Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/108,616

CONTROL DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Priority
Sep 09, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022033936
Examiner
LEE, NICHOLAS J
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
788 granted / 960 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
973
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
82.6%
+42.6% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 960 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 7, 12, 15, 17, 20-21 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 11 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a2 as being anticipated by US Patent Pub. 2006/0103611 A1 to Choi. As to claim 1, Choi discloses a control device (See Fig. 2, 110, 120, 150) for a display panel in which multiple display units each including a first light-emitting element and a second light-emitting element are arranged along n rows and m columns (See Fig. 2, 140; The pixels 140 including first light-emitting elements OLED (Fig. 4) in the first rows connected to ELVDDo and second light-emitting elements in the second rows connected to ELVDDe.), where m and n are natural numbers of two or more, the display panel including multiple first drive circuits (See Fig. 4, 142) each including the first light-emitting element (OLED 140), the control device comprising: a control unit (Fig. 2, 150) configured to cause the display panel to display an image based on input image data (¶ 0035), during the write period, performs writing of data to the multiple first drive circuits based on the input image data (See Fig. 5A; ¶ 0047, “the data signals are charged in the pixels 140 of the odd horizontal lines (non-emission period: off)”), during the light emission period, causes the multiple first light-emitting elements to emit light (See Fig. 5B; ¶ 0049, “Then, predetermined light is generated only by the pixels 140 of the odd horizontal lines in the (i+1).sup.th frame”), and during at least part of the write period, causes the multiple second light-emitting elements to emit light (¶ 0047, “That is, the pixels 140 of the even horizontal lines generate light in response to the voltages charged in an (i-1).sup.th frame (emission period: on) in a period where the voltages corresponding to the data signals are charged in the pixels 140 of the odd horizontal lines (non-emission period: off)”). As to claim 5, Choi discloses wherein the control unit during the write period, sequentially performs writing of data to the multiple second drive circuits based on the input image data for the n rows, row by row (¶ 0047, “That is, the pixels 140 of the even horizontal lines generate light in response to the voltages charged in an (i-1).sup.th frame (emission period: on) in a period where the voltages corresponding to the data signals are charged in the pixels 140 of the odd horizontal lines (non-emission period: off)”), and during the write period and at least part of the light emission period, causes the multiple second light-emitting elements to sequentially emit light at least row by row out of the n rows (¶ 0049, “That is, the pixels 140 of the odd horizontal lines generate light in response to the voltages charged in the i.sup.th frame in a period where the voltages corresponding to the data signals are charged in the pixels 140 of the even horizontal lines”). As to claim 11, Choi discloses wherein the first light-emitting element is any one of a quantum dot light-emitting diode including a light-emitting layer including quantum dots, an organic light-emitting diode including an organic light-emitting layer (¶ 0041), and an inorganic light-emitting diode including an inorganic light-emitting layer, and the second light-emitting element is any one of a quantum dot light-emitting diode including a light-emitting layer including quantum dots, an organic light-emitting diode including an organic light-emitting layer (¶ 0041), and an inorganic light-emitting diode including an inorganic light-emitting layer. As to claim 16, Choi discloses a display device comprising: the control device according to claim 1 (See the rejection of claim 1); and the display panel (Fig. 2, 130), wherein the display panel includes a substrate, and the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element do not overlap in a plan view (See Fig. 2; The light emitting elements 140 for odd rows (E1, E3, …) do not overlap with the light emitting elements 140 for the even rows (E2, E4, …). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Pub. 2006/0103611 A1 to Choi in view of US Patent Pub. 2012/0249615 A1 to Lee. As to claim 4, Choi fails to disclose wherein the first light-emitting element is PWM driven such that luminance is controlled by changing a current flow time while keeping an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element constant, or the first light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element; the second light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element, the display panel includes multiple second drive circuits each including the second light-emitting element, and the control unit sequentially performs writing of data to the multiple second drive circuits based on the input image data for the n rows, row by row, and sequentially causes the multiple second light-emitting elements included in the multiple second drive circuits in a row in which the writing is completed to emit light. Lee discloses wherein the first light-emitting element is PWM driven such that luminance is controlled by changing a current flow time while keeping an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element constant, or the first light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element (See Fig. 1A, First field; ¶ 0126, “the driving transistor ETR controls a driving current supplied to the organic light emitting diode”), the second light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element (See Fig. 1A, Second field; ¶ 0126, “the driving transistor ETR controls a driving current supplied to the organic light emitting diode”), the display panel includes multiple second drive circuits each including the second light-emitting element (See Fig. 3B; OPX), and the control unit sequentially performs writing of data to the multiple second drive circuits based on the input image data for the n rows, row by row (See Fig. 1A, Second field, scan period 3; See also Fig. 2A), and sequentially causes the multiple second light-emitting elements included in the multiple second drive circuits in a row in which the writing is completed to emit light (See Fig. 1A, Second field, light emitting period 4; See also Fig. 2A). Before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Choi with the teachings of Lee wherein the first light-emitting element is PWM driven such that luminance is controlled by changing a current flow time while keeping an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element constant, or the first light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element; the second light-emitting element is current driven such that luminance is controlled by changing an amount of current flowing through a light-emitting element, the display panel includes multiple second drive circuits each including the second light-emitting element, and the control unit sequentially performs writing of data to the multiple second drive circuits based on the input image data for the n rows, row by row, and sequentially causes the multiple second light-emitting elements included in the multiple second drive circuits in a row in which the writing is completed to emit light, as suggested by Lee thereby similarly using known configurations for driving first and second light emitting elements on a display device of Choi. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Pub. 2006/0103611 A1 to Choi in view of JP 2000-250456 to Nagatsu. As to claim 10, Choi fails to disclose comprising: a memory, wherein the control unit, during a period in which the write period and the light emission period are combined, performs writing of the input image data to the memory once, and performs reading of the input image data from the memory twice. Nagatsu discloses comprising: a memory, wherein the control unit, during a period in which the write period and the light emission period are combined, performs writing of the input image data to the memory once, and performs reading of the input image data from the memory twice (¶ 0014). Before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Choi with the teachings of Nagatus of comprising: a memory, wherein the control unit, during a period in which the write period and the light emission period are combined, performs writing of the input image data to the memory once, and performs reading of the input image data from the memory twice, as suggested by Nagatsu thereby similarly using known configurations comprising a memory for driving the operation of a display. Claim(s) 13-14, 18-19 and 22-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Pub. 2006/0103611 A1 to Choi in view of US Patent Pub. 2014/0035974 A1 to Jinta et al (“Jinta”). As to claim 13, Choi fails to disclose wherein the display unit is one pixel configured to emit multiple colors, the first light-emitting element emits a first color, and the second light-emitting element emits a color different from the first color. Jinta discloses wherein the display unit is one pixel configured to emit multiple colors (¶ 0049), the first light-emitting element emits a first color (Fig. 11A, shaded pixels 11), and the second light-emitting element emits a color different from the first color (Fig. 11A, unshaded pixels 11). Before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Choi with the teachings of Jinta wherein the display unit is one pixel configured to emit multiple colors, the first light-emitting element emits a first color, and the second light-emitting element emits a color different from the first color, as suggested by Jinta thereby similarly using known configurations for arranging and driving the operation of pixels in a display device. As to claim 14, Choi fails to disclose wherein the display unit is a subpixel configured to emit a first color, and the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element each emit the first color. Jinta discloses wherein the display unit is a subpixel configured to emit a first color, and the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element each emit the first color (¶ 0049). Before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Choi with the teachings of Jinta wherein the display unit is a subpixel configured to emit a first color, and the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element each emit the first color, as suggested by Jinta thereby similarly using known configurations such that OLEDs are driven to emit a specified color. As to claim 18, Jinta discloses wherein the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements are alternately arranged in both a first direction being a vertical direction of the substrate and a second direction being a horizontal direction of the substrate, and each of the multiple display units includes the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element adjacent to each other in the second direction (See Fig. 11A-B; In Fig. 11A, The shaded pixels (first light emitting elements) perform display and the unshaded pixels (second light emitting elements) are not driven. Subsequently, the shaded pixels from Fig. 11A are not driven and the unshaded pixels from Fig. 11A perform display as depicted in Fig. 11B. The shaded pixels 11 driven in Fig. 11A are alternately arranged vertically and horizontally and adjacent to the unshaded pixels 11.). As to claim 19, Jinta discloses wherein the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements are alternately arranged in both a first direction being a vertical direction of the substrate and a second direction being a horizontal direction of the substrate, and each of the multiple display units includes the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element adjacent to each other in the first direction (See Fig. 11A-B; In Fig. 11A, The shaded pixels (first light emitting elements) perform display and the unshaded pixels (second light emitting elements) are not driven. Subsequently, the shaded pixels from Fig. 11A are not driven and the unshaded pixels from Fig. 11A perform display as depicted in Fig. 11B. The shaded pixels 11 driven in Fig. 11A are alternately arranged vertically and horizontally and adjacent to the unshaded pixels 11.). As to claim 22, Jinta discloses a display device comprising: the control device according to claim 13 (See the rejection of claim 13); and the display panel (Fig. 1, 10), wherein the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element do not overlap in a plan view (See Fig. 11A-B; The shaded pixels 11 (first light emitting element) do not overlap unshaded pixels (second light emitting element).), each of the multiple display units includes multiple first light-emitting elements and multiple second light-emitting elements, light-emitting elements out of the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements included in each of the multiple display units are green light-emitting elements, some of the other light-emitting elements out of the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements included in each of the multiple display units are red light-emitting elements, and the remainder of the other light-emitting elements out of the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements included in each of the multiple display units are a blue light-emitting elements (See Fig. 11A-B; In Fig. 11A, The shaded pixels (first light emitting elements) perform display and the unshaded pixels (second light emitting elements) are not driven. Subsequently, the shaded pixels from Fig. 11A are not driven and the unshaded pixels from Fig. 11A perform display as depicted in Fig. 11B. As depicted, the arrangement of the shaded and unshaded pixels are red R, green G, and blue B light emitting elements.). As to claim 23, Jinta discloses a display device comprising: the control device according to claim 13 (See the rejection of claim 13); and the display panel (Fig. 1, 10), wherein the display panel includes a substrate, the first light-emitting element and the second light-emitting element do not overlap in a plan view (See Fig. 11A-B; The shaded pixels 11 (first light emitting element) do not overlap unshaded pixels (second light emitting element).), the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements are alternately arranged in both a first direction being a vertical direction of the substrate and a second direction being a horizontal direction of the substrate (See Fig. 11A-B; In Fig. 11A, The shaded pixels (first light emitting elements) perform display and the unshaded pixels (second light emitting elements) are not driven. Subsequently, the shaded pixels from Fig. 11A are not driven and the unshaded pixels from Fig. 11A perform display as depicted in Fig. 11B. The shaded pixels 11 driven in Fig. 11A are alternately arranged vertically and horizontally and adjacent to the unshaded pixels 11.), each of the multiple display units includes multiple first light-emitting elements and multiple second light-emitting elements, light-emitting elements out of the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements included in each of the multiple display units are a first red light-emitting element, a first green light-emitting element, and a first blue light-emitting element, and the other light-emitting elements out of the multiple first light-emitting elements and the multiple second light-emitting elements included in each of the multiple display units are a second red light-emitting element, a second green light-emitting element, and a second blue light-emitting element (See Fig. 11A-B; As depicted, the arrangement of the shaded and unshaded pixels are red R, green G, and blue B light emitting elements.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS J LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-7354. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS J LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 04, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638948
MOBILE TERMINAL, IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE AND USER INTERFACE PROVISION METHOD USING THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640080
MICRO DISPLAY CONTROLLING SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633237
Video Display Panel Mounting and Aligning System and Method
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625549
DISPLAY CONTROLLING APPARATUS, DISPLAY CONTROLLING METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620149
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OUTPUTTING VIRTUAL SMOKE IMAGE
1y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 960 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month