Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 24, 2026
Application No. 19/189,250

VARIABLE OUTPUT IMPEDANCE RF GENERATOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 24, 2025
Priority
Nov 30, 2018 — provisional 62/774,078 +4 more
Examiner
SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Eagle Harbor Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
744 granted / 837 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
856
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 837 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Non-Final Rejection Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting Claims 1- 10 (??) of this application is patentably indistinct from claims 1- of Application No. 19/189,229. Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(f), when two or more applications filed by the same applicant or assignee contain patentably indistinct claims, elimination of such claims from all but one application may be required in the absence of good and sufficient reason for their retention during pendency in more than one application. Applicant is required to either cancel the patentably indistinct claims from all but one application or maintain a clear line of demarcation between the applications. See MPEP § 822. Claim Objections The numbering of claims is not in accordance with 37 CFR 1.126 which requires the original numbering of the claims to be preserved throughout the prosecution. When claims are canceled, the remaining claims must not be renumbered. When new claims are presented, they must be numbered consecutively beginning with the number next following the highest numbered claims previously presented (whether entered or not). Example: Misnumbered claim 2 has been renumbered as claim 1 (actually it is depending claim 1). Similarly several other independent claims and dependent claims are wrongly numbered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 (??) rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Referring to claims 1-10 (??) Examiner is not clear on how to read the claims as the independent claims and dependent claims are messed up with repetition of numbers. Hence it is difficult to determine the scope of the claims as independent claims and dependent claims should follow a continuity according to MPEP. Hence, examiner suggests to applicant to amend the claim numbers properly according to MPEP. Conclusion Claims 1-10 (??) are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SRINIVAS SATHIRAJU whose telephone number is (571)272-4250. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM-3:30PM, 5PM -8:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALEXANDER H TANINGCO can be reached at 5712728048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SRINIVAS SATHIRAJU/06/16/2026 SRINIVAS . SATHIRAJU Primary Examiner Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738385
MAGNETIC MIRROR MACHINE
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738466
SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM AND POWER SUPPLY DEVICE HAVING A SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738455
RF POWER SPLITTING AND CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738454
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731766
SUBSTRATE SUPPORT INCLUDING MULTIPLE RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) ELECTRODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 0m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 837 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month