Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/276,685

GEARED TURBOFAN WITH OVERSPEED PROTECTION

Non-Final OA §101§112§DP
Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Priority
Jun 16, 2017 — continuation of 10/612,555 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, ANDREW H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
RTX Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
674 granted / 897 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
923
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 897 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. “said fan rotor” (claim 1) lacks antecedent basis. Further in claim 1, “said propulsor drive shaft” is indefinite – it is unclear if it refers to the “propulsor turbine drive shaft” or a different one. In claim 2, “a propulsor drive shaft” is indefinite because it is unclear if it refers to the “propulsor turbine drive shaft” (claim 1), the “said propulsor drive shaft” (claim 1), or a different one. Claims 15-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. “said fan drive shaft” (claim 15) lacks antecedent basis. Claims 17, 21-23, 27-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. “said compressor section” lacks antecedent basis. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12385413. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Even though claims 1-3 recite a “propulsor” while claim 1 of 12385413 recites a “fan”, a propulsor in the context of a gas turbine engine is a fan. See for example US 2015/0239568 (para 3, 11). 12385413 claim 1 Claim 1-3 A gas turbine engine comprises: a fan drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a fan rotor, said fan rotor delivering air into a bypass duct as bypass air and into a compressor section as core flow; A gas turbine engine comprises: a propulsor drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a propulsor rotor, said fan rotor delivering air into a bypass duct as bypass air and into a compressor section as core flow; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a fan drive turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a propulsor turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said fan rotor in an outer direction of said second bearing, said catcher being fixed to static structure, said static structure being radially outward of said forward bearing, and said catcher including a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said fan drive shaft, and a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor in an outer direction of said second bearing, said catcher being fixed to static structure, said static structure being radially outward of said forward bearing, and said catcher including a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said propulsor drive shaft, said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, to resist said movement of said gear reduction, and said member being axially intermediate said forward bearing and said fan rotor; said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, to resist said movement of said gear reduction, and said member being axially intermediate said forward bearing and said propulsor rotor. said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction, said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a fan drive shaft to drive said fan rotor; wherein said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction, said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a propulsor drive shaft to drive said propulsor rotor. and said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said fan rotor. wherein said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said propulsor rotor. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-14 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent No. 12385413. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Even though the present claims recite a “propulsor” while claim 1 of 12385413 recites a “fan”, a propulsor in the context of a gas turbine engine is a fan. See for example US 2015/0239568 (para 3, 11). 12385413 claim 1 Claim 1-3, 9 A gas turbine engine comprises: a fan drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a fan rotor, said fan rotor delivering air into a bypass duct as bypass air and into a compressor section as core flow; A gas turbine engine comprises: a propulsor drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a propulsor rotor, said fan rotor delivering air into a bypass duct as bypass air and into a compressor section as core flow; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a fan drive turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a propulsor turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said fan rotor in an outer direction of said second bearing, said catcher being fixed to static structure, said static structure being radially outward of said forward bearing, and said catcher including a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said fan drive shaft, and a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor in an outer direction of said second bearing, said catcher being fixed to static structure, said static structure being radially outward of said forward bearing, and said catcher including a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said propulsor drive shaft, said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, to resist said movement of said gear reduction, and said member being axially intermediate said forward bearing and said fan rotor; said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, to resist said movement of said gear reduction, and said member being axially intermediate said forward bearing and said propulsor rotor. said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction, said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a fan drive shaft to drive said fan rotor; wherein said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction, said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a propulsor drive shaft to drive said propulsor rotor. and said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said fan rotor. wherein said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said propulsor rotor. 12385413 Claim 2 Claim 4, 10 wherein said catcher being between said gear reduction and said fan rotor. wherein said catcher being between said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor. 12385413 Claim 3 Claim 5 wherein said catcher is bolted to said static structure. wherein said catcher is bolted to said static structure. 12385413 Claim 4 Claim 6, 11 a bypass ratio is defined as a volume of air delivered into said bypass duct compared to a volume of air delivered into said compressor section, and said bypass ratio being greater than 6 and less than 25. wherein said propulsor rotor is a fan rotor and a bypass ratio is defined as a volume of air delivered into a bypass duct compared to a volume of air delivered into said compressor section, and said bypass ratio being greater than 6 and less than 25. 12385413 Claim 5 Claim 8, 13 wherein said bypass ratio being greater than 10. wherein said bypass ratio being greater than 10. 12385413 Claim 6 Claim 14 wherein said fan drive turbine having a pressure ratio greater than 5. wherein said propulsor drive turbine having a pressure ratio greater than 5. 12385413 Claim 7 Claim 7, 12 wherein said fan rotor having a plurality of fan blades, and a fan pressure ratio measured across the fan blades alone being less than 1.45. wherein said fan rotor having a plurality of fan blades, and a fan pressure ratio measured across the fan blades alone being less than 1.45. Claims 15-30 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 9-17 of U.S. Patent No. 12385413. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Even though the present claims recite a “propulsor” while claim 1 of 12385413 recites a “fan”, a propulsor in the context of a gas turbine engine is a fan. See for example US 2015/0239568 (para 3, 11). 12385413 claim 9-10 Claim 15-17 A gas turbine engine comprises: a fan drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a fan rotor, said fan rotor delivering air into a bypass duct as bypass air and into a compressor section as core flow; A gas turbine engine comprises:a propulsor drive turbine driving a gear reduction, said gear reduction, in turn, driving a propulsor rotor; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a forward bearing positioned between said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor and supporting said gear reduction, and a second bearing positioned aft of said gear reduction and supporting said gear reduction, and said second bearing being a thrust bearing; a fan drive turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a propulsor drive turbine drive shaft driving said gear reduction; a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said fan rotor in an outer direction in the event of a failure; said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction; a catcher provided to resist movement of said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor in an outer direction in the event of a failure;said gear reduction is an epicyclic gear reduction; said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a fan drive shaft to drive said fan rotor; said epicyclic gear reduction includes a sun gear driving intermediate gears, a static ring gear, and a carrier rotating when driven by said sun gear, said carrier being attached to a propulsor drive shaft to drive said propulsor rotor. said catcher includes a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said fan drive shaft, said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, said catcher to resist movement of said gear reduction; said catcher includes a member having a radially inner location positioned forwardly of a radially outwardly extending flange which rotates with said fan drive shaft, said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, said catcher to resist movement of said gear reduction; and wherein said catcher being between said gear reduction and said fan rotor and between said forward bearing and said fan rotor. wherein said catcher being between said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor and between said forward bearing and said propulsor rotor. wherein said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said fan rotor. said compressor section includes a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor and said low pressure compressor also being driven by said gear reduction to rotate with said propulsor rotor. 12385413 Claim 11 Claim 18 wherein said catcher is bolted to a static structure. wherein said catcher is bolted to a static structure. 12385413 Claim 12 Claim 20, 26 wherein said static structure supports said forward bearing. wherein said static structure supports said forward bearing. 12385413 Claim 13 Claim 19, 25 wherein said catcher is fixed to static structure. wherein said catcher is fixed to static structure. 12385413 Claim 14 Claim 21, 27 wherein a bypass ratio is defined as a volume of air delivered into said bypass duct compared to a volume of air delivered into said compressor section, and said bypass ratio being greater than 6 and less than 25. wherein said propulsor rotor is a fan rotor and a bypass ratio is defined as a volume of air delivered into a bypass duct compared to a volume of air delivered into said compressor section, and said bypass ratio being greater than 6 and less than 25. 12385413 Claim 15 Claim 22, 28 wherein said bypass ratio being greater than 10. wherein said bypass ratio being greater than 10. 12385413 Claim 16 Claim 24, 30 wherein said fan drive turbine having a pressure ratio greater than 5. wherein said propulsor drive turbine having a pressure ratio greater than 5. 12385413 Claim 17 Claim 23, 29 wherein said fan rotor having a plurality of fan blades, and a fan pressure ratio measured across the fan blades alone being less than 1.45. wherein said fan rotor having a plurality of fan blades, and a fan pressure ratio measured across the fan blades alone being less than 1.45. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-30 would be allowed if the double patenting rejections were overcome. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to teach, in combination with the other claim limitations, said catcher being contacted by said flange should said gear reduction move in a forward direction, said catcher to resist movement of said gear reduction; and said member being axially intermediate said forward bearing and said propulsor rotor or wherein said catcher being between said gear reduction and said propulsor rotor and between said forward bearing and said propulsor rotor. US 2017/0175753 teaches a propulsor/fan rotor, a gearbox, and a bearing between the gearbox and the propulsor rotor (Fig 5; bearing 34 or 32 between the gearbox 20 and the propulsor rotor 12) but fails to teach a catcher. US 2013/0186056 teaches a catcher positioned forward of a radially outwardly extending flange (Fig 1; catcher 21, flange 22), but fails to teach the catcher being between a gearbox and the propulsor rotor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5063. The examiner can normally be reached 8 am - 4 pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat (Pat) Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW H NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12721991
CASSETTE WITH FREE FLOW PREVENTION FOR INFUSION PUMP
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723759
COMBUSTOR FOR A GAS TURBINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12704260
SWIRLER WITH RECESSED FUEL FILMER AND AIR ASSIST FUEL NOZZLE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698742
HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12678571
A VEIN VISUALISATION AID DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.5%)
3y 5m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 897 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month