Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/246,280

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED AIRFRAME STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ELEMENTS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Priority
Dec 22, 2021 — continuation of 11/597,490 +2 more
Examiner
ABELL, TYE W
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rapidflight Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
447 granted / 528 resolved
+32.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
538
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This action is in response to the application filed 23 June 2025 which is a Continuation of application 18/532,324 now US Patent 12,337,946 filed 7 December 2023 which is Continuation of applications 18/103,992 now US Patent 11,840,323 filed 31 January 2023 and 17/559,829 now US Patent 11,597,490 filed 22 December 2021. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,337,946. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found in PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYE W ABELL whose telephone number is (303) 297-4408. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 0700-1500 CST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached on 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /TYE WILLIAM ABELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644 6 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702234
SWAYBILIZER SWING ARMS FOR ATTACHMENT TO A CHAIR
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698106
DRONE SHADE CANOPY USING AD-BALLOON AND FRAME, AND SHADE CANOPY USING SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698089
FLUIDIC PROPULSIVE SYSTEM AND THRUST AND LIFT GENERATOR FOR AERIAL VEHICLES
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686494
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MOBILE TOWING AND LIFTING PLATFORMS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686311
MOVABLE HEADREST MODULE, SEAT, VEHICLE AND METHOD OF DISASSEMBLING AND ASSEMBLING A SEAT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 3m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month