Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/132,607

IMPROVEMENTS IN, OR RELATING TO GRADING APPARATUS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 23, 2025
Priority
Nov 25, 2022 — NE 794951 +3 more
Examiner
BIDWELL, JAMES R
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sienz Group Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1418 granted / 1581 resolved
+37.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§102
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1581 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3, 5-9, 12-16 and 19-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The last lines of claims 1 and 21 which read “the tipping surface is located at or above at least one or a weighing surface and an axis of the roller” is confusing and not understood. Should the “or” be changed to –of--? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 12, 16 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kennedy et al. (US 6,092,640). Kennedy et al. show article carrier 1 having a bracket 10 which attaches to a conveyor, a carrier frame for a roller 2, the carrier frame is pivotally supported by the bracket 10 such that it may pivot relative to the bracket and a tipping surface 3, 4, 5 and weighing surface 33 which are located at or above at least one of the weighing surface or axis of roller 2. Re claim 2, the tipping surface can be considered to at the weighing surface. Re claim 3, the weighing surface 33 is shown on both sides of the tipping surface 4. Re claim 5, the tipping surface 3, 4, 5 extends from near an edge of the roller to an axis of the roller. See Figure 3. Re claim 12, see Figures 3 and 4. Re claim 15, the carrier is biased to a non-tipping position. Re claim 16, see recesses 22 and 23. Re claim 21, the carrier frame is separably pivotally supported by the bracket 10 and a tipping surface contacts an actuator so as to cause tipping. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9, 13, 14, 19, 20 and 22-25 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 106347989 shows an article carrier best shown in Figure 9 which has a pivotable carrier frame supported by a bracket which attaches to a conveyor and a tipping surface which located above an axis of a roller. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES R BIDWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-6910. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8 to 4. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford, can be reached at telephone number (571)272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /JAMES R BIDWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 07/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691470
MATERIAL HANDLING APPARATUS FOR DELIVERING OR RETRIEVING ITEMS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692094
MEDICATION CONTAINER PROBE SORTING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686032
LOGICAL RELOCATION OF SORT DESTINATIONS
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678870
SIDE-MOUNTED DOUBLE-SAW SYNCHRONOUS TRANSMISSION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685078
SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1581 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month