Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/197,150

DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 02, 2025
Examiner
PERVAN, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
736 granted / 912 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
927
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 912 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim et al (US 2023/0189567; provided by Applicant). In regards to claims 1 and 20, Kim discloses an electronic device (paragraph 50; products): a housing (it is inherent that the products which have the display panel would have a housing); a display device (display device 1) which is accommodated in the housing and displays an image (Fig. 1 and paragraph 50), the display device including: a light-emitting element (OLED) (Fig. 4 and paragraph 69); a first transistor (transistor T1) which generates a driving current applied to the light-emitting element (Fig, 4 and paragraphs 71, 75-77), the first transistor including: a first channel area (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 137-138; CH1 of ACT1); a second transistor (transistor T2) which applies a data voltage to the first transistor in response to a first gate signal (Fig. 4 and paragraphs 72 78), the second transistor including: a second channel area (CH2 of ACT2) disposed in a different layer from the first channel area (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 112-113); a third transistor (transistor T5) which applies a power voltage to the first transistor in response to a second gate signal (Fig. 4 and paragraphs 72, 82), the third transistor including: a third channel area (CH5 of ACT5) disposed in a different layer from each of the first channel area and the second channel area (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 164-165); and a fourth transistor (transistor T6) which electrically connects the first transistor and the light-emitting element in response to a light-emitting signal (Fig. 4 and paragraphs 72, 75, 83), the fourth transistor including: a fourth channel area (CH6 of ACT6) disposed in a different layer from each of the first channel area and the second channel area (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 164-165). In regards to claim 2, Kim discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the first channel area (CH1 of ACT1) is disposed in a first semiconductor layer (SC2) (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 137-138), and the second channel area (CH2 of ACT2) is disposed in a second semiconductor layer (SC1) on which the first semiconductor layer is disposed (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 112-113). In regards to claim 3, Kim discloses the display device of claim 2, wherein the third channel area (CH5 of ACT5) and the fourth channel area (CH6 of ACT6) are disposed in a third semiconductor layer (SC3) disposed on the first semiconductor layer (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 164-166)). In regards to claim 4, Kim discloses the display device of claim 3, wherein the first semiconductor layer (SC2) is disposed between the second semiconductor layer (SC1) and the third semiconductor layer (SC3) (Fig. 5 and paragraphs 137-138). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Park et al (US 2023/0157088) discloses a display device and method of fabricating the same. The display device comprises a substrate, a first semiconductor layer, a first gate insulating layer, a first gate electrode dispose, a first interlayer insulating layer, a first oxide semiconductor layer, a second gate insulating layer and a second gate electrode sequentially disposed on the substrate, spacers disposed on side surfaces of the second gate electrode, and a second interlayer insulating layer disposed on the spacers, wherein each of the spacers comprises a first spacer disposed to contact a side surface of the second gate electrode and a second spacer disposed on the first spacer. A concentration of hydrogen included in the first spacer is lower than a concentration of hydrogen included in the second spacer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Pervan whose telephone number is (571)272-0910. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri between 7:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached at (571) 272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL PERVAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629 March 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596450
Method of controlling touch sensor and related touch sensing circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588852
NEURAL INTERFACE SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578769
HOUSING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566521
TOUCH PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION PATTERN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554342
TOUCH PAD AND COMPUTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 912 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month