type (see paragraph [0110]), and a second IE indicating a second location reporting request type (see paragraphs [0066], [0110]). Regarding claim 3, Ryu further discloses wherein the first location reporting request type is at least one of a change of serving cell and a UE presence in the area of interest (see paragraph [0065]); and wherein the second location reporting request type is at least one of the UE presence in the area of interest and the change of serving cell (see paragraph [0065], [0128]). Regarding claim 4, Ryu further discloses wherein the first IE is a location reporting request type IE (see paragraphs [0040], [0110]); and wherein the second IE is an additional location reporting request type list (see paragraphs [0040], [0065], [0110], [0128]). Regarding claim 5, Ryu further discloses wherein the second IE indicates one or more location reporting request types (see paragraphs [0065], [0110]). Regarding claim 6, Ryu further discloses wherein the message includes a location reporting request type IE, including an enumerated value indicating a first location reporting request type and a second location reporting request type (see abstract paragraphs [0026], [0247], [0251-0252] and its description). Regarding claim 8, Ryu further discloses wherein the message is transmitted via a next generation application protocol, NGAP, interface (see paragraphs [0251], [0283]). Regarding claim 9, Ryu further discloses wherein the message is at least one of: a location reporting control message; an initial context setup request message; and a handover request message (see paragraphs [0065], [0128]). Regarding claim 10, Ryu further discloses wherein the message is for triggering a location report when at least one of: the terminal device is in a connected mode; the terminal device is reconnected; and a N2-based handover happens for the terminal device (see fig.24, element WD, paragraphs [0065-0066], [0128]). Regarding claim 11, Ryu further discloses wherein the first network node is in a next generation-radio access network, NG-RAN; and wherein the second network node is an access and mobility management function, AMF (see abstract, fig.24, elements BS, AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0247], [0251] and its description). Regarding claim 12, Ryu discloses a method performed by a second network node (see abstract, fig.24, element AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0251] and description), comprising: transmitting (S302) to a first network node, a message indicating a plurality of location reporting request types (see abstract, fig.24, elements BS, AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0251] and description); wherein the message indicates the first network node to report a location of a terminal device to the second network node, when a location reporting request type in the plurality of location reporting request types is satisfied (see abstract, fig.24, elements WD, BS, AMF/MME, paragraphs [0026], [0247], [0251-0252] and its description). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this Office Action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CongVan Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-7871. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached on (571) 270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 100 100 media_image1.png Greyscale UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE /CONGVAN TRAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750639
Text Alternative To Established Voice Call Session
5y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744648
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REPORTING CONFIGURED GRANT RESOURCE USAGE STATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738999
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739655
Handoff Matching in a Network Mesh
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732797
IDENTIFICATION OF REDUCED CAPABILITY USER EQUIPMENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1185 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month