Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Kavel Singh, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as SINGH, KAVEL

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3618 3651 3652 3671 3672

This examiner grants 84% of resolved cases

Analysis

SINGH, KAVEL works in Tech Center 3600 and Art Unit 3618. The profile records 1328 resolved cases, an 83.7% allowance rate, and a 14.0% interview lift. The allowance rate indicates a favorable recorded outcome pattern, while the interview figure suggests modest additional value from direct engagement. Applicants may place primary emphasis on clear written distinctions and focused amendments, using interviews to clarify issues that cannot be efficiently resolved on the papers.

The median time to allowance is 805 days. Krones AG, Ferag AG, and Canon Inc. are the listed leading companies. The leading firms are PAULEY ERICKSON & SWANSON, BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C., and CAESAR RIVISE, PC. The profile supports efficient prosecution with continued attention to claim scope and timing. Counsel should take advantage of the favorable allowance pattern without assuming that every matter will proceed identically, and should maintain a precise record of the technical distinctions supporting allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

83.7%
Allow Rate
+31.7% vs TC avg
1,366
Total Applications
+14.0%
Interview Lift
805
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 1328 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.9%
§101 Eligibility
39.2%
§102 Novelty
50.5%
§103 Obviousness
8.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19090183 MAGNETIC LEVITATION APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING MAGNETIC LEVITATION APPARATUS, MANUFACTURING SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ARTICLE Non-Final OA CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19102374 UNIT AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING ARTICLES Non-Final OA R.A JONES & CO.
19116459 Orientation Adjustment Apparatus Non-Final OA Daifuku Co., Ltd.
18617193 SYNCHRONIZING CONDITIONS FOR CONVEYOR BELT MONITORING Non-Final OA ContiTech Deutschland GmbH
19254727 MODULAR CONVEYOR BELT WITH MOVEABLE HINGE ROD RETAINER Non-Final OA Laitram, L.L.C.
18698984 CONVEYOR DEVICE, TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR CONVEYING WORKPIECES Final Rejection DÜRR SYSTEMS AG
19077942 RECEIVER DEVICE WITH INTERNAL DAMPING Final Rejection DYNAMIC AIR LTDA
19059710 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING MOTION PROFILE DATA FOR A TRANSPORT SYSTEM Final Rejection Schneider Electric Industries SAS
19073965 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING TRANSPORT UNITS OF AN OVERHEAD CONVEYOR SYSTEM Non-Final OA FERAG AG
18712321 DEVICE FOR MANAGING THE LOADING OF TRANSPORT UNITS OF A CONVEYOR SYSTEM Final Rejection FERAG AG

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Kavel Singh's allowance rate?

83.7% of resolved applications examined by Kavel Singh were allowed (1,328 resolved cases), compared with 61.7% across Art Unit 3618 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Kavel Singh?

This examiner's interview lift is +14.0 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Kavel Singh take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Kavel Singh took 805 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Kavel Singh work in?

Kavel Singh examines applications in Art Unit 3618 in Tech Center 3600 (Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month