Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Okuma Corporation

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 2 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Okuma Corporation currently manages 6 pending office actions within its company patent portfolio, focused on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 6 pending actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's mechanical innovations are concentrated in two primary technical groups. This arrangement allows the company to develop specialized strategies for each of the 2 distinct art units involved.

The prosecution workload is handled by 6 distinct examiners, matching the total number of 6 pending office actions. This 1 to 1 ratio ensures that each application is being reviewed by a different individual, providing a wide range of perspectives on the company's mechanical claims. CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG is identified as the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action for the corporation.

The 6 pending office actions represent the current active pipeline for Okuma Corporation in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. With 6 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the prosecution environment is administratively diverse but technically focused. CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, is one of several key figures in the company's ongoing efforts to secure patent protection.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§102 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
4
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG 1 72.8% +26.1%
BUTLER, KEVIN C 1 89.5% +8.8%
YOON, ERIC 1 58.9% +65.9%
GATES, ERIC ANDREW 1 78.8% +14.5%
POLLOCK, AUSTIN M 1 51.3% +36.1%
MENON, KRISHNAN S 1 59.7% +11.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18908899 VIBRATION CHARACTERISTIC ESTIMATION SYSTEM IN MACHINE TOOL, MACHINE TOOL, AND VIBRATION CHARACTERISTIC ESTIMATION METHOD BUTLER, KEVIN C —
18804208 DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE YOON, ERIC —
18644302 JOINED BODY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF POLLOCK, AUSTIN M —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18919637 PLACEMENT IDENTIFYING APPARATUS CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG —
18804208 DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE YOON, ERIC —
18663216 TAP MACHINING METHOD AND TAP MACHINING APPARATUS GATES, ERIC ANDREW —
18644302 JOINED BODY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF POLLOCK, AUSTIN M —
18602142 CUTTING FLUID CIRCULATION DEVICE MENON, KRISHNAN S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3722 1
1777 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18919637 PLACEMENT IDENTIFYING APPARATUS CHANG, VINCENT WEN-LIANG — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18908899 VIBRATION CHARACTERISTIC ESTIMATION SYSTEM IN MACHINE TOOL, MACHINE TOOL, AND VIBRATION CHARACTERISTIC ESTIMATION METHOD BUTLER, KEVIN C — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18804208 DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE YOON, ERIC — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18663216 TAP MACHINING METHOD AND TAP MACHINING APPARATUS GATES, ERIC ANDREW 3722 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2024
18644302 JOINED BODY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF POLLOCK, AUSTIN M — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 24, 2024
18602142 CUTTING FLUID CIRCULATION DEVICE MENON, KRISHNAN S 1777 §102Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 12, 2024

Managing Okuma Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month