Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sienz Group Limited has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated on this one pending case, which provides a clear and singular focus for its intellectual property strategy. This arrangement minimizes the need to manage multiple examiner relationships or navigate different art unit cultures.
BIDWELL, JAMES R is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. This examiner manages the only active office action for the company. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests a focused technical review for the pending application. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the entire prosecution workload is centralized under this one examiner. This allows the applicant to dedicate all resources to the specific requirements of this single matter within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIDWELL, JAMES R | 1 | 89.7% | +8.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19132607 | IMPROVEMENTS IN, OR RELATING TO GRADING APPARATUS AND METHODS | BIDWELL, JAMES R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19132607 | IMPROVEMENTS IN, OR RELATING TO GRADING APPARATUS AND METHODS | BIDWELL, JAMES R | 3651 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 23, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial