Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/169,332

PIXEL, DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Priority
Jun 26, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0083441 +1 more
Examiner
LUBIT, RYAN A
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
484 granted / 765 resolved
+1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Application 1. Claims 1 – 20 are pending and are under examination in this action. 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification 3. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: in paragraphs [0014] and [0023], the “high power voltage having a relatively low power voltage level” language should be amended to state “high power voltage having a relatively high power voltage level”. Appropriate correction is required in order to be consistent with the disclosure in paragraphs [0018], [0056], and [0094]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 5. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 8, 13, 17, and 20, the terms “relatively” are relative terms which render the claims indefinite. The term “relatively”, with regard to both “low power voltage level” and “high power voltage level”, are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. It is recommended that Applicant remove the term “relatively” from the claims. Regarding claims 8 and 17, the recitation of “a high power voltage having a relatively low power voltage level” lacks proper antecedent basis, is self-contradictory, and is also inconsistent with the specification as originally filed. First, the recitation of “a relatively low power voltage level” is previously recited in parent claims 1 and 13, respectively. Second, it is unclear how a “high power voltage” can be a relatively “low power voltage”. This is self-contradictory. Third, the body of the specification clearly identifies the low power voltage as ELVSS and the high power voltage as ELVDD. It is unclear how ELVDD can have a “relatively low power” when it is in fact a high power voltage. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 1 – 20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action. Pertinent Prior Art 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon which is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure includes: Lim et al. (U.S. Pub. 2016/0042694), Liu et al. (U.S. Pub. 2023/0206834), Xu (U.S. Pub. 2019/03362674), Charisoulis et al. (U.S. Pub. 2025/0292722), Kim et al. (U.S. Pub. 2021/0049958), In et al. (U.S. Pub. 2017/0140697), Huang (U.S. Patent 11,978,393), Okabe et al. (U.S. Pub. 2021/0343238), and Park et al. (U.S. Pub.2023/0010212). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN A LUBIT whose telephone number is (571)270-3389. The examiner can normally be reached M - F, ~6am - 3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN A LUBIT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 03, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681312
RING-MOUNTED FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT REMOTE CONTROL
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669970
IMAGE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM AND IMAGE TRANSMISSION APPARATUS
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663644
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RELATIVE REPRESENTATION OF SPATIAL OBJECTS AND DISAMBIGUATION IN AN INTERFACE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656900
SMART WATCH
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650732
MEDIA CONTENT ITEMS WITH HAPTIC FEEDBACK AUGMENTATIONS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.2%)
2y 9m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month