Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/221,695

DISPLAY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE DISPLAY

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
May 29, 2025
Priority
Dec 25, 2017 — JP 2017-247227 +5 more
Examiner
ZHENG, XUEMEI
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
604 granted / 713 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
63.1%
+23.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 713 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 8/25/2025 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.98(a)(4) because it lacks the appropriate size fee assertion. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11,222,583 (resulting from App. No. 16/768,720)). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because: Claim 1 of this application Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11,222,583 A display comprising: a pixel comprising: a display element comprising a micro light-emitting diode; and a microcontroller comprising a first transistor, a triangular wave generator circuit, a comparator, a switch, and a constant current circuit, wherein the first transistor is configured to retain a potential corresponding to data written to the pixel by being turned off, wherein the comparator is configured to generate an output signal in accordance with the potential and a triangular wave signal from the triangular wave generator circuit, wherein the switch is configured to control whether or not to make a current flowing in the constant current circuit flow to the display element in accordance with the output signal, and wherein the constant current circuit comprises: a third transistor comprising an oxide semiconductor in a channel formation region; and a fourth transistor comprising silicon in a channel formation region. A display comprising: a pixel comprising: a display element comprising a micro light-emitting diode; and a microcontroller comprising a first transistor, a triangular wave generator circuit, a comparator, a switch, and a constant current circuit, wherein the first transistor is configured to retain a potential corresponding to data written to the pixel by being turned off, wherein the comparator is configured to generate an output signal in accordance with the potential and a triangular wave signal from the triangular wave generator circuit, wherein the switch is configured to control whether or not to make a current flowing in the constant current circuit flow to the display element in accordance with the output signal, and wherein the constant current circuit comprises: a second transistor comprising an oxide semiconductor in a channel formation region; and a third transistor comprising silicon in a channel formation region. As can be seen from the above comparison, claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11,222,583 teaches each feature of claim 1 of this instant application (Note: “a second transistor” in the former reads on “a third transistor” in the latter and “a third transistor” in the former reads on “a fourth transistor” in the latter). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US Patent No. 9, 608,614 by Sugiyama et al. discloses in Fig. 15 a related technique to the instant invention, wherein a microcontroller is employed for driving a pixel, the microcontroller including a comparator 33 and a constant current circuit 34. The structure of constant current circuit 34, however, is not specified. US 2014/0292745 by Kikuchi et al. discloses in Fig. 1A a related technique to the instant invention, wherein a microcontroller is employed for driving a pixel, the microcontroller including a comparator 12 and a constant current source 13. The structure of constant current source 13, however, is not specified. US 2003/0142048 by Nishitani et al. discloses in Fig. 1 a related technique to the instant invention, wherein a microcontroller is employed for driving a pixel, the microcontroller including a comparator Cop (m,n) and a constant current source providing constant current An. The structure of constant current source, however, is not specified. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUEMEI ZHENG whose telephone number is (571)272-1434. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9:30 pm-6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached at 571-272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUEMEI ZHENG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638682
Systems With Supplemental Illumination
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640086
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, DRIVING METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641881
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634430
NONINTRUSIVE HEAD-MOUNTED DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12632123
Training a Machine-Learned Module for Radar-Based Gesture Detection in an Ambient Compute Environment
1y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 713 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month