Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/196,563

DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 01, 2025
Priority
Jul 19, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0095868
Examiner
BOYD, JONATHAN A
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
494 granted / 716 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
78.1%
+38.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 716 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTIONNotice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9-11, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KIM et al (2023/0057700) (herein “KIM”). In regards to claim 1, 11 and 20, KIM teaches a display device comprising: a display panel comprising a pixel configured to receive a driving voltage through a driving voltage line (See; Figs. 1-3 for display panel 110 having subpixels SP and driving voltage line DVL); a panel driver configured to drive the display panel (See; Figs. 1 and 2); a voltage generator configured to generate the driving voltage, and determine a voltage level of the driving voltage based on a voltage control signal (See; Fig. 1 for power management circuit 150 supplying a driving voltage); a driving controller configured to control a driving of the panel driver, and supply the voltage control signal to the voltage generator (See; Fig. 1 for timing controller 140); and a voltage detector between the voltage generator and the driving voltage line, and configured to sense a sensing voltage corresponding to a current flowing into the driving voltage line, and output a sensing signal based on the sensing voltage (See; Fig. 5 and p[0113]-p[0116] for current detecting circuit 310 having resistor 312 for sensing a current and outputting a signal based on the sensed value), wherein the driving controller is configured to: receive the sensing signal from the voltage detector; and generate the voltage control signal based on the sensing signal (See; Fig. 5 and p[0114]-p[0118] where timing controller 140 receives the sensed value from the current detecting circuit 310 and generates a control signal BDP based on the sensing signal). Claim 11 is a broader recitation of claim 1, however the rejection above covers all aspects of claim 11. Claim 20 reads on everything in the rejection of claim 1, including a main processor configured to provide an image signal to the driving controller (See; Fig. 1 for host system 200). In regards to claim 9, KIM teaches wherein the driving voltage line comprises a first driving voltage line and a second driving voltage line, and wherein the pixel comprises: a driving transistor connected to the first driving voltage line configured to receive a first driving voltage (See; Fig. 5 for DRT connected to DVL / EVDD); and a light emitting element connected between the driving transistor and the second driving voltage line configured to receive a second driving voltage (See; Fig. 5 for ED connected to EVSS). In regards to claim 10, KIM teaches wherein the voltage detector is connected between the voltage generator and the second driving voltage line as the driving voltage line (See; Fig. 5 for detector 310). In regards to claim 19, KIM teaches wherein the driving voltage line comprises a first driving voltage line and a second driving voltage line, and wherein the pixel comprises: a driving transistor connected to the first driving voltage line configured to receive a first driving voltage (See; Fig. 5 for DRT connected to DVL / EVDD); and a light emitting element connected between the driving transistor and the second driving voltage line configured to receive a second driving voltage (See; Fig. 5 for ED connected to EVSS), wherein the driving voltage is one of the first driving voltage or the second driving voltage, and wherein the voltage controller is connected between the voltage generator and the second driving voltage line (See; Figs. 1 and 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 and 12-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN A BOYD whose telephone number is (571)270-7503. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at (571) 272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN A BOYD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682639
METHOD FOR DETECTING URINE FORMED ELEMENTS BASED ON DEEP LEARNING AND CONTEXT RELATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682848
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669877
DEVICE DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663885
METHOD FOR PROVIDING INPUT EVENT TO VIRTUAL OBJECT, HOST, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663880
VIRTUAL REALITY CONTROL DEVICE AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 716 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month