Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rapidflight Holdings LLC currently manages a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio has 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This creates a highly concentrated prosecution landscape where a single matter and a single official represent the company's entire current activity at the patent office.
The activity is focused within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical niche within the broader transportation and mechanical systems field. ABELL, TYE W is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This action accounts for the entirety of the company's pending workload. The 1 pending office action is currently the only matter on the docket.
Practitioners should focus their efforts on understanding the specific examination style of ABELL, TYE W. With only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, there are no other active cases to provide broader context or alternative paths for the company's IP. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit further emphasizes the need for a precise and targeted strategy for this single pending matter, as the outcome is entirely dependent on the assigned official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABELL, TYE W | 1 | 84.5% | +16.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19246280 | ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED AIRFRAME STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ELEMENTS | ABELL, TYE W | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19246280 | ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED AIRFRAME STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ELEMENTS | ABELL, TYE W | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19246280 | ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED AIRFRAME STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ELEMENTS | ABELL, TYE W | 3644 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Jun 23, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial