Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/169,693

SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL INCLUDING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 03, 2025
Examiner
ALMEIDA, CORY A
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
528 granted / 790 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
812
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 790 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims The filing dated 4/3/25 is entered. Claims 1-20 are pending. Foreign Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statements The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/23/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5, 7-11, 13, and 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Song, US-20240114762. In regards to claim 1, Song discloses a substrate (Fig. 3, substrate) comprising: a first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer); an adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer) on the first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer), the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer) comprising at least one trench (Fig. 3, 10 concave structure); a second base layer (Fig. 3, 28 buffer layer + 49 dielectric layer) on the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer); and a barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) overlapping with the at least one trench (Fig. 3, 10 concave structure), wherein the at least one trench (Fig. 3, 10 concave structure) penetrates the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer). In regards to claim 8, Song discloses display panel (Par. 000 1 “flexible display panel”) comprising: a ground layer (Fig. 3, 23 flexible substrate); a first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer) on the ground layer (Fig. 3, 23 flexible substrate); an adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer) on the first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 ); a second base layer (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) (Fig. 3, 28 buffer layer + 49 dielectric layer) on the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer); and a barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) in contact with one surface of the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer), and connected to the ground layer (Fig. 3, 23 flexible substrate). In regards to claim 13, Song discloses electronic device (Par. 000 1 “flexible display device”) comprising: a processor to provide input image data (Par. 0070 discloses flexible display devices which all have processors used to display image data); and a display device to display an image based on the input image data (Par. 0070 discloses flexible display devices which all have processors used to display image data), a display device (Par. 000 1 “flexible display device”) comprising: a ground layer (Fig. 3, 23 flexible substrate); a first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer);an adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer) on the first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer), and comprising at least one trench (Fig. 3, 10 concave structure); a second base layer (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) (Fig. 3, 28 buffer layer + 49 dielectric layer) on the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer); and a barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) overlapping with the at least one trench (Fig. 3, 10 concave structure), and penetrating the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer). In regards to claim 3, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) is located on an edge area surrounding a central area of the substrate (Fig. 3, 15 organic material is located in a bonding area, i.e. on an edge area surrounding a central area of the substrate). In regards to claim 5, Song discloses the first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer) and the second base layer (Fig. 3, 28 buffer layer + 49 dielectric layer) have a flexibility (Par. 0004 “The flexible TFT substrate can be used in the flexible display panel, so that the flexible display panel can realize a narrow bezel design”, therefore the elements are flexible). In regards to claim 7, Song discloses the adhesive layer (Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer) comprises amorphous silicon (Par. 0057 adhesive layer is silicon oxide, which is amorphous). In regards to claim 9, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) surrounds a display area (Fig. 3, display region), and is located on a non-display area (Fig. 3, bonding region, i.e. non-display region) different from the display area (Fig. 3, 15 organic material is located in a bonding area, i.e. on an edge area surrounding a display area/region). In regards to claim 10, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) is in contact with the first base layer (Fig. 3, 25 barrier layer). In regards to claim 11, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) is in contact with the second base layer (Fig. 3, 28 buffer layer + 49 dielectric layer). In regards to claim 16, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) surrounds a display area (Fig. 3, display region), and is located on a non-display area (Fig. 3, bonding region, i.e. non-display region) different from the display area (Fig. 3, 15 organic material is located in a bonding area, i.e. on an edge area surrounding a display area/region). In regards to claim 17, Song discloses the barrier (Fig. 3, 15 organic material) is connected to the ground layer (Fig. 3, 23 flexible substrate) through a connection line (Fig. 3, 19 connecting element). In regards to claim 18, Song discloses the connection line (Fig. 3, 19 connecting element) overlaps with the non-display area (Fig. 3, bonding region, i.e. non-display region). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song, US-20240114762, in view of Wang, US-20190005856. In regards to claim 3, Song does not disclose expressly the central area comprises: a first side; a second side opposite to the first side; a third side connected to the first side and the second side; and a fourth side opposite to the third side, and wherein the barrier comprises: a first barrier adjacent to a corner between the first side and the fourth side; a second barrier adjacent to a corner between the second side and the third side; and a third barrier adjacent to a corner between the first side and the third side. Wang discloses expressly the central area comprises: a first side (Fig. 1 left side); a second side opposite to the first side (Fig. 1 right side); a third side connected to the first side and the second side (Fig. 1 top side); and a fourth side opposite to the third side (Fig. 1 bottom side), and wherein the barrier (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region) comprises: a first barrier (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region) adjacent to a corner between the first side and the fourth side (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region); a second barrier (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region) adjacent to a corner between the second side and the third side (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region); and a third barrier (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region) adjacent to a corner between the first side and the third side (Fig. 1, 13 bonding region surrounding 11 pixel region; Fig. 3, 352 through hole, i.e. barrier, in bonding region which surrounds the pixel region). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the bonding region of Song can surround the display region in the manner of Wang thereby providing the organic material barrier surrounding the display region. The motivation for doing so would have been to improve bending resistance (Song Par. 0004-0005) around the display region. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song, US-20240114762, in view of Bright, US-20020022156. In regards to claim 4, Song does not disclose expressly the barrier comprises a dielectric material. Bright discloses the barrier comprises a dielectric material (Par. 0011 organic dielectric barrier). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the organic material of Song can be an organic dielectric barrier as Bright discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide barrier and conductive properties (Bright Par. 0017). Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song, US-20240114762, in view of Zhu, US-20200295115, and in further view of Gu, US-20130208017. In regards to claim 6, Song does not disclose expressly the first base layer and the second base layer comprise polyimide. Zhu discloses the first base layer comprises a polyimide (Par. 0051 a polyimide can be used as a buffer layer). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the buffer layer of Song can be a polyimide as Gu discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide polyimide as a buffer which is useful in flexible substrates (Zhu Par. 0080). Gu discloses the second base layer comprises a polyimide (Par. 0011 organic dielectric barrier) Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the barrier layer of Song can be a polyimide as Zhu discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide polyimide as a barrier which is useful in flexible substrates (Zhu Par. 0080). Claim(s) 12, 14, 15, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song, US-20240114762, in view of Kim, US-20210134931. In regards to claim 12, Song does not disclose expressly the ground layer has a ground potential. Kim discloses the ground layer has a ground potential (Par. 0373 a flexible display having a polyimide substrate connected to a connection member through a contact hole to connect to ground). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the flexible substrate of Song can be made of polyimide and connected to ground as Kim discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to remove charges (Kim Par. 0373). In regards to claim 14, Song does not disclose expressly the ground layer has a ground potential. Kim discloses the ground layer has a ground potential (Par. 0373 a flexible display having a polyimide substrate connected to a connection member through a contact hole to connect to ground). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the flexible substrate of Song can be made of polyimide and connected to ground as Kim discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to remove charges (Kim Par. 0373). In regards to claim 15, Song and Kim, as combined above, disclose the barrier (Kim Fig. 3, 15 organic material) has an electrical conductivity higher than an electrical conductivity of the adhesive layer (Kim Fig. 3, 26 adhesive layer is silicone oxide and has a high dielectric strength as such the conductivity of the organic material would be higher). In regards to claim 19, Song discloses a display panel configured to display an image through the display area (Par. 0001 flexible display panel; Fig. 3, display region). Song does not disclose expressly a data driver configured to supply a data signal to the display panel, and located at one side of the display panel, wherein the barrier is not located at the one side of the display panel. Kim discloses a data driver (Fig. 1, 153 data driver) configured to supply a data signal to the display panel (Par. 0048 supplying data signal to the display panel), and located at one side of the display panel (Fig. 1, 153 data driver), wherein the barrier is not located at the one side of the display panel (Fig. 3, 155 pads supplying data signals located at one side of the display in an area where connection line 126 and associated contact hole shown in Fig. 5 is not present). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the organic material, i.e. barrier, of Song can be present on the sides of the display that do not have the data driver as Kim discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to allow space for the data driver and signal lines. In regards to claim 20, Song does not disclose expressly a bias supplier configured to supply a bias voltage to the barrier, wherein the bias voltage has a low level voltage during a period. Kim discloses a bias supplier configured to supply a bias voltage to the barrier, wherein the bias voltage has a low level voltage during a period (Par. 0373 a flexible display having a polyimide substrate connected to a connection member through a contact hole to connect to ground, i.e. connection to ground is supplying a bias voltage during a period). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the flexible substrate of Song can be made of polyimide and connected to ground as Kim discloses. The motivation for doing so would have been to remove charges (Kim Par. 0373). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CORY A ALMEIDA whose telephone number is (571)270-3143. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-730PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nitin (Kumar) Patel can be reached at (571) 272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CORY A ALMEIDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628 1/6/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601922
WAVEGUIDES WITH ENHANCED MODAL DENSITIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591406
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING INTERACTIVE MEDIA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586521
DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586522
Correction Method Of Display Apparatus And Correction System Of The Display Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586492
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD PROVIDING 3-DIMENSION IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+22.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 790 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month