Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/208,106

CEMENTING STAGE TOOL AND ASSOCIATED METHODS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 14, 2025
Priority
Jan 10, 2024 — provisional 63/619,507 +1 more
Examiner
FULLER, ROBERT EDWARD
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Weatherford Technology Holdings LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 852 resolved
+27.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.1%
+29.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed April 23, 2026, have been fully considered. Applicant has argued that Anton fails to teach a closing sleeve as claimed in amended claim 1. Examiner agrees, and has withdrawn the rejection based on the Anton reference. However, the amended claims now stand rejected based on a new reference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Stepp et al. (US 5,109,925, hereinafter Stepp). With regard to claim 1, Stepp discloses a cementing stage tool for use with a subterranean well, the cementing stage tool comprising: a flow passage (12) extending longitudinally through the cementing stage tool; an outer housing assembly (14+18+102) including a housing port (122) extending through a sidewall of the outer housing assembly; an opening sleeve (76) releasably secured against axial displacement in the outer housing assembly (via shear pin 78), the opening sleeve configured to prevent fluid flow between the flow passage and the housing port in a run-in configuration of the cementing stage tool (“packer 10 is in the configuration shown in Figs. 1A and 1B when run into the well bore”—note that in Fig. 1A, opening sleeve 76 blocks port 122); a rupture disk (126) configured to prevent fluid flow between the flow passage and the housing port, in which the rupture disk is configured to permit fluid flow between the flow passage and the housing port in response to a predetermined pressure differential applied from the flow passage to the housing port (“when the pressure in the casing, and thus in central opening 12 of packer 10, reaches a predetermined level, rupture disc 126 will rupture outwardly”), and a closing sleeve (34) configured to prevent fluid flow between the flow passage and the housing port in a closed configuration of the cementing stage tool (“When closing sleeve 34 is thus moved, lower seals 40 are moved below port 30 in case 18. Upper seals 38 are still above port 30, and upper seals 38 are sealingly engaged with third bore 26 in case 18. Port 30 thus is sealingly closed by closing sleeve 34.”). With regard to claim 6, Stepp teaches that the opening sleeve includes a seat (90) configured for engagement with an opening plug (“opening plug 166 engages chamfer 90 in opening sleeve 76”), the opening sleeve being configured to displace to an open position in which fluid flow between the flow passage and the housing port is permitted in response to a predetermined pressure differential applied across the opening plug (“Pressure is then applied in the casing which forces opening plug 166 against opening sleeve 76, thereby shearing shear pin 78 and moving opening sleeve 76 downwardly until lower end 96 thereof contacts upper end 58 of seat retainer 54…port 42 in closing sleeve 34 is thus opened and placed in communication with central opening 12 in packer 10.”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E FULLER whose telephone number is (571)272-6300. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM - 5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at 571-270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT E FULLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680388
HANDHELD AUGERS OPERABLE IN A NORMAL MODE AND A BREAKER MODE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679250
SEAT CROSS MEMBER ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679265
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR VIBRATION DAMPED CUP-HOLDER
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12654576
CHARGE PORT COVER FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644370
RIG STATE DETECTION USING VIDEO DATA
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+2.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month