Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mmd Group Limited has 3 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, so the portfolio has limited overlap in both examination personnel and technical assignments.
HAGEMAN, MARK C is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That examiner is the principal point of concentration, making consistency across those responses a practical prosecution priority.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAGEMAN, MARK C | 2 | 73.8% | +16.0% |
| WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL | 1 | 80.4% | +6.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19115600 | VEHICLE BODY | WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18280904 | FEEDER | HAGEMAN, MARK C | 15d overdue |
| 18280893 | FEEDER | HAGEMAN, MARK C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3652 | 2 |
| 3613 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19115600 | VEHICLE BODY | WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL | 3613 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 26, 2025 |
| 18280893 | FEEDER | HAGEMAN, MARK C | 3652 | §103DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 07, 2023 |
| 18280904 | FEEDER | HAGEMAN, MARK C | 3652 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Sep 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMmd Group Limited has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Mark C Hageman has the most, with 2 of Mmd Group Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
