Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/288,840

CONFIGURED GRANTS FOR SIDELINK POSITIONING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Examiner
LAFONTANT, GARY
Art Unit
2646
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
4 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
332 granted / 458 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 458 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A) The amendment filed on 12/23/2025 has been acknowledged. Amendment Summary Claims 1 and 8-16 are amended. Claims 20 is canceled. Response to Arguments/Amendment Applicant has amended the independent claims 1, 8 and 17. The following OA examination reflect the new amended claims submitted herein. The arguments regarding previous claim submittal are moot since the amended claim has modified the scope of the previous claim. The amended claims are examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ben (US 2025/0184946 A1) Regarding Claim 1, 8, 17 Ben discloses an apparatus (Fig.1(104)) comprising: at least one processor (Fig.11(1106)); and at least one memory (Fig.11(1108)) storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor (Fig.11(1106)), cause the apparatus (Fig.1(104)) at least to: receive, from a resource scheduling entity (See [0007]; network node), at least one configured grant for sidelink transmission (See [0005]; [0007]; A network entity, such as a base station, generates the SL PRS configuration and signals the SL PRS configuration to the initiator UE including activation or deactivation of a CG resource for the SL PRS) among a plurality of user equipment (Fig1(104x)) via high-layer signaling (See [0007]; [0062-0066]; configuration is performed at higher signaling); and utilize at least one resource within the at least one configured grant for sidelink transmission (See Fig.14(1402)(1406); [0026-0027]; [0039-0040]; [0186]; [0188]; activate transmission of SL PRS by the apparatus in the semi-persistent manner; deactivate transmission of SL PRS by the apparatus in the semi-persistent manner) based on at least one indication received and originating from at least another user equipment (See [0039-0041]; The initiator UE 118 can transmit ( e.g., using a PC5 vehicle-to-everything (V2X) interface) the SL PRS configuration 116 to another UE 104 that is referred to as a responder UE; [0128-0129]; PC5 RRC signaling may be used by the initiator UE 104 to signal the periodic SL PRS configuration, activation, or deactivation to the responder UE 104), wherein the at least one indication indicates activating or deactivating the at least one resource (See [0039-0041]; [0122-0123]; resource is activate semi-persistent manner depending on transmission of another apparatus). Regarding Claim 2, 9, 18 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 1, 8, 17 and Ben further teaches wherein the at least one configured grant is configured for the plurality of user equipment in a sidelink positioning session (See [0005]; [0007]; [0026-0027]; grant is allocated to UE initiator and responder). Regarding Claim 3, 10 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 1, 9 and Ben further teaches wherein the at least one configured grant comprises at least one resource related to a plurality of orthogonal sidelink positioning reference signal sequences (See Table 5; [0058]; OFDM). Regarding Claim 4, 11 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 3, 10 and Ben further teaches wherein the plurality of orthogonal sidelink positioning reference signal sequences are orthogonal (See Table 5; [0058]; OFDM) in at least one of the following: time domain, frequency domain (See Table 5; [0058]; OFDM), or code domain. (The term “or’ translate into at least one limitation for complete examination) Regarding claim 5, 12 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 1, 8 and Ben further teaches wherein the at least one indication indicates an activation or a deactivation of the at least one resource for the plurality of user equipment in the sidelink positioning session (See Fig.14(1402)(1406); [0039-0040]; [0186]; [0188]; resource is activate semi-persistent manner depending on transmission of another apparatus) via low-layer signaling (See [0039-0042]; sidelink control information, medium access control (MAC) control element (CE), HARQ (e.g., SL HARQ) is used). Regarding Claim 6, 13 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 5, 12 and Ben further teaches wherein the low-layer signaling comprises sidelink control information (See [0042]; sidelink control information). Regarding claim 7, 14 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 1, 8 and Ben further teaches wherein the high-layer signaling comprises at least one of the following: radio resource control signaling (See [0039]; [0042]), medium access control element signaling (See [0042]), long-term evolution positioning protocol signaling (See [0050]; [0053]; [0145]) or sidelink positioning protocol signaling (See [0005]; [0026]; [0049]) Regarding Claim 15, 19 Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 8, 17 and Ben further teaches transmit, to the resource scheduling entity, a first list of the plurality of user equipment suitable for sidelink configured grant (See [0126-0127]; target of UEs that the base station or network entity needs to know there positions); and transmit to the resource scheduling entity a first trigger to request resource allocation for the plurality of user equipment (See [0127-0128]; Semistatic signaling, e.g., received from a base station 102, configures a PRS resource set to SL UEs when requested for positioning resources. There can be any number 'N' of PRS resources in each PRS resource set.) . Regarding Claim 16, Ben teaches all the features with respect to Claim 8 and Ben further teaches transmit, to the resource scheduling entity, the at least one indication indicating activation or deactivation of the at least one resource within the at least one configured grant for sidelink transmission (See [0005]; [0121]; [0148]; indicating successful activation and deactivation of resource to network node after Configuration Grant)). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY LAFONTANT whose telephone number is (571)272-3037. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM -5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Anderson can be reached at 571-272-7922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY LAFONTANT/Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 21, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 21, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604214
METHODS FOR GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION OF SYSTEM INFORMATION, SI, IN A MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK, MN, AND MNS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598581
METHOD FOR SENDING PAGING CAUSE AND METHOD FOR ACQUIRING PAGING CAUSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587833
METHODS AND DEVICE FOR CONFIGURING A UWB SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581431
PHR REPORTING METHOD, PHR RECEIVING METHOD, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557127
METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR ALLOCATING ROUTING RESOURCES OF WIFI6 ROUTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+1.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 458 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month