Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/115,600

VEHICLE BODY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Priority
Oct 06, 2022 — GB 2214711.0 +1 more
Examiner
WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mmd Group Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1060 granted / 1318 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1350
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1318 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 – 18 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 – 12 each positively recite “A body.” Each component/limitation should only be positively recited once. Additionally, claims 1 and 13 each recite “a material conveying vehicle” twice, and claims 13 and 14 each “a chassis.” Appropriate correction is required. Claims 1 and 12 – 13 include limitations using the word “may.” This renders the claims indefinite, as it is unclear if the limitation is required or optional for functionality. Additionally, claims 9 and 15 include limitations using “optionally,” which suffer from the same deficiency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 recites a coating of “other materials.” This renders the claims indefinite, as it is impossible to ascertain the metes and bounds of the limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the bars or rods" in lines 2 and 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Li (CN218112660) discloses a material conveying vehicle similar to the instant invention; however Li, either alone or in combination, neither discloses nor suggests a material conveying vehicle wherein the inner base comprises a rigid apertured network structure having a raised profile that projects away from the outer base, and the inner side walls comprise apertured network structures spaced from the outer sidewalls, thereby defining an intermediate volume into which material smaller than the apertures in the said network structures may pass in use, wherein the intermediate volume is provided with an outlet system from which material therein may be removed. These limitations, in combination with each and every other independent claim limitation, are not shown in the currently cited prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Nordhus (4,915,826) discloses a grain cleaner; Rogers (9,797,112) discloses a mobile weed-sifting apparatus; Lyles et al. (9,889,784) disclose a hauling device; Eberts et al. (10,300,508) disclose a trommel screen with different sized apertures; Li (CN218112660) discloses a raw material conveying device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN DANIEL WALTERS whose telephone number is (571)272-8269. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 am - 5 pm (PT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at 303.297.4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN D WALTERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767239
FENDER LINER AND VEHICLE FRONT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759663
ELECTRIC SCOOTER
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759605
VERTICAL-BAR CONNECTION ASSEMBLY FOR COLLAPSIBLE WAGON, AND COLLAPSIBLE WAGON
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759607
AN APPARATUS, A SYSTEM, AND A METHOD FOR FACILITATING MOVEMENT OF AN OBJECT
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752619
ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN AXLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1318 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month