Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/241,068

Telescoping Bed Frames

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Priority
Feb 15, 2019 — provisional 62/806,516 +5 more
Examiner
MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The Lovesac Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
231 granted / 288 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
307
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
83.2%
+43.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 288 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application Claims 1-2 have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on merits. The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 11/06/2025 and 03/06/2026 has been acknowledged by the Office. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jin (US 20120222216 A1). In regards to Claim 1, Jin teaches: A telescoping bed frame (100 - Fig. 3 vs. Fig. 4 vs. Fig. 5), comprising:(i) a plurality of support modules (102, 104 - Figs. 3-5); and (ii) a plurality of corner modules that are movably connected to the support modules (134 - Figs. 3-5), the corner modules each being comprised of a corner member (12 - Fig. 4) having two ends that are positioned at a substantially transverse angle with respect to each other (see annotated Fig. 5.1 from Jin), each of the ends of a respective corner member being movably coupled to a respective support module (132 is moveably coupled to one of the support modules while, 120 is selectively attached/detached to one of the support modules shown in Figs. 3-5), such that each corner module selectively moves with respect to each of the support modules to which it is coupled (Figs. 3-5, showing movement in Fig. 4), such that the telescoping bed frame is configured to form a first modular bed frame having a first selected geometry (Fig. 3) and is telescopically reconfigurable to form a second modular bed frame having a second selected geometry (Fig. 5). PNG media_image1.png 615 996 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5.1 from Jin In regards to Claim 2, Jin teaches: A telescoping bed frame as recited in claim 1, wherein the support modules are bed frame rails (Para 0030: "Referring to FIGS. 1-5, a foldable bed frame of a first embodiment of the present invention 100 (sometimes referred to as 100.sub.1 and 100.sub.2) is illustrated. The foldable bed frame 100 includes a pair of first sub-frames 102, 104. Each first sub-frame 102, 104 includes a pair of spaced apart longitudinal bars 110 in parallel arrangement."). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Taylor et al., (US 6338172 B1) teaches: An all polymeric bed frame including opposing laterally spaced apart, elongated side rails, each of the side rails having first and second ends and comprised of a substantially vertical wall and a horizontal support ledge extending laterally from a lower edge of the substantially vertical wall. The bed frame further includes an end cap positioned at least one of the side rail first or second ends, with end caps adapted for connection to a conventional bed headboard. The end cap is positioned substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal dimension of the side rails. The bed frame further includes at least two spaced apart slats attached to the horizontal support members between said side rail first and second ends. The said side rails and the said two slats are comprised of a polymeric material selected from the group consisting of polyethylene, polyethylene copolymers, polypropylene, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Mullikin (US 8955176 B1) teaches: An adjustable bed frame that includes a headboard, a footboard, a quartet of support posts associated with the headboard and footboard, and support frames that connect the headboard posts to the footboard posts. Both the headboard and footboard are fabricated from two equal halves that can be separated, exposing an internal leaf. Both the headboard and footboard, in conjunction with their internal leaves, can be adjusted to a variety of lengths to accommodate various-sized box springs and mattresses as needed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MADISON MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)272-8473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Justin Mikowski can be reached at (571)-272-8525. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MADISON MATTHEWS Primary Examiner Art Unit 3673 /MADISON MATTHEWS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3673 06/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678360
Patient Support Device for Positioning During a Surgical Procedure and Lateral Patient Transfer
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661289
Portable Patient Lift
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663094
Plunger With Rear Facing Bumper for Air Manifold
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661290
INTEGRATED PATIENT LIFT AND TRANSFER SYSTEM
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653334
CAVITY CONTOUR PILLOW
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.8%)
2y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 288 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month