Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/254,727

MODULAR CONVEYOR BELT WITH MOVEABLE HINGE ROD RETAINER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Priority
Nov 09, 2020 — provisional 63/111,302 +2 more
Examiner
SINGH, KAVEL
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Laitram LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1112 granted / 1328 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1366
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1328 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 2 states “rod posher”, should be “rod pusher”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the first hinge rod " in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the hinge rod pusher" in line 18. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,2, 8-11, 14, 17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ishikawa WO-2015025615-A1. Claim 1, Ishikawa teaches a conveyor belt module 12 Fig. 10 comprising: a body 13 extending in thickness from a top conveying surface 12 Fig. 10 to an opposite bottom surface Fig. 11, laterally from a first edge to a second edge and longitudinally from a first end to a second end Fig. 10, the body 13 including a first set of hinge elements 16a spaced apart along the first end and defining a first rod passageway Fig. 14, a second set of hinge elements 16b spaced along the second end and defining a second rod passageway 15b and a compartment at 20 in the body 13 intersecting the first rod passageway Fig. 14; and a hinge rod pusher 17 seated in the compartment at 20, wherein the hinge rod pusher 17 selectively pushes a hinge rod 32 out of the first rod passageway to allow removal of the hinge rod 32 Abstract. Claim 2, Ishikawa teaches the hinge rod pusher 17 pivots between a closed position containing the hinge rod 32 within the first rod passageway and an exposed position pushing the first hinge rod 32 out of the first rod passageway Figs. 10 and 14. Claim 8, Ishikawa teaches the first edge adjacent the hinge rod pusher 17 is solid to block the hinge rod 32 Fig. 14. Claim 9, Ishikawa teaches a latch 31 for latching the hinge rod pusher 17 in a selected position Fig. 10. Claim 10, Ishikawa teaches the compartment at 20 is adjacent and open to the first edge Fig. 14. Claims 11 and 19, Ishikawa teaches the hinge rod pusher 17 comprises a pivotable base Fig. 9 pivotally mounted in the compartment at 20, a flat outer wall of 17 that is flush with the first edge of 13 and a seat 20 for a head of the hinge rod 32 Fig. 14. Claim 14, Ishikawa teaches a rotatable rod occluder 23 adjacent to the first rod passageway of 13 for selectively blocking the rod passageway Fig. 3. Claim 17, Ishikawa teaches a method of removing a hinge rod 32 from a conveyor belt 11 comprising a series of hingedly connected conveyor belt modules 13, comprising the steps of: exposing an end of a hinge rod 32 connecting a first conveyor belt module 13 to a second conveyor belt module 13 by pushing the end out of a rod passageway using a rod pusher 17 seated in a compartment at 20 within the body 13 of the first conveyor belt module 13; and grasping and removing the hinge rod 32 from the conveyor belt 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 12-13, 15-16, and 20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEL SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2362. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached on (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEL SINGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 KS
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768272
CONTINUOUS ACTUATOR DRIVEN MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM FOR VERTICAL AND INCLINED SHAFTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759845
HANDRAIL FOR A PASSENGER TRANSPORT SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753025
Product Engagement Assembly, Related Systems And Methods
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12722901
CONVEYOR COMPONENT WITH FLEXIBLE HUB AND CONVEYOR ASSEMBLY
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723623
BEARING POSITIONING STRUCTURE WITHOUT RADIAL INTERFERENCE FIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month