Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/220,242

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
May 28, 2025
Examiner
AZONGHA, SARDIS F
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
501 granted / 616 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
631
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to 05/28/2025. Claim 1 is pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,423,313 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. The claims are compared with each other in the following: Claim set A: US Patent 11,424,313 B2 Claim set B: US Application 19/220,242 1. A display device comprising: a substrate including a display area and a non-display area; 1. A display device comprising: a substrate including a display area and a non-display area; pixels disposed on the display area; pixels disposed on the display area; a first common voltage line at least partially disposed on the display area; a first common voltage line at least partially disposed on the display area; an outer common voltage trunk line disposed on the non-display area, electrically connected through the first common voltage line to the pixels, and comprises a groove; an outer common voltage trunk line disposed on the non-display area, electrically connected through the first common voltage line to the pixels, and comprises a groove; a first outer common voltage line protruding from the outer common voltage trunk line; and a first outer common voltage line protruding from the outer common voltage trunk line; and a second outer common voltage line protruding from the outer common voltage trunk line, a second outer common voltage line protruding from the outer common voltage trunk line, wherein the groove is disposed between the second outer common voltage line and the first common voltage line. wherein the groove is disposed between the second outer common voltage line and the first common voltage line. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARDIS F AZONGHA whose telephone number is (571)270-7706. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-7:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at (571)272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARDIS F AZONGHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598830
SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597630
BATTERIES WITH NON-RECTANGULAR SHAPES FOR AUGMENTED REALITY DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578579
EYEWEAR WITH INTEGRATED PERIPHERAL DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575273
Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567371
DISPLAY DRIVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (-1.9%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month