Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/163,481

Piston and Internal Combustion Engine

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Priority
Mar 15, 2023 — DE 10 2023 106 531.9 +1 more
Examiner
HOLBROOK, TEUTA BAJRAMOVIC
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ks Kolbenschmidt GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
464 granted / 643 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
675
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 643 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claims 1 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1 and 15 recites values that were not assigned any units. Claims 1 and 15 should recite 2.9674 mm2, 220.68 mm3, 4.1893 mm2 and 311.55 mm3. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 15 recite: “a piston diameter measured on the piston skirt”. It is unclear what the applicant is claiming. The applicant has not properly defined what is ascertained as the diameter. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 9-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Grover, Jr. et al. (US 2012/0255520 A1), hereafter Grover. Regarding claims 1, 10 and 15, Grover discloses a piston (320) for use in a hydrogen-powered internal combustion engine [0026], comprising: a piston head (shown in Fig. 3) comprising: a center axis (inherent); a fire bridge having an upper surface positioned on a plane oriented perpendicular to the center axis (Fig. 3); and a combustion bowl (322) defined by the plane and an edge-free combustion bowl surface extending radially outward from the center axis to the fire bridge at the upper surface; and a piston skirt (shown in Fig. 3) connected to the piston head, the piston having a piston diameter (inherent). Grover further discloses: “The geometry of the dish-shaped depression and the depression volume that results can be based upon the desired compression ratio.” Paragraph [0034]. “Based upon a desired compression ratio and a known geometry of the rest of the combustion chamber, specifically the geometry of the cylinder head, a desired depression volume or a desired total combustion chamber volume can be determined.” Paragraph [0036]. Grover is silent to the combustion bowl having a combustion bowl volume configured to have between a minimum combustion bowl volume which is 2.9674 mm2 times the piston diameter minus a value of 220.68 mm3, and a maximum combustion bowl volume which is 4.1893 mm2 times the piston diameter minus a value of 311.55mm3. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make an engine piston with a combustion bowl having the specifications as claimed, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claims 2, 3 and 18, Grover further discloses a piston wherein the piston head defines a valve pocket (340) positioned in the fire bridge and extending downward from the plane and parallel to the center axis, the valve pocket having a valve pocket volume, wherein the valve pocket volume is included in the minimum combustion bowl volume and the maximum combustion bowl volume (shown in Fig. 3). Regarding claims 4, 5, 9, 11, 16 and 17, Grover further discloses a piston wherein the edge-free combustion bowl surface comprises: a central section; a first wall section merging with the central section at a first rounded edge; and a second wall section merging with the first wall section at a second rounded edge and merging with the fire bridge at a third rounded edge (Fig. 3-Fig. 5 depict embodiments each comprising a central section; a first wall section merging with the central section at a first rounded edge; and a second wall section merging with the first wall section at a second rounded edge and merging with the fire bridge at a third rounded edge), wherein the at least one valve pocket is ring-segment-shaped, and the at least one valve pocket extends through the fire bridge viewed along a radial direction of the piston (Fig. 3). Grover is silent to the rounded edges comprising a radius greater than 1 mm, or greater than 5mm. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide rounded edges with a radius greater than 1mm or greater than 5mm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claims 6, 12 and 19, Grover is silent to a piston wherein the piston has a ratio of a compression height to the piston diameter of 0.4 to 0.65. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a piston with a ratio of a compression height to the piston diameter of 0.4 to 0.65 since the applicant has not disclosed why the particular ratio is of importance and it appears that the piston of Grover would meet the desired outcome. In addition, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a piston with a ratio of a compression height to the piston diameter of 0.4 to 0.65, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Claim(s) 7, 8, 13 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Grover, Jr. et al. (US 2012/0255520 A1), in view of Kim et al. (US 2018/0100465 A1), hereafter Kim. Regarding claims 7, 8, 13 and 14, Grover discloses an edge-free combustion bowl surface (Fig. 3 – Fig. 5), however Grover is silent to the piston head having a cooling channel that extends completely around a center axis of the piston, and wherein the combustion bowl extends into the piston head along the piston axis at least a level of the cooling channel. Kim discloses a hydrogen-powered vehicle having a piston comprising a cooling channel that extends completely around a center axis of the piston, and wherein the combustion bowl extends into the piston head along the piston axis at least a level of the cooling channel (Fig. 4). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the cooling channel of Kim in the piston of Grover in order to provide cooling of the piston. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEUTA B HOLBROOK whose telephone number is (571)270-3276. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8am-4:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LINDSAY LOW can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TEUTA HOLBROOK/ Examiner Art Unit 3747 /GEORGE C JIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12710003
BLOW-BY GAS PROCESSING APPARATUS, INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE, AND SUPERCHARGER
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704104
FUEL PRESSURE ACCUMULATING DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704087
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DIAGNOSING THERMOSTAT FAULT OF ENGINE COOLING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12674431
ENGINE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662976
PROFILED COVER PLATE FOR A PISTON
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.6%)
2y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 643 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month