Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/225,829

WING FOR AN AIRCRAFT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Examiner
BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW
Art Unit
3647
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Airbus Operations GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
891 granted / 983 resolved
+38.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
997
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 983 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: reference # 67 is in paragraph 0042 of the specification but is not in the figures. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: reference # 41 & 71 in figures 2 & 3 are not in the specification. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the second drive arm" in claim 12, line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For compact prosecution, the Examiner is interpreting "the second drive arm" in claim 12, line 9, as -- a second drive arm --. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are allowed. However, 112 issues need to be resolved. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, The prior art does not disclose or suggest the claimed “wherein the rigid portion is mounted to the first link element rotatably about a second axis of rotation, the drive unit comprises a rotary actuator mounted to the main wing and having at least one drive arm rotatably driven about a drive axis and drivingly engaging the first link element, one of the drive arm and the first link element comprises at least one groove and the other one of the drive arm and the first link element comprises at least one spigot drivingly engaging the groove” in combination with the remaining claim elements as set forth in claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The reference Schlipf et al. (Pub No. US 2022/0388629 A1) discloses an aircraft a wing, a leading edge high lift assembly, a main wing, the leading edge high lift assembly comprising a high lift body and a connection assembly connecting the high lift body to the main wing in such a way that the high lift body is movable relative to the main wing between a stowed position and a deployed position, wherein the connection assembly comprises a linkage including a first link element that is mounted to the high lift body and that is mounted to the main wing rotatably about a first axis of rotation, wherein the main wing comprises an upper skin panel and a lower skin panel, wherein the upper skin panel has a leading edge portion, wherein the high lift body comprises a rigid portion wherein the rigid portion is mounted to the first link element, wherein the connection assembly comprises a drive unit mounted to the main wing and coupled to the first link element for driving the first link element for rotation about the first axis of rotation, wherein the rigid portion is mounted to the first link element, the drive unit comprises a rotary actuator mounted to the main wing and having at least one drive arm rotatably driven about a drive axis and drivingly engaging the first link element, one of the drive arm and the first link element comprises at least one groove and the other one of the drive arm and the first link element comprises at least one spigot drivingly engaging the groove; wherein the spigot or the groove is provided at a lateral side of the first link element or at an additional holder structure comprised by the first link element; wherein the spigot engages the groove with a predefined play; wherein the groove is formed as a slot extending in a radial direction with respect to the drive axis; wherein the groove is open at an outer end of the drive arm; and wherein the connection assembly is a first connection assembly and the leading edge high lift assembly comprises a second connection assembly connecting the high lift body to the main wing in a position spaced apart from the first connection assembly, wherein the first connection assembly and the second connection assembly are coupled by a sync arrangement for synchronized movement between the stowed position and the deployed position. The reference Gartelmann (Pub No. US 2022/0306277 A1) discloses an aircraft a wing, a leading edge high lift assembly, a main wing, the leading edge high lift assembly comprising a high lift body and a connection assembly connecting the high lift body to the main wing in such a way that the high lift body is movable relative to the main wing between a stowed position and a deployed position, wherein the connection assembly comprises a linkage including a first link element that is mounted to the high lift body and that is mounted to the main wing rotatably about a first axis of rotation, wherein the main wing comprises an upper skin panel and a lower skin panel, wherein the upper skin panel has a leading edge portion, wherein the high lift body comprises a rigid portion and a flexible skin portion, wherein the rigid portion is mounted to the first link element, wherein the flexible skin portion is connected to the leading edge portion of the upper skin panel of the main wing and is connected to the rigid portion of the high lift body, and wherein the flexible skin portion is configured to be deformed between a stowed deformation state and a deployed deformation state, when the high lift body is moved between the stowed position and the deployed position. The reference Schlipf et al. (Pub No. US 2025/0206437 A1) & Schlipf et al. (US Patent No. 12,539,959 B2) each have the same Assignee and 1 common Inventor with the Instant Application and each disclose similar structure as the reference Schlipf et al. (Pub No. US 2022/0388629 A1) cited above and additionally disclose a groove with a curved form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY ANDREW BONNETTE whose telephone number is (571)270-7556. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kimberly Berona can be reached at 571-272-6909. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY A BONNETTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600456
VTOL Aircraft for Network System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595078
AEROSPACE VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583594
Multi-engine assembly and installation method for electric aircraft propulsion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576980
Hydrofoil Equipped Seaglider Takeoff
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576962
AIRCRAFT CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 983 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month