Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/221,091

INTELLIGENT DOWNLOAD OF CONTENT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 28, 2025
Priority
Aug 17, 2017 — provisional 62/546,592 +4 more
Examiner
KURIEN, CHRISTEN A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Roku Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
258 granted / 456 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
474
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
89.9%
+49.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 456 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-20 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12342012. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are different definitions or descriptions of the same subject matter varying in breadth and because of the claims in the instant application are broader than the claims in '012. A comparison of the claim language follows, where the similar language is underlined for identification: U.S. Patent No. 12342012 Instant Application 19/221091 A computer implemented method for intelligently downloading content, comprising: receiving a request for the content from a user; downloading a first quality version of the content from a content server in response to the receiving the request; playing the first quality version of the content on a user device; in response to the playing, determining a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot when the user intends to playback the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is greater than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, requesting the second quality version of the content; downloading the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinuing the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and playing the second quality version of the content on the user device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued. A computer-implemented method for intelligently downloading content, comprising: downloading a first quality version of the content from a content server; outputting, by at least one computer processor, the first quality version of the content on a user device; in response to the outputting, determining a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot for outputting the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is lower than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, requesting the second quality version of the content; downloading the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinuing the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and outputting the second quality version of the content on the user device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued U.S. Patent No. 12342012 Instant Application 19/221091 8. A user device, comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive a request for content from a user; download a first quality version of the content from a content server in response to the receiving the request; play the first quality version of the content on the user device; in response to the playing, determine a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot when the user intends to playback the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is greater than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, request the second quality version of the content; download the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinue the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and play the second quality version of the content on the user device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued. A user device, comprising: one or more memories; and at least one processor each coupled to at least one of the memories and configured to perform operations comprising: downloading a first quality version of the content from a content server; outputting the first quality version of the content on the user device; in response to the outputting, determining a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot for outputting the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is lower than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, requesting the second quality version of the content; downloading the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinuing the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and outputting the second quality version of the content on the user device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued. U.S. Patent No. 12342012 Instant Application 19/221091 15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one computing device, cause the at least one computing device to perform operations comprising: receiving a request for content from a user; downloading a first quality version of the content from a content server in response to the receiving the request; playing the first quality version of the content on the at least one computing device; in response to the playing, determining a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot when the user intends to playback the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is greater than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, requesting the second quality version of the content; downloading the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinuing the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and playing the second quality version of the content on the at least one computing device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued. 15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one computing device, cause the at least one computing device to perform operations comprising: downloading a first quality version of the content from a content server; outputting the first quality version of the content on the at least one computing device; in response to the outputting, determining a second quality version of the content among a plurality of quality versions of the content to download based on a future time slot for outputting the content, wherein a resolution of the second quality version of the content is lower than a resolution of the first quality version of the content; in response to the determining, requesting the second quality version of the content; downloading the second quality version of the content in response to the requesting the second quality version of the content; discontinuing the downloading of the first quality version of the content based on the downloading of the second quality version of the content; and outputting the second quality version of the content on the at least one computing device at a point in the content where the downloading of the first quality version of the content was discontinued. Claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 of the instant application are similar to claims 2-7, 10-14, 16-20 in patent application ‘012. Citation of Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. 2002/0059642A1 to Russ et al. (“Russ”) discloses a master device interactively distributes a television signal to a remote device for remote display with low latency between a user input and a television signal change. U.S. Patent Pub. NO. 2009/0328124 A! to Khouzam et al (“Khouzam”) discloses adaptive video switching for variable network conditions. U.S Patent Pub. NO. 2002/0209005A11 to Shaver et al. (“Shaver”) discloses a systems and methods for a single development tool of unified online and offline content providing a similar viewing experience. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE A KURIEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5694. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached on 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE A KURIEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2421 /NATHAN J FLYNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12647638
SUPPORT INTERACTION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12634552
DISPLAY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634556
FILTERING TELEVISION CONTENT BASED ON VIEWER CLASSIFICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634554
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626619
Display Method, Display Control Device, and Display Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+27.4%)
3y 9m (~2y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 456 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month