Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/248,150

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Priority
Oct 21, 2019 — provisional 62/923,713 +6 more
Examiner
ORTIZ, ELIM
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
463 granted / 585 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
85.4%
+45.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 21-40 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. US 12,403,787. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the scope of the current application and the patent overlap in such a manner that they are not patentably distinguishable. Current Application US 12,40,3787 35. A computer-implemented method for electric vehicle charging management associated with electric vehicles and charging locations capable of charging the electric vehicles, the computer-implemented method implemented by at least one processor in communication with at least one memory, the computer-implemented method comprising: 28. At least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with instructions stored thereon for electric vehicle charging management associated with electric vehicles and charging locations capable of charging the electric vehicles, wherein the instructions, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to: 21. A computer system for electric vehicle charging management associated with electric vehicles and charging locations capable of charging the electric vehicles, the computer system comprising: 13. A computer device for recharging electric vehicles, the computer device comprising: receiving a notification indicating that an electric vehicle has a low state of charge (SOC); receive a notification indicating that an electric vehicle has a low state of charge (SOC); at least one memory with instructions stored thereon; and one or more memories comprising instructions stored thereon; and receiving vehicle information regarding the electric vehicle, wherein the vehicle information comprises a location of the electric vehicle; receive vehicle information regarding the electric vehicle, wherein the vehicle information comprises a location of the electric vehicle; at least one processor in communication with the at least one memory, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to: one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories and configured to perform operations comprising: determining one or more potential charging locations based upon the location of the electric vehicle, wherein the one or more potential charging locations include homes; determine one or more potential charging locations based upon the location of the electric vehicle, wherein the one or more potential charging locations include homes; receive a notification indicating that an electric vehicle has a low state of charge (SOC); identifying a low SOC electric vehicle that has a state of charge (SOC) below a predetermined threshold; receiving charging location information regarding the one or more potential charging locations, wherein the charging location information comprises availability of the one or more potential charging locations and locations of the one or more potential charging locations, and wherein the availability of at least one potential charging location of the one or more potential charging locations indicates that a different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged at the at least one potential charging location; receive charging location information regarding the one or more potential charging locations, wherein the charging location information comprises availability of the one or more potential charging locations and locations of the one or more potential charging locations, and wherein the availability of at least one potential charging location of the one or more potential charging locations indicates that a different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged at the at least one potential charging location; receive vehicle information regarding the electric vehicle, wherein the vehicle information comprises a location of the electric vehicle; receiving first vehicle telematics data associated with the low SOC electric vehicle, wherein the first vehicle telematics data comprises acceleration data, braking data, cornering data, speed data, direction data, route data, and location data; generating a list of available charging locations for the electric vehicle, wherein the list includes a subset of the one or more potential charging locations and does not include the at least one potential charging location where the different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged; and generate a list of available charging locations for the electric vehicle, wherein the list includes a subset of the one or more potential charging locations and does not include the at least one potential charging location where the different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged; and determine one or more potential charging locations based upon the location of the electric vehicle, wherein the one or more potential charging locations include homes; determining a group of electric vehicles within a predetermined distance of the low SOC electric vehicle; receive charging location information regarding the one or more potential charging locations, wherein the charging location information comprises availability of the one or more potential charging locations and locations of the one or more potential charging locations, and wherein the availability of at least one potential charging location of the one or more potential charging locations indicates that a different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged at the at least one potential charging location; receiving second vehicle telematics data from the group of electric vehicles, wherein the second vehicle telematics data comprises a route being traveled, travel distance to destination information, remaining battery power information, and power available to transfer information; generate a list of available charging locations for the electric vehicle, wherein the list includes a subset of the one or more potential charging locations and does not include the at least one potential charging location where the different electric vehicle is waiting to be charged; and selecting an electric vehicle from the group of electric vehicles within the predetermined distance of the low SOC electric vehicle, wherein the selecting the electric vehicle from the group of electric vehicles comprises selecting the electric vehicle based at least in part upon the first vehicle telematics data and the second vehicle telematics data; and causing the list to be transmitted to the electric vehicle. cause the list to be transmitted to the electric vehicle. cause the list to be transmitted to the electric vehicle. scheduling a rendezvous point for the low SOC electric vehicle with the selected electric vehicle for recharging the low SOC electric vehicle, the selected electric vehicle having an available battery power bandwidth sufficient to satisfy traveling needs of both the low SOC electric vehicle and the selected electric vehicle. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIM ORTIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7114. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIM ORTIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683492
Dynamic Nonlinear Droop Control
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679245
SOC CONTROLLING METHOD FOR BATTERY FOR A MOBIILITY AND A MOBILITY APPARATUS IMPLEMENTING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676497
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND CONVERTERS FOR DISTRIBUTING POWER
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668148
ELECTRIC VEHICLE ENERGY STORAGE PRECONDITIONING FOR FAST CHARGING
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662002
AUXILIARY POWER UNIT (APU) FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES (EVS)
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month