Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

The Lovesac Company

9 pending office actions • 6 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (44%)
5
Medium (56%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (33%)
§102 only2 (22%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (44%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
22% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE 2 80.1% +35.4%
ARTALEJO, ELIZABETH IRENE 1 46.4% -25.0%
HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE 1 70.4% +22.1%
TAN, DING Y 1 75.6% +17.8%
NGUYEN, QUYNH H 1 87.3% +17.2%
WIECHERT, QIAWEN W 1 100.0% +0.0%
HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL 1 81.2% +22.6%
GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA 1 54.4% +61.8%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18751704 ELECTRONIC FURNITURE SYSTEMS WITH INTEGRATED INDUCTION CHARGER NGUYEN, QUYNH H 46d
19241068 Telescoping Bed Frames MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE
29940035 FURNITURE WIECHERT, QIAWEN W

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18456284 MODULAR MATTRESS SYSTEMS MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE 21d
18624640 FURNITURE ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEMS HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL 29d
18817066 MODULAR CABINET ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE
18812777 RECONFIGURABLE MODULAR FURNITURE ASSEMBLY WITH CONNECTOR LEG ASSEMBLY TAN, DING Y

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18296324 ACOUSTICALLY TRANSPARENT PILLOW GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA 9d
18456284 MODULAR MATTRESS SYSTEMS MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE 21d
18624640 FURNITURE ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEMS HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL 29d
18751704 ELECTRONIC FURNITURE SYSTEMS WITH INTEGRATED INDUCTION CHARGER NGUYEN, QUYNH H 46d
19241068 Telescoping Bed Frames MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE
18817066 MODULAR CABINET ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE
18812777 RECONFIGURABLE MODULAR FURNITURE ASSEMBLY WITH CONNECTOR LEG ASSEMBLY TAN, DING Y

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3637 2
3673 2
3632 1
2693 1
2932 1
3644 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19241068 Telescoping Bed Frames MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 17, 2025
18817062 CASEGOOD FURNITURE SYSTEMS, ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS ARTALEJO, ELIZABETH IRENE 3637 §103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Aug 27, 2024
18817066 MODULAR CABINET ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE 3637 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 27, 2024
18812777 RECONFIGURABLE MODULAR FURNITURE ASSEMBLY WITH CONNECTOR LEG ASSEMBLY TAN, DING Y 3632 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 22, 2024
18751704 ELECTRONIC FURNITURE SYSTEMS WITH INTEGRATED INDUCTION CHARGER NGUYEN, QUYNH H 2693 §103 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Jun 24, 2024
29940035 FURNITURE WIECHERT, QIAWEN W 2932 §102 Final Rejection Pending Apr 30, 2024
18624640 FURNITURE ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEMS HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL 3644 §103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Apr 02, 2024
18456284 MODULAR MATTRESS SYSTEMS MATTHEWS, MADISON ROSE 3673 §102§112 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Aug 25, 2023
18296324 ACOUSTICALLY TRANSPARENT PILLOW GEDEON, DEBORAH TALITHA 3673 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Apr 05, 2023

Managing The Lovesac Company's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month