Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/244,553

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jun 20, 2025
Examiner
PERVAN, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
736 granted / 912 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
927
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 912 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,382,776. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Present Application U.S. Patent No. 12,382,776 1. A display device, comprising: a first pixel that includes a first pixel driving circuit and a first light emitting element; a second pixel that includes a second pixel driving circuit and a second light emitting element; a sensor that includes a sensor driving circuit and a light detection element; a first data line that extends in a first direction and is electrically connected to the first pixel; a second data line that extends in the first direction and is electrically connected to the second pixel; and a readout line that extends in the first direction and is electrically connected to the sensor, wherein the readout line is disposed on a different layer from at least one of the first data line and the second data line. 1. A display device, comprising: a first pixel that includes a first pixel driving circuit and a first light emitting element; a second pixel that includes a second pixel driving circuit and a second light emitting element; a sensor that includes a sensor driving circuit and a light detection element; a first data line that extends in a first direction and is electrically connected to the first pixel; a second data line that extends in the first direction and is electrically connected to the second pixel; and a readout line that extends in the first direction and is electrically connected to the sensor, wherein the readout line is disposed on a different layer from at least one of the first data line and the second data line. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jung et al (US 2012/0032911) discloses a readout line disposed on a different layer than the data line. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Pervan whose telephone number is (571)272-0910. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri between 7:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached at (571) 272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL PERVAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629 January 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596450
Method of controlling touch sensor and related touch sensing circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588852
NEURAL INTERFACE SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578769
HOUSING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566521
TOUCH PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION PATTERN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554342
TOUCH PAD AND COMPUTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 912 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month