Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/103,274

METHOD FOR CHECKING AND VERIFYING THE CORRECT STRIPPING PROCESS OF THE INSULATING LAYER IN PREDEFINED SECTIONS OF A CONDUCTING WIRE COVERED BY A LAYER OF DIELECTRIC MATERIAL, AND RELATED ASSEMBLY FOR CHECKING AND VERIFYING

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Feb 12, 2025
Examiner
SHIBRU, HELEN
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Atop S P A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
443 granted / 756 resolved
+0.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 756 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 35 U.S.C. 101 requires that a claimed invention must fall within one of the four eligible categories of invention (i.e. process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter) and must not be directed to subject matter encompassing a judicially recognized exception as interpreted by the courts. MPEP 2106. The four eligible categories of invention include: (1) process which is an act, or a series of acts or steps, (2) machine which is an concrete thing, consisting of parts, or of certain devices and combination of devices, (3) manufacture which is an article produced from raw or prepared materials by giving to these materials new forms, qualities, properties, or combinations, whether by hand labor or by machinery, and (4) composition of matter which is all compositions of two or more substances and all composite articles, whether they be the results of chemical union, or of mechanical mixture, or whether they be gases, fluids, powders or solids. MPEP 2106(I). Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as not falling within one of the four statutory categories of invention because the broadest reasonable interpretation of the instant claims in light of the specification encompasses software which is transitory signals per se. Transitory signals are not within one of the four statutory categories (i.e. process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter). See MPEP 2106(I). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-22 and 24-28 are allowed. The following is an Examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The present invention is directed to checking and verifying the correct stripping process in particular sections of a conducting wire wherein the method includes extracting features of captured images to verify a correct dimension and/ or positions of residues of dielectric material. The independent claims recite the uniquely distinct features “tagging the advancing conducting wire having been stripped off stripped sections, said tagging comprising acquiring information related to a position and/or a time at a predefined sampling rate; acquiring images of said conducting wire by at least one video camera arranged proximal to and facing at least one face of said conducting wire; - associating the images acquired by said at least one video camera with a respective tagging information acquired for a same point on said conducting wire; extracting features from the images acquired by said at least one video camera and comparing them with respective reference features to verify a correct linear dimension and/or relative position and/or absence of residues of dielectric material on a surface of each stripped section along the conducting wire” and/or “at least one encoder configured to detect an instantaneous position of the advancement of said conducting wire, with consequent temporal and/or positional tagging of said position, said at least one encoder being configured to generate a signal output of each performed tagging, - at least one video camera configured to be arranged downstream of said first station and upstream of said second station, said at least one video camera being configured to be aligned with at least one face of said conducting wire and being configured to acquire images of said advancing conducting wire, and - a control and management unit configured for synchronization of a frequency of the images acquired by said at least one video camera with the signal output from said encoder, for a positional and/or temporal tagging of each image and a consequent unique association thereof with a corresponding region of said conducting wire, and for a feature extraction of the acquired images and a comparison thereof with reference features.” The closest prior arts Tillotson et al. (US Pat. No. 11, 933, 736); KIHARA (US PG PUB 20120304461); YANG et al. (US G PUB 2017/0153372); and Ray et al. (US Pat. No. 9, 612, 210) either singularly or in combination fail to anticipate or render the above highlighted limitations obvious as explicitly recited in the claims in the specific sequence. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELEN SHIBRU whose telephone number is (571)272-7329. The examiner can normally be reached M-TR 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THAI TRAN can be reached at 571 272 7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELEN SHIBRU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484 February 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603970
METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING LYRIC EFFECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603112
VIDEO GENERATION METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586375
Content Validation Using Scene Modification
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12563277
USER-CUSTOMIZED ALREADY VIEWED VIDEO SUMMARY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562194
METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND MEDIUM FOR GENERATING A VIDEO
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+3.7%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 756 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month