Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/102,330

SCREW FOR DIRECT SCREWING INTO A COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 07, 2025
Priority
Aug 24, 2022 — DE 10 2022 121 435.4 +1 more
Examiner
SAETHER, FLEMMING
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ejot SE & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1089 granted / 1671 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1671 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 29-56 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In each of claims 29, 31, 46 and 52, “in particular” in indefinite. In claim 29, lines 15, 16 and 17, the “UP1” and “UP2” are not consistent with the respective load and guide flank. In claim 29, the last paragraph there is no antecedent basis for “the respective intersection point”; it should be clarified that it is each intersection point and associated transition point that defines a distance. In lines 18 and 20 the “LF” and “FF” were not found in the drawings. In claim 31, there is no antecedent basis for “the respective connecting line”. In claim 36, there is no antecedent basis for “the numerical eccentricity”. In claim 38, there is no antecedent basis for “the distance” and “the pitch”. In claim 42, there is no antecedent basis for “the percentage protrusion”. In claim 45, there is no antecedent basis for “the base thread radius”. In claim 50, “a preforming elevation” is a double inclusion and suggested should be --one of the preforming elevations-- and “the nearest” and “the beginning” lack antecedent basis. In claim 54, “the pitch” and “the increase” lack antecedent basis. The claims should be further reviewed and revised accordingly to ensure complete compliance with section 112. The claims were examined as best understood. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 29-59 appear would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: in the context of the claim invention the prior art does not disclose a thread profile with an ellipse shaped crest having a relatively narrow profile as required by the limitation of the distances between the transition and intersection points being less than 90% the distance from the intersection points and the ellipse apex. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Subenbach (US 7,658,581), Otten (US 10,036,413), Prichard (US 8,684,646), Chu (US 11,313,401) and Oliver (US 3,394,626) are all cited to teach threads with a curved crest and a relatively narrow profile but none teach an ellipse shape. Yamaki (US 7,780,388), Williams (US 5,141,379), Skierski (US 3,831,415), Okuwaki (US 10,954,985) and Kahn (US 3,213,742) are all cited to teach thread elevations at a screw tip region. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FLEMMING SAETHER whose telephone number is (571)272-7071. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 - 7:00 eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Mills can be reached at 571-272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FLEMMING SAETHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767064
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL ADJUSTABLE FASTENER
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753641
PART UNIT AND STRUCTURE FOR ASSEMBLING VEHICLE BODY
2y 12m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747750
LOCKNUT
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734576
AN IMPROVED SCREW AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736079
Quarter Turn Retainer
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+27.8%)
2y 11m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month