Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/219,792

DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING DISPLAY PANEL, OPERATING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 27, 2025
Examiner
LANDIS, LISA S
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
452 granted / 545 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
562
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 05/27/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6-14, and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Publication No. 2019/0114970 to Moradi et al. (Moradi). As to claims 1 and 19, Moradi discloses a display device comprising: a display panel including display areas (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, display panel, 107, with plurality of pixels, 200); a controller configured to control display a video through the display panel based on video frames being sequentially provided, each of the video frames including video data blocks corresponding to the display areas, respectively (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, 0056, digital controller, 103, digital video data); and an indicator generator configured to generate a block indicator having a value that is changed based on power-on being performed (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, 0065, Readout Circuit (ROC), 106; extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200), wherein the controller is configured to: select the video data block that is indicated by the block indicator from the video data blocks of a video frame that is first provided among the video frames (Para. 0056, 0065, controller 103 may then send signals 120 comprising digital video data to the source driver 105 and signals 118 to the gate (address) driver 102 to select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and to program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data), and update an accumulative stress data set of a corresponding display area from among the display areas based on the selected video data block of the video frame (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 19, Moradi additionally discloses a display system comprising: a processor (Para. 0027, processors); and a display device configured to receive video frames from the processor and to display a video based on the video frames (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, display system, 100). As to claim 2, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the block indicator indicates any one of the video data blocks (Fig. 1; Para. 0065, extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200). As to claim 6, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the display areas comprises first to m-th (where, m is an integer that is larger than 1) display areas (Para. 0056, pixel row), wherein the video frames include first to m-th video frames that are sequentially provided after the power-on (Para. 0056, each pixel is driven), wherein the video data blocks included in each of the first to m-th video frames include first to m-th video data blocks corresponding to the first to m-th display areas, respectively (Para. 0056, 0065, controller 103 may then send signals 120 comprising digital video data to the source driver 105 and signals 118 to the gate (address) driver 102 to select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and to program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data), and wherein the video frame that is first provided among the video frames is the first video frame (Para. 0056, digital video data). As to claim 7, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 6, wherein the block indicator indicates the k- th (where, k is an integer that is larger than or equal to 1 and smaller than or equal to m) video data block among the first to m-th video data blocks (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, 0065, measurements on a selected pixel circuit or circuits through a data line 114, extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200). As to claim 8, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 7, wherein based on the block indicator indicating any one of the second to (m-1)-th video data blocks, the controller is configured to: select the k-th to m-th video data blocks and the first to (k-1)-th video data blocks from the first to m-th video frames (Para. 0056, select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data), and update k-th to m-th accumulative stress data sets and first to (k-1)-th accumulative stress data sets corresponding to the k-th to m-th display areas and the first to (k-1)-th display areas based on the k-th to m-th video data blocks and the first to (k-1)-th video data blocks, respectively (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 9, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 7, wherein based on the block indicator indicating the m-th video data block, the controller is configured to: select the m-th video data block and the first to (m-1)-th video data blocks from the first to m-th video frames (Para. 0056, select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data), and update an m-th accumulative stress data set and first to (m-1)-th accumulative stress data sets corresponding to the m-th display area and the first to (m-1)-th display areas based on the m-th video data block and the first to (m-1)-th video data blocks, respectively (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 10, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 7, wherein based on the block indicator indicating the first video data block, the controller is configured to: select the first to m-th video data blocks from the first to m-th video frames (Para. 0056, select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data), and update first to m-th accumulative stress data sets corresponding to the first to m- th display areas based on the first to m-th video data blocks, respectively (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 11, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to: extract a different video data block among the video data blocks from the respective video frames (Fig. 1; Para. 0065, extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200), and update the accumulative stress data set corresponding to the corresponding display area based on the different video data block (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 12, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the video frames are video frames that are first provided after the power-on (Para. 0056, 0065, controller 103 may then send signals 120 comprising digital video data to the source driver 105 and signals 118 to the gate (address) driver 102 to select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and to program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data). As to claim 13, Moradi discloses the display device of claim 1, further comprising: a working memory connected to the controller (Fig. 1; Para. 0027, 0053, RAM); and a nonvolatile memory connected to the controller (Fig. 1; Para. 0027, 0053, non-volatile storage), wherein the controller is configured to: update the accumulative stress data set in the working memory (Fig. 1; Para. 0027, 0053, RAM; memory, 104); and store the accumulative stress data set of the working memory in the nonvolatile memory in a predetermined period of time (Fig. 1; Para. 0027, 0053, non-volatile storage; memory, 104). As to claim 14, Moradi discloses an operating method of a display device including display areas, the operating method comprising: generating a block indicator having a value that is changed based on power-on being performed (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, 0065, extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200); receiving video frames being sequentially provided and to be displayed on the display device as a video, each of the video frames including video data blocks corresponding to the display areas, respectively (Fig. 1; Para. 0053, 0056, digital controller, 103, digital video data); selecting a video data block that is indicated by the block indicator from the video data blocks of the video frame that is first provided among the video frames (Para. 0056, 0065, controller 103 may then send signals 120 comprising digital video data to the source driver 105 and signals 118 to the gate (address) driver 102 to select the pixel circuits 200 in the display panel 107 on row by row basis and to program pixel circuits 200 to display the video information comprised in the video data); and updating an accumulative stress data set of a corresponding display area from among the display areas based on the selected video data block of the video frame (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 18, Moradi discloses the operating method of claim 14, further comprising: extracting next video data blocks of the video data block that is indicated by the block indicator from next video frames of a video frame that is first provided among the video frames (Fig. 1; Para. 0065, extract information indicative of a degradation of the pixel circuit 200); and updating the accumulative stress data sets of the corresponding display areas based on the extracted video data blocks (Para. 0065, Controller 103 may be configured to use the pixel degradation information contained in the measured current to compensate for that degradation during normal operation of the display). As to claim 20, Moradi discloses the display system of claim 19, wherein the display system is one of a digital television (TV), a three-dimensional (3D) TV, a personal computer, a home appliance, a laptop computer, a table computer, a mobile phone, a smartphone, a personal digital assistant, a portable multimedia player, a digital camera, a music player, a portable game console, and a navigation device (Para. 0058, mobile devices, monitor-based devices, TVs and projection devices). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 and 15-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lisa S Landis whose telephone number is (571)270-1061. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at (571)272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LISA S LANDIS/Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596462
TERMINAL DEVICE AND POSITION DETECTION SENSOR INCLUDING SENSOR ELECTRODES AND LINEAR MEMBERS ARRANGED IN BETWEEN BACKGROUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596447
DEVICE FOR DETECTING AND ACTIVE INPUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592189
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591346
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588152
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING DIGITIZER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month