Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/214,540

POSITION CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 21, 2025
Priority
May 22, 2024 — JP 2024-083372
Examiner
AHMED, MASUD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Okuma Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
987 granted / 1196 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1212
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1196 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 7 recite determining whether a control target is operating at a constant velocity in a "very low velocity region" and further recite "very low constant velocity operation." The term "very low" is a term of degree that renders the scope of the claims unclear because the claims do not provide objective boundaries by which one of ordinary skill in the art could determine, with reasonable certainty, whether a particular velocity falls within the recited "very low velocity region." Although the claims further recite that the velocity is less than or equal to a predefined threshold value, the claims do not specify the value of the threshold, how the threshold is selected, who or what defines the threshold, or any objective criteria for establishing the threshold. As a result, substantially different threshold values could be selected by different practitioners, leading to substantially different scopes of the claimed invention. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the metes and bounds of the claimed "very low velocity region" or "very low constant velocity operation," and therefore the scope of claims 1 and 7 cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. The claims are therefore indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Dependent claims are also rejected based on the dependencies. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MASUD AHMED whose telephone number is (571)270-1315. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-8:30 PM PST with IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abby Lin can be reached at 571 270 3976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MASUD . AHMED Primary Examiner Art Unit 3657A /MASUD AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679405
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668256
TRANSPARENCY AND VALIDATION OF VEHICLE LOCOMOTIVE ACTIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662145
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SAFE CONTROL INPUTS U(K) FOR ACTUATOR COMPONENTS OF A VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656780
LOGISTICS ROBOT FLEET MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND FLEET MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREFOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658062
Skateboard System
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 7m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1196 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month