Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/246,280

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED AIRFRAME STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ELEMENTS

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Examiner
ABELL, TYE W
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rapidflight Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
442 granted / 516 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
532
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 516 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This action is in response to the application filed 23 June 2025 which is a Continuation of application 18/532,324 now US Patent 12,337,946 filed 7 December 2023 which is Continuation of applications 18/103,992 now US Patent 11,840,323 filed 31 January 2023 and 17/559,829 now US Patent 11,597,490 filed 22 December 2021. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,337,946. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found in PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYE W ABELL whose telephone number is (303) 297-4408. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 0700-1500 CST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached on 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /TYE WILLIAM ABELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644 6 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600492
AEROSTAT TETHER INSTALLATION, HANDLING, DAMAGE CONTROL, AND QUICK REPLACEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600453
AIR SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR A SHIP, SHIP INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF SUPPLYING AIR TO AN AIR LUBRICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600442
AQUATIC UTILITY VEHICLE AND SUSPENSION SYSTEM THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595046
LANDING GEAR FOR AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590558
DRAG RECOVERY SCHEME USING BOUNDARY LAYER INGESTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 516 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month