Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/212,654

FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 19, 2025
Examiner
HONG, RICHARD J
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
459 granted / 589 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
624
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 589 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 1 is pending. Title The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL HAVING FLEXIBLE ENCAPSULATION MEMBER AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). Present Application Pat. No. 12,306,670 1. A display apparatus comprising: a flexible substrate; a display region comprising a light-emitting device and disposed on the flexible substrate; a first non-display region bent with respect to the display region; a second non-display region bent with respect to the display region, the second non-display region facing the first non-display region; a third non-display region comprising a first portion being bent with respect to the display region and a second portion being bent with respect to the first portion, the third non-display region being disposed between the first non-display region and the second non-display region; a fourth non-display region disposed on an opposite side of the display region from the third non-display region, an area of the third non-display region being larger than an area of the fourth non-display region; a flexible encapsulation member disposed on the display region and the first to fourth non-display regions; a touch region disposed on the flexible encapsulation member; and touch wirings disposed outside the touch region and on the first non-display region, the second non-display region, and the third non-display region. 1. A display apparatus comprising: a flexible substrate; a display region comprising a light-emitting device and disposed on the flexible substrate; a first non-display region bent with respect to the display region; a second non-display region bent with respect to the display region, the second non-display region facing the first non-display region; a third non-display region comprising a first portion being bent with respect to the display region and a second portion being bent with respect to the first portion, the third non-display region being disposed between the first non-display region and the second non-display region; a fourth non-display region disposed on an opposite side of the display region from the third non-display region, an area of the third non-display region being larger than an area of the fourth non-display region; a flexible encapsulation member disposed on the display region and the first to fourth non-display regions; a touch region disposed on the flexible encapsulation member; and touch wirings disposed outside the touch region and on the first non-display region, the second non-display region, and the third non-display region. A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper time-wise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a non-statutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based e-Terminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An e-Terminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about e-Terminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of Patent No. 11,803,210, Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because: Present Application Pat. No. 11,803,210 1. A display apparatus comprising: a flexible substrate; a display region comprising a light-emitting device and disposed on the flexible substrate; a first non-display region bent with respect to the display region; a second non-display region bent with respect to the display region, the second non-display region facing the first non-display region; a third non-display region comprising a first portion being bent with respect to the display region and a second portion being bent with respect to the first portion, the third non-display region being disposed between the first non-display region and the second non-display region; a fourth non-display region disposed on an opposite side of the display region from the third non-display region, an area of the third non-display region being larger than an area of the fourth non-display region; a flexible encapsulation member disposed on the display region and the first to fourth non-display regions; a touch region disposed on the flexible encapsulation member; and touch wirings disposed outside the touch region and on the first non-display region, the second non-display region, and the third non-display region. 1. A display apparatus comprising: a flexible substrate; a display region comprising a light-emitting device and disposed on the flexible substrate; a first non-display region bent with respect to the display region; a second non-display region bent with respect to the display region, the second non-display region facing the first non-display region; a third non-display region comprising a first portion being bent with respect to the display region and a second portion being bent with respect to the first portion, the third non-display region being disposed between the first non-display region and the second non-display region; a fourth non-display region unbent with respect to the display region, the fourth non-display region being on an opposite side of the display region from third non-display region, an area of the third non-display region being larger than an area of the fourth non-display region; a flexible encapsulation member disposed on the display region and the first to fourth non-display regions; a touch region disposed on the flexible encapsulation member; and touch wirings disposed outside the touch region and on the first non-display region, the second non-display region, and the third non-display region; and a pad unit on the second portion of the third on-display region. It is clear that all the elements of the application claim 1 is to be found in patent claim 1 (as the application claim 1 fully encompasses patent claim 1). The difference between the application claim 1 lies in the fact that the patent claim includes more elements and is thus more specific. Thus, the invention of claim 1 of the patent is in effect a “species” of the “generic” invention of the application claim 1. It has been held that the generic invention is “anticipated” by the “species”. See in re Goodman, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Since application claim 1 is anticipated by claim 1 of the patent, it is not patentably distinct from claims 1-20 of the patent. Conclusion The prior arts made of record and not relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Yamazaki et al. (US 2015/0053959 A1) teach the concept that “the second display region is curved, and the first display region and the second display region are substantially flat” (Abs.); and Hatano et al. (US 2010/0123160 A1) teaches the concept of a bent display region (e.g., FIG. 25). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD J HONG whose telephone number is (571) 270-7765. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LunYi Lao can be reached on (571) 272-7671. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Jan. 23, 2026 /RICHARD J HONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621 ***
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 19, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596398
FLEXIBLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578827
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572215
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING/REDUCING MISRECOGNITION OF GESTURE IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573159
FUTURE POSE PREDICTOR FOR A CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566514
TOUCH STRUCTURE HAVING THROUGH HOLES ON OVERLAPPING PARTS AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month