Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/225,706

GAS TURBINE ENGINE WITH BYPASS TOBI COOLING/PURGE FLOW AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Priority
Apr 04, 2023 — continuation of 12/320,270
Examiner
FORD, RENE D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
RTX Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
366 granted / 457 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
475
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 457 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 of the claim set received 06/02/2025 are pending. Claim Objections Applicant is advised that should claim 10 be found allowable, claim 15 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 7 recitation of “exit” should be written “exiting”. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 1 and 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 4 recitation of “a high-pressure turbine” should be written “a high-pressure turbine (HPT)” to provide antecedence for the further use of HPT in the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Napoli (US 4,466,239). Regarding Claim 1, Napoli discloses in Fig. 2, a gas turbine engine having an axial centerline, comprising: a high-pressure compressor (HPC) 18 having an HPC discharge 46 at an aft end of the HPC; a combustor section having a combustor 21; a high-pressure turbine (HPT) 19; wherein a core gas path extends through the HPC, the combustor section, and the HPT; wherein the HPC 18 is configured to allow a gas leakage flow (into 33 as read in col. 3, ll. 34-37) to separate from a core gas flow passing through the core gas path and exit the HPC; a bypass tangential on board injector (TOBI) system that extends circumferentially around the engine axial centerline, the bypass TOBI system having a plurality of nozzles 61, an inner radial side (as shown in the annotation of Fig. 4 below), an outer radial side (as shown in the annotation), a plurality of first passages (a first subset of the passages through elements 71), and a plurality of second passages (a second subset of the passages through elements 71); PNG media_image1.png 623 792 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the HPC discharge 46 and the combustor 21 are configured such that a portion of the core gas flow that exits the HPC discharge is directed to the bypass TOBI system as a diffuser inner diameter (ID) flow (see flow through 50 and 61 above) and the bypass TOBI system is configured so that the diffuser ID flow passes through the plurality of nozzles 61; and wherein the plurality of first passages (the first subset of passages through elements 71) are disposed to receive the gas leakage flow (that of chamber 36 shown above) and direct the gas leakage flow from the inner radial side to the outer radial side along a first path (through one of the first passages) without mixing with the diffuser ID flow; and wherein the plurality of second passages (the second subset of passages through elements 71) are disposed to receive the gas leakage flow and direct the gas leakage flow from the inner radial side to the outer radial side along a second path (through one of the second passages) without mixing with the diffuser ID flow, wherein the second path is different than the first path (the first path through a first passage and the second path through a second passage); and wherein the plurality of first passages and the plurality of second passages 71 are configured to produce a pressure balance between a first chamber 70 or 62 and a second chamber 62 or 72, respectively, of the bypass TOBI system (in the same manner as the respective first chambers 92 or 116 and second chamber 90 of instant application). Regarding Claim 2, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4 as annotated above, wherein the inner radial side is disposed between the plurality of nozzles 61 and the engine axial centerline, and the plurality of nozzles 61 are disposed between the engine axial centerline and the outer radial side. Regarding Claim 3, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4 as annotated above, wherein the first chamber 70 is disposed on the inner radial side and the second chamber 62 is disposed on the outer radial side. Regarding Claim 4, Napoli discloses in Figs. 2 and 4, wherein a first inner radial seal (see annotation of the figure below) is disposed to seal between the first chamber 70 and the second chamber 62. PNG media_image2.png 285 792 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 5, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the first inner radial seal and a second inner radial seal (see annotation of Fig. 4 above; substantially equivalent to the first 102 and second seal 104 of the instant application as shown in Fig. 4 of the instant application) define boundaries of the first chamber 70 (in the same manner as seals 102 and 104 define boundaries of first chamber 116 of the instant application shown in Fig. 4 of the instant application). Regarding Claim 6, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the first inner radial seal and the second inner radial seal that define boundaries of the first chamber are disposed contiguous with and radially inward of an annular body 58+74+75 containing the plurality of nozzles 61. Regarding Claim 7, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein a portion of the second chamber 62 is disposed contiguous with and radially outward of the annular body 58+74+75 containing the plurality of nozzles 61. Regarding Claim 8, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein a boundary of the second chamber 62 is defined by a first outer radial seal (see annotation of the figure below). PNG media_image3.png 291 792 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 9, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the plurality of nozzles 61 are in fluid communication with the second chamber 62. Regarding Claims 10 and 15, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4 and the two annotations of the figure above, wherein the first inner radial seal, the second inner radial seal, and the first outer radial seal are knife edge seals. Regarding Claim 11, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the first chamber 62 and the second chamber 72 are disposed on the outer radial side (see defined outer radial side in the annotation of Fig. 4 above; pressure balance between the chambers is produced by the first and second passageways through element 71 providing pressurized air into second chamber 72 that will reduce any possible leakage through seal 63). Regarding Claim 12, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein a first inner radial seal and a first outer radial seal define boundaries of the first chamber 62 (see annotation of Fig. 4 below). PNG media_image4.png 448 792 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 13, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4 as annotated below, wherein the first outer radial seal and a second radial outer seal define boundaries of the second chamber 72. PNG media_image5.png 302 792 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 14, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the plurality of nozzles 61 are in fluid communication with the first chamber 62. Regarding Claim 16, Napoli discloses in Figs. 2 and 4, a gas turbine engine having an axial centerline (conventional rotational axis of the engine), comprising: a high-pressure compressor (HPC) 18 having an HPC discharge 46 at an aft end of the HPC; a combustor section having a combustor 21; a high-pressure turbine (HPT) 19; wherein a core gas path extends through the HPC, the combustor section, and the HPT; wherein the HPC 18 is configured to allow a gas leakage flow (into 33 as read in col. 3, ll. 34-37) to separate from a core gas flow passing through the core gas path and exit the HPC; and a bypass tangential on board injector (TOBI) system that extends circumferentially around the engine axial centerline, the bypass TOBI system having an annular body 58+74+75 that includes a plurality of nozzles 61 circumferentially spaced apart from one another, a plurality of first passages (a first subset of the passages through elements 71) extending from an inner radial side of the annular body to an outer radial side of the annular body, and a plurality of second passages (a second subset of the passages through elements 71) extending from the inner radial side of the annular body to the outer radial side of the annular body (see defined side in the annotation of Fig. 4 below), wherein the first passages and the second passages are circumferentially spaced apart from one another (formed of distinct tube 71); PNG media_image1.png 623 792 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the plurality of first passages and the plurality of second passages 71 are configured to produce a pressure balance between a first chamber 70 or 62 and a second chamber 62 or 72, respectively, of the bypass TOBI system (in the same manner as the respective first chambers 92 or 116 and second chamber 90 of instant application). Regarding Claim 17, Napoli discloses in the annotation of Fig. 4 above, wherein the first chamber 70 is disposed on the inner radial side and the second chamber 62 is disposed on the outer radial side. Regarding Claim 18, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the plurality of nozzles 61 are in fluid communication with the second chamber 62. Regarding Claim 19, Napoli discloses wherein the first chamber 62 and the second chamber 72 are disposed on the outer radial side (see annotation of Fig. 4 above). Regarding Claim 20, Napoli discloses in Fig. 4, wherein the plurality of nozzles 61 are in fluid communication with the first chamber 62. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found in the attached Notice of References Cited. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RENE D FORD whose telephone number is (571)272-8140. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat Wongwian can be reached on (571) 270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.D.F/Examiner, Art Unit 3741 /PHUTTHIWAT WONGWIAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741081
INFUSION SET, SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH AN INFUSION SET, AND USE OF SUCH A SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729005
ENERGY CONVERSION ARRANGEMENT, ENERGY SYSTEM AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12698716
TURBINE ENGINE WITH A BLADE ASSEMBLY HAVING A SET OF COOLING CONDUITS
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692795
GAS TURBINE ENGINE TURBINE SECTION WITH AXIAL SEAL
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12662978
ACOUSTIC PANEL WITH DIFFERENT CELL CONFIGURATIONS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 457 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month